What's new

40 jihad brides sentenced to death in Iraq

unfortunately sunni's have no leadership, no accountability, no system, no governance........this is the real issue.

P.S. This is not good for Iran btw......as these losers on Zionist life support are all surrounding Iran in failed states prone to manipulation by outside powers. It's a sad fact of life.

Imagine being so dumb you leave the stableness of your home country to a so called holy land that was established by terrorism from a group even Al Qaeda thought was too extreme.

Now you end up as a loser on death row that followed the beliefs of a bunch of losers while your only sympathy will be gained from other losers.

lol losers
:lol:
 
.
unfortunately sunni's have no leadership, no accountability, no system, no governance........this is the real issue.

P.S. This is not good for Iran btw......as these losers on Zionist life support are all surrounding Iran in failed states prone to manipulation by outside powers. It's a sad fact of life.

Iran is the Sunni leader
 
. . .
life in imprisonment is better but still u dont know who is who
they knew what they were doing joining terrorist
 
.
ISIS should be made an example for anyone who have smallest sympathy for this cult. Total Eradication nothing less.
The Children should be taken to rehab centers to reintegrate them into to society while adults should be executed by due court process.
either male or female.
 
.
I don't like having these discussions too but people get too carried away and distant from God, making them adopt unjust positions and force themselves to stray away from the path. Sometimes you have to correct people, whom should be looking after themselves in that regard.

I know you for a long time, in June 2014 you were one of the most proponent IS supporters here on the forum whilst they took Mosul. You'd do the same thing again if they were to rise in power today.

The religious talk does not interest me neither does it matter, Islamic scholars are not really scholars there's nothing scientific about them.
 
.
How do you know ideology is correct and original one? So far you people only follow your kings and queens. Doesn't you? You can call them anything you like but in the end they are just kings amassing great wealth and have nothing to do with islam.

What? Nation states have governments, people live under their governments. So do you Iranian, Iraqi's, Syrians and Lebanese. What do you see that is different? Doesn't change that Sunni Islam is the orthodox and original Islam, and Shia and others are sects that deviated that falsified beliefs that never existed among Muslims for political purposes.

This have been seen since the death of holy prophet. People following kings and queens and princes and calling them pious islamic following. The proof of this can be seen clearly today as you people follow sheikhs of arab peninsula and call them "guardian of holy sites" on the same time knowing fully well how are they.

No, Sunni Muslims followed the four rightly guided Caliph's, that you consider 'Kings' just because one of them fought a war with the historical Persians.

So please, refrain. There is no I mean NONE sunni majority country which can declare itself truly islamic. The condition of you people from morocco to indonesia can be seen clearly as day.

Lol, you really can't read or you are intentionally putting words in my mouth which is common approach people like you have. You can't just be honest and straightforward regarding what I said. Which is the ideology is the pure one and it always exists. If you implement Sharia fully, not every country does so and that's up to the country. Until there is another Caliphate, which already has been determined that there will not be another legtimate one until the minor signs all come to an end and it will be formed right before major signs.

Next thing, we shia only follow Allah, Prophet and Household of Prophet. It is YOU who are deviated.

You don't follow Allah or the Prophet, you do shirk against Allah and everyone knows this. You make up teachings that never existed and there are no sources for except fabricated sources. Muslims follow the Prophet, there is no such thing as following the 'household' of the Prophet. That's a way for Shia to deviate and separate themselves from other Muslims for political purposes. Those related to the Prophet were all Arab(whom you hate) and Sunni Muslims, they did not believe anything modern Shia believe.

I know you for a long time,

I know you too.

in June 2014 you were one of the most proponent IS supporters here on the forum whilst they took Mosul. You'd do the same thing again if they were to rise in power today.

No I wasn't, you're more than welcome to try pulling up such previous posts. When that happened the Sunni's in Mosul and the army were blamed by many Shia members and Iranians. Me, like others, questioned the Iraqi's governments policies towards Sunni's at the time under Maliki. Which every news agency was covering, and even the President of the US at the time, Obama, demanded steps be taken by Maliki before committing with military options. And indeed Maliki decided to step down and measures were taken. Afterwards many of us on this forum were satisfied with the government. Which only you and other Iranian Shia fanatics consider as supporting ISIS.

They were actually more powerful after that period and I was well known to be against them. So spare me your nonsense, I already told you in the past if I genuinely believed they were rightly guided people I would support them. But they are not rightly guided as their actions on purported beliefs suggest.

The religious talk does not interest me neither does it matter, Islamic scholars are not really scholars there's nothing scientific about them.

I'm not a scholar and did not bring up scholars, but if it bothers you, you can ignore my posts.
 
.
You sure talk a lot for a refugee!

What? Nation states have governments, people live under their governments. So do you Iranian, Iraqi's, Syrians and Lebanese. What do you see that is different? Doesn't change that Sunni Islam is the orthodox and original Islam, and Shia and others are sects that deviated that falsified beliefs that never existed among Muslims for political purposes.



No, Sunni Muslims followed the four rightly guided Caliph's, that you consider 'Kings' just because one of them fought a war with the historical Persians.



Lol, you really can't read or you are intentionally putting words in my mouth which is common approach people like you have. You can't just be honest and straightforward regarding what I said. Which is the ideology is the pure one and it always exists. If you implement Sharia fully, not every country does so and that's up to the country. Until there is another Caliphate, which already has been determined that there will not be another legtimate one until the minor signs all come to an end and it will be formed right before major signs.



You don't follow Allah or the Prophet, you do shirk against Allah and everyone knows this. You make up teachings that never existed and there are no sources for except fabricated sources. Muslims follow the Prophet, there is no such thing as following the 'household' of the Prophet. That's a way for Shia to deviate and separate themselves from other Muslims for political purposes. Those related to the Prophet were all Arab(whom you hate) and Sunni Muslims, they did not believe anything modern Shia believe.



I know you too.



No I wasn't, you're more than welcome to try pulling up such previous posts. When that happened the Sunni's in Mosul and the army were blamed by many Shia members and Iranians. Me, like others, questioned the Iraqi's governments policies towards Sunni's at the time under Maliki. Which every news agency was covering, and even the President of the US at the time, Obama, demanded steps be taken by Maliki before committing with military options. And indeed Maliki decided to step down and measures were taken. Afterwards many of us on this forum were satisfied with the government. Which only you and other Iranian Shia fanatics consider as supporting ISIS.

They were actually more powerful after that period and I was well known to be against them. So spare me your nonsense, I already told you in the past if I genuinely believed they were rightly guided people I would support them. But they are not rightly guided as their actions on purported beliefs suggest.



I'm not a scholar and did not bring up scholars, but if it bothers you, you can ignore my posts.
 
Last edited:
.
What? Nation states have governments, people live under their governments. So do you Iranian, Iraqi's, Syrians and Lebanese. What do you see that is different? Doesn't change that Sunni Islam is the orthodox and original Islam, and Shia and others are sects that deviated that falsified beliefs that never existed among Muslims for political purposes.



No, Sunni Muslims followed the four rightly guided Caliph's, that you consider 'Kings' just because one of them fought a war with the historical Persians.



Lol, you really can't read or you are intentionally putting words in my mouth which is common approach people like you have. You can't just be honest and straightforward regarding what I said. Which is the ideology is the pure one and it always exists. If you implement Sharia fully, not every country does so and that's up to the country. Until there is another Caliphate, which already has been determined that there will not be another legtimate one until the minor signs all come to an end and it will be formed right before major signs.



You don't follow Allah or the Prophet, you do shirk against Allah and everyone knows this. You make up teachings that never existed and there are no sources for except fabricated sources. Muslims follow the Prophet, there is no such thing as following the 'household' of the Prophet. That's a way for Shia to deviate and separate themselves from other Muslims for political purposes. Those related to the Prophet were all Arab(whom you hate) and Sunni Muslims, they did not believe anything modern Shia believe.



I know you too.



No I wasn't, you're more than welcome to try pulling up such previous posts. When that happened the Sunni's in Mosul and the army were blamed by many Shia members and Iranians. Me, like others, questioned the Iraqi's governments policies towards Sunni's at the time under Maliki. Which every news agency was covering, and even the President of the US at the time, Obama, demanded steps be taken by Maliki before committing with military options. And indeed Maliki decided to step down and measures were taken. Afterwards many of us on this forum were satisfied with the government. Which only you and other Iranian Shia fanatics consider as supporting ISIS.

They were actually more powerful after that period and I was well known to be against them. So spare me your nonsense, I already told you in the past if I genuinely believed they were rightly guided people I would support them. But they are not rightly guided as their actions on purported beliefs suggest.



I'm not a scholar and did not bring up scholars, but if it bothers you, you can ignore my posts.
All I heard is we are pure and original and you are bad and assuming loads of things about shia. Problem is you got nothing, you say implement 'sharia' fully but there is no sunni state which is ready to implement it.

- No I dont consider him king because he fought war with persia. I consider him king or 'caliph' because he was. Just like long line of caliph after him forming Ummyad dynasty. There amass great wealth and you people continue to call them caliph.

- 'you do shirk against Allah and everyone knows this' - Allah is One and there is no equal to him. There I said it, so who is this "everyone" who say shia do shirk. Shirk is you what. Bowing down to saudi Kings! like you people do. "everyone" knows that.
 
.
Problem is you got nothing, you say implement 'sharia' fully but there is no sunni state which is ready to implement it.

You make no sense at all, you are the one who brought up Sharia in first place by suggesting Arab countries aren't ruled by Islam. I assumed you were referring to the implementation of Shariah, if not go ahead and enlighten us.

- No I dont consider him king because he fought war with persia. I consider him king or 'caliph' because he was. Just like long line of caliph after him forming Ummyad dynasty. There amass great wealth and you people continue to call them caliph.

Umar Ibn Khattab(RA) is considered one of rightly guided Caliph's for us, what did you think he is a Prophet? He led the Rashidun Caliphate and not the Umayyad dynasty. Sunni Muslims consider the first four rightly guided Caliph's, or Khulafah Al Rashideen. As for the rest of those Caliphs in both Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties, they are historically considered Caliph's, whether one believes they are rightly guided or not. One example is Umar bin Abdul Aziz who is considered a good Caliph by Sunni Muslims. We don't consider every leader in either dynasty to be good. By the way Abbasids is a Sunni dynasty as well and did not share beliefs of Shia even though Shia did assist Ali(RA).

- 'you do shirk against Allah and everyone knows this' - Allah is One and there is no equal to him. There I said it, so who is this "everyone" who say shia do shirk. Shirk is you what. Bowing down to saudi Kings! like you people do. "everyone" knows that.

Some Shia have beliefs that amount to Shirk some don't , that you know of. As for Saudi kings, I'm not sure what brought that up? I 'bow down to Saudi Kings', what does that mean, man? Do you even realize what you're saying? Why do you dislike Saudi people and culture so much? Clearly your grievances against them go well beyond dislike of leadership....
 
.
All I heard is we are pure and original and you are bad and assuming loads of things about shia. Problem is you got nothing, you say implement 'sharia' fully but there is no sunni state which is ready to implement it.

- No I dont consider him king because he fought war with persia. I consider him king or 'caliph' because he was. Just like long line of caliph after him forming Ummyad dynasty. There amass great wealth and you people continue to call them caliph.

- 'you do shirk against Allah and everyone knows this' - Allah is One and there is no equal to him. There I said it, so who is this "everyone" who say shia do shirk. Shirk is you what. Bowing down to saudi Kings! like you people do. "everyone" knows that.

Which country are you from?
 
. . .
You make no sense at all, you are the one who brought up Sharia in first place by suggesting Arab countries aren't ruled by Islam. I assumed you were referring to the implementation of Shariah, if not go ahead and enlighten us.



Umar Ibn Khattab(RA) is considered one of rightly guided Caliph's for us, what did you think he is a Prophet? He led the Rashidun Caliphate and not the Umayyad dynasty. Sunni Muslims consider the first four rightly guided Caliph's, or Khulafah Al Rashideen. As for the rest of those Caliphs in both Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties, they are historically considered Caliph's, whether one believes they are rightly guided or not. One example is Umar bin Abdul Aziz who is considered a good Caliph by Sunni Muslims. We don't consider every leader in either dynasty to be good. By the way Abbasids is a Sunni dynasty as well and did not share beliefs of Shia even though Shia did assist Ali(RA).



Some Shia have beliefs that amount to Shirk some don't , that you know of. As for Saudi kings, I'm not sure what brought that up? I 'bow down to Saudi Kings', what does that mean, man? Do you even realize what you're saying? Why do you dislike Saudi people and culture so much? Clearly your grievances against them go well beyond dislike of leadership....

I am not referring to just sharia. I am referring to over all state of sunni islam. The things left within you is "corruption, money, power and bigotry". Once you implement sharia you become ISIS or you go moderate you become dubai. If you want to throw garbage at other sects learn to change yourself. If you want me to convert to Sunni then you must show how islamic sunni community is.

So far, You people are a cheat in my view nothing else.

Still defending your caliphs. Should I post here with pictures how your caliphs lived by or should I show you the artifacts made of gold and filth found containing in there houses . Tell me one thing is al saud family "guardians to holy sites"?

So its about about culture now. isn't it. Since its saudi culture to bow to kings. It doesnt come as shirk?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom