danger007
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 10,007
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
the truth is if i say otherwise i wud be branded as a sickular/congressi/etc etc.
going with the flow is in fashion nowadays.
when the ques for cash is being compared with ques for JIO sim, its all over folks.
yes. u are absolutely true.
our opposition is more good at buying media houses while not a single media house is working for NDA.
i agree its all one sided.
It is more political than the corruption. If 1000 note is called big note, then what is 2000 note?
1. I would support this move if only if pumping 100 bills a week before note ban. Thus by circulation and availability of cash to public.
2. he first banned then day after started exchanging new bills. And moreover 500 not even reached to states like AP. How can a poor person run his house needs with 2000bill. When there is no one offering change purchasing products.
3. He is not targeting monster fish but just smaller ones those who store in liquid cash may face prob. but not the one with gold, properties and $$$.
I agree with you. If we see long term benefits like you mentioned like reductions in housing loan rates and others then this would be great. These are the tangible benefits I am talking about. If none of this helps in tangible ways then people will rightfully ask, for what were we made to go through all this trouble ? Please remember this wont hurt the big sharks anyway which have parked their money abroad, they will get only the small fry with this move.It would still be great if leads to some benefits like the reduction in housing loans or other ways.
If the loans rates reduce that would benefit employers but not the labour.. we are talking about big note causing corruption and what is the 2000 note then.