What's new

5,000-year Harappan stepwell found in Kutch, bigger than Mohenjo Daro's

They didn't move to other part they moved to Ganges valley as land was more fertile there.
So mate, as per you, they vacate the whole area?
That's not the fact, the truth is that this civilization migrated from all direction (from west, east, north and south) but they did not went to Ganges valley. The Indus Valley civilization was mainly composed of areas which is now Pakistan and the Indus Valley civilization was dependent on the Indus River which flows across Pakistan.
 
.
So mate, as per you, they vacate the whole area?
That's not the fact, the truth is that this civilization migrated from all direction (from west, east, north and south) but they did not went to Ganges valley. The Indus Valley civilization was mainly composed of areas which is now Pakistan and the Indus Valley civilization was dependent on the Indus River which flows across Pakistan.

there was only one place to move that was East.
 
.
there was only one place to move that was East.
Why? Was there any dragon in the western parts scaring those people or they went to watch foot ball World Cup which was going on in eastern part. Lol
Mate! They did not migrated that far, the Indus Valley civilization was solely based on Indus River. And why would they migrate in other strange lands searching for water and fertile land when they have fertile land of their own and massive river flowing in their back yard.
 
.
So mate, as per you, they vacate the whole area?
That's not the fact, the truth is that this civilization migrated from all direction (from west, east, north and south) but they did not went to Ganges valley. The Indus Valley civilization was mainly composed of areas which is now Pakistan and the Indus Valley civilization was dependent on the Indus River which flows across Pakistan.
3e4e32f66dc316062ec26f457a036368.png


a27f824e9ae634f558b9c38fdf265052.png


0212ae9e09032c056890454162af801d.png
 
. .
Oh common dude. Both Indians and Pakistanis are the descendants of the same people. IVC is a common heritage for both. The only problem is that Islamic Republic of Pakistan hasn't got anything to with it. You cannot claim exclusivity in its ownership just because you happen to live there. Pakistani's have as much right to call IVC theirs as Indians (contrary to my previous posts, coz after all.
c030bbd4bd28793278501cd344d72d07.jpg
 
.
Already done and I don't need your help in this regard.

My Point is clear

*Pakistanis(Majority though not all)=IVC
*India(More than 95%)=Ganges and the rest of Indian Civilizations

NOTE:Indus valley civilization is also referred to as "Ancient Pakistani Civlization" by modern source's
Use common sense,as the name is derived from Indus

Indus=Indus River=93% river course in Pakistan=Indus valley civilization=Pakistan

A civilization is defined by its culture, values and practices, IVC was an idol worshipping pagan civilization, now who has inherited that culture, India or Pakistan?

And isn't it somewhat blasphemous for you guys to associate yourselves with an idol worshipping pagan civilization? :)
 
.
You do understand that Indus Valley sites are scattered and extend from Balochistan to Haryana right? And during those thousands of years, there have been migrations?

The funny thing is that the Boloch people themselves are clear migrants from North west Iran.(Sistan) . They can't even place themselves in Pakistan till the 11th & 12th centuries. I'm sure however that won't stop some intrepid people from claiming that inheritance too.

I wonder, why they couldn't make the same type of planned cities in the Ganges plain. Would have solved majority of todays Swacch Bharat mission.:whistle:

Why do you think they didn't? The only difference is that area was continuously inhabited with layers upon layers added to it. Harappan sites are merely those examples that have been frozen in time because of abandonment .
 
.
.
All Pakistanis may be originated from IVC but all Indians are not originated from IVC. Just because they migrated to few parts of india doesn't means that you guys are originated from IVC. The IVC was created in land which is now Pakistan and flourished here and even their descendants are spread all across Pakistan which you can't see in india.

You can see descendants of IVC in Pakistan??? how? who?
 
.
A civilization is defined by its culture, values and practices, IVC was an idol worshipping pagan civilization, now who has inherited that culture, India or Pakistan?

And isn't it somewhat blasphemous for you guys to associate yourselves with an idol worshipping pagan civilization? :)

Lol,trying hard to claim our history?Abhey apni ki history hi nahin hai tum logo ki?

No sorry,you cannot become indigenous to the civilization by merely having practices similar to them otherwise whole of the muslim world will claim to own the ancient arab civilizations.

I repeat it again,Stick to ganges civilization and don't interefere into our history otherwise the response will be devastating
 
.
Lol,trying hard to claim our history?Abhey apni ki history hi nahin hai tum logo ki?

No sorry,you cannot become indigenous to the civilization by merely having practices similar to them otherwise whole of the muslim world will claim to own the ancient arab civilizations.

I repeat it again,Stick to ganges civilization and don't interefere into our history otherwise the response will be devastating

:lol: It's like the ticket collector thinking that he is the cultural inheritor to all that is there in the museum.
 
.
A civilization is defined by its culture, values and practices, IVC was an idol worshipping pagan civilization, now who has inherited that culture, India or Pakistan?

And isn't it somewhat blasphemous for you guys to associate yourselves with an idol worshipping pagan civilization? :)

Yes they were idol worshipping people but then later on they were converted to islam. And let me remind you friend we are not talking about religion over here, we are talking about the civilization. You can't simply claim IVC to be indian just because they were idol worshippers. In this way we can also claim that the people in Iraq and Pakistan have same ancestors simply because they follow same religion.
 
.
India dunya ka wahid mulk hay jiski history uskay dushman mulk se start hoti hai.

India once again dunya ka wo wahid mulk hai jiska naam uskay dushman mulk ka darya (indus) parr rakha gya hay.

India should be happy otherwise we hold the patent to drag india into UN over using a Name of Pakistani origin as India for there country.

Its time to change your name to Bharat varsha or Bharatdesh or even Bharatistan.we won't mind.

NOTE:Even hindu is based off our Sindhi/Sindhu.

ye kaise history hay tum logo ki
 
.
Lol,trying hard to claim our history?Abhey apni ki history hi nahin hai tum logo ki?

No sorry,you cannot become indigenous to the civilization by merely having practices similar to them otherwise whole of the muslim world will claim to own the ancient arab civilizations.

I repeat it again,Stick to ganges civilization and don't interefere into our history otherwise the response will be devastating
A threat? really?
BTW history cannot be owned by one group. It is almost impossible to track back the real ancestry of a person back to 5000 years. But claiming that the site found in Kutch is not a part of IVC is clearly ridiculous to say the least.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom