What's new

4 Chinese nationals arrested in Arunachal.

If China disputes that Arunachal is not a part of India, & India says Arunachal is an integral part of it; it means Arunachal Pradesh is "disputed" territory. It's pretty much common sense.

if tomorrow india says sindh belongs to india and pakistan says it belongs to pakistan so then sindh becomes disputed terrority..do you agree?
 
if tomorrow india says sindh belongs to india and pakistan says it belongs to pakistan so then sindh becomes disputed terrority..do you agree?

Sindh was accepted as a part of Pakistan, & the border of Sindh-Punjab, Pakistan & Gujarat/Rajasthan-Punjab, India was accepted by both countries in 1947. It was recognized by both the countries as the international border. But that is not the case with Kashmir as you know, or Arunachal for that matter.
 
Sindh was accepted as a part of Pakistan, & the border of Sindh-Punjab, Pakistan & Gujarat/Rajasthan-Punjab, India was accepted by both countries in 1947. It was recognized by both the countries as the international border. But that is not the case with Kashmir as you know, or Arunachal for that matter.

Then Gilgit Balchistan and Pakistan Occupied kashmir (You call Azad Kashmir) are disputed and belongs to India.

Same like Aksai Chin and North Kashmir area which was ceded to China from Pakistan are disputed and belongs to India.

We have claim on above mentioned since decades and it will be like this only in future too. Let see who gets what.... :cheers:
 
Sindh was accepted as a part of Pakistan, & the border of Sindh-Punjab, Pakistan & Gujarat/Rajasthan-Punjab, India was accepted by both countries in 1947. It was recognized by both the countries as the international border. But that is not the case with Kashmir as you know, or Arunachal for that matter.

so you mean if any chineese enter arunachal pradesh,india should not arrest him?
if you say yes then same applies to pakistan occupied kashmir and tibet...

btw wat will chineese do if a indian enters tibet without proper documents? Will they not arrest....? If they arrest then same applies here too

and well done to that police officer for catching chineese spies
get them to court if they are proved to be spies put them to jail as per ipc
 
Then Gilgit Balchistan and Pakistan Occupied kashmir (You call Azad Kashmir) are disputed and belongs to India.

Same like Aksai Chin and North Kashmir area which was ceded to China from Pakistan are disputed and belongs to India.

We have claim on above mentioned since decades and it will be like this only in future too. Let see who gets what.... :cheers:

This thread isn't about Kashmir, it's about Arunachal.
 
so you mean if any chineese enter arunachal pradesh,india should not arrest him?
if you say yes then same applies to pakistan occupied kashmir and tibet...

btw wat will chineese do if a indian enters tibet without proper documents? Will they not arrest....? If they arrest then same applies here too

and well done to that police officer for catching chineese spies
get them to court if they are proved to be spies put them to jail as per ipc

Tibet is not disputed territory, it is a part of China. India does not claim Tibet to be part of India. South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh is disputed territory, because India claims Arunachal Pradesh to be part of India, & China says South Tibet is part of China.
 
Tibet is not disputed territory, it is a part of China. India does not claim Tibet to be part of India. South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh is disputed territory, because India claims Arunachal Pradesh to be part of India, & China says South Tibet is part of China.

That's right buddy. :tup:
 
This thread isn't about Kashmir, it's about Arunachal.

Exactly, I agree on that.

We have Claim on Aksai Chin and Kashmir part which was ceded to China from Pakistan.........and China Claims AP from India.

These two are just bargaining point for both the countries. China is claiming because India has claim. Nothing is going to change even in next 50 Years but yes both India and China will be 2 Largest economy beside U.S.A. in world and will make or break the world market after few decades. That is sure. :toast_sign:
 
It's funny that the separatist the Dalai Lama gets shelter & refuge in India. The Dalai Lamas are Chinese citizens, & India has the responsibility to send them back to China if it asks them to.

Three corrections:

1) Firstly he is "His Holiness" the Dalai Lama.
2) He is a valued guest of the Govt of India and more importantly of the Indian people.
3)Thirdly Tibetans consider themselves Tibetans not Chinese.
 
No.

Its part of the Sovereign territory of India or in other words it (Mac-mahon LIne) is as disputed as the Durand Line.

Despite the little regard Afghanistan has for the Durand Line, Afghanistan has never claimed that parts of the KPK or FATA are Afghan territory. The Durand Line has been accepted by both countries, even though Afghans have a dislike for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom