3 terrorist attacks in South Waziristan attack

[Moon]

Who said it's ineffective ?

That's what I deduced from your comment

 

[Dalit]

Question, hope I don’t get bashed for it.
is the TTP affiliated to the Afghan Taliban? And if Talban takes over Afghanistan, will it have consequences for the TTP?

The TTP has no affiliation with the Taliban as we know them. TTP are disgruntled militants that were fighting against the Pakistani state and had to flee and regroup in Afghanistan. The Taliban doesn't recognize nor support the TTP. The Afghans and Indians will try to tell you a different story.

 

[Moon]

The TTP has no affiliation with the Taliban as we know them

You need to catch up on Gul Bahadur group then.
They're protecting IEA's flank in Khost.

 

[RealNapster]

That's what I deduced from your comment

Than you should work on your comprehension abilities.

 

[Dalit]

We have lost four to five soldiers in last 48 hours. This is getting seriously bad. General Bajwa should resign.

Bajwa and the pacifists among us are waiting for US/NATO end date. Not a terrible policy in my opinion, but as India and the Afghan regime get more desperate we will see more attacks. Are we willing to sacrifice until the Taliban make full inroads?

You need to catch up on Gul Bahadur group then.
They're protecting IEA's flank in Khost.

Just another shady group that has been fighting against the Pak army. Nothing to do with proper Taliban in Afghanistan. They are called Gul Bahadur group for a reason and not the Taliban. This Hafiz Gul Bahadur murtad used to be a Shura Mujahideen in North Waziristan LOL

 

[Moon]

Than you should work on your comprehension abilities.

Educate me on your "out of the box" surveillance. I'm curious.

Just another shady group that has been fighting against the Pak army. Nothing to do with proper Taliban in Afghanistan

GB is involved in carrying out attacks on both side of the border.
IEA played a big part in reuniting them.

 

[Dalit]

Educate me on your "out of the box" surveillance. I'm curious.

GB is involved in carrying out attacks on both side of the border.
IEA played a big part in protecting them.

True. However, he has no affiliations with the Afghan Taliban. This murtad is on a lone crusade against the Pakistani state and specifically the Pak army.

 

[RealNapster]

Educate me on your "out of the box" surveillance. I'm curious.

My post ended with a suggestion. It didn't continued post that listing solutions. Problem solutions include many phases the first being accepting there is a problem. You have a working brain mashallah, work on the second one if you agree with the first stage. If you don't agree than let it be.

 

[Moon]

True. However, he has no affiliations with the Afghan Taliban.

They're literally fighting KPF for IEA. How is that no affiliation?

 

[Tornado23]

As per the reports these are small scale attacks against the army. These are purely to demoralise us. I'm guessing they are running out of resources and manpower it conduct such large attacks like they used to. Now it's only 1 shaheed and they leave.

@PanzerKiel is hunting season on?

 

[Moon]

As per the reports these are small scale attacks against the army. These are purely to demoralise us. I'm guessing they are running out of resources and manpower it conduct such large attacks like they used to. Now it's only 1 shaheed and they leave.

@PanzerKiel is hunting season on?

Before we go hunting, we need to have the capability to trace every single terrorist attack.
We know they're only hitting security personnel, so why don't we monitor our check posts and routes our vehicles and convoys take?
TTP is literally presenting itself to be hit, they're coming to us, rather than making us look for them.
Wide area surveillance is the name of the game.

 

[Moon]

My post ended with a suggestion. It didn't continued post that listing solutions. Problem solutions include many phases the first being accepting there is a problem. You have a working brain mashallah, work on the second one if you agree with the first stage. If you don't agree than let it be.

I agree with that we need to ramp up our surveillance capabilities. I thought you wanted to add something to the conversation.

 

[Tornado23]

Before we go hunting, we need to have the capability to trace every single terrorist attack.
We know they're only hitting security personnel, so why don't we monitor our check posts and routes our vehicles and convoys take?
TTP is literally presenting itself to be hit, they're coming to us, rather than making us look for them.
Wide area surveillance is the name of the game.

I would like to see UCAV support for our army on the borders when there is a terror attack. But the thing is, it's better the hunt the terrorists down in their safe haven and neutralise them and their bases there rather than in pakistan. It will have a massive psychological effect on them. Constant ssg raids on their safe havens in Afghanistan will demoralise them. We may even see more surrenders from them.


But I have no idea whats happening though. Top leadership is being quite on this. This could mean 2 things. Ssg is already hunting. Or... Army is getting ready to go hunting once the nato withdrawal date has passed. That being 9/11 right?

 

[Dalit]

Papa Bajwa is sleepin!!!!

I will hold Bajwa responsible after US/NATO withdrawal on September 11th. US/NATO has always been the excuse.

 

[Goritoes]

Poor soldiers being used as canon fodder while Generals enjoy their lives.