GORKHALI
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2010
- Messages
- 3,689
- Reaction score
- -9
So True... china its atleast 10 years ahead of russians in stealth tech...
can you name the person who piloted the chinese J 20 for 1st time ??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So True... china its atleast 10 years ahead of russians in stealth tech...
can any one please explain to me that how T-50 is not a true 5th gen fighter and how are the chinese are 10 years ahead of russians.
Russians have decade of experience in aircraft design and manufacture.In fact they were the only one seriously threatening the American's for a long time.
Dude just look at the J-20, the F-22 the F35 they all look alike, the T-50 looks like a 4th gen fighter....all I have to say is, if it looks and quacks like a duck..then it must be a duck(4th gen)
Dude just look at the J-20, the F-22 the F35 they all look alike, the T-50 looks like a 4th gen fighter....all I have to say is, if it looks and quacks like a duck..then it must be a duck(4th gen)
the T-50 does not LOOK stealthy at all, but you are blinded by the same guys you pay to make them?...yeah sure the T-50 is stealthy...Oh.. So its the looks that determines what generation it is..
Wonderful.. I didnt knew that. Thanks for the info.
the T-50 does not LOOK stealthy at all, but you are blinded by the same guys you pay to make them?...yeah sure the T-50 is stealthy...
there is a reason the J-20 looks stealthy...Because it is...
I swear to god...Explain look stealthy..
Dude just look at the J-20, the F-22 the F35 they all look alike, the T-50 looks like a 4th gen fighter....all I have to say is, if it looks and quacks like a duck..then it must be a duck(4th gen)
Imma hafta wait for my boy Gambit to put you on your place troll...- the only 5th gen fighter with up to 5 (maybe even 6) AESA radars
- the only 5th gen fighter, that will have a dedicated IRST (F35 has a targeting pod with A2A modes)
- the only 5th gen fighter with movable LERX
- highest SC speed
- biggest internal weapon bay with up to 10 AAMs
- the rumored radar blocker is a completely new technology as well and would make serpentine ducts pointless
Imma hafta wait for my boy Gambit to put you on your place troll...
New Recruit
http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-...ototype-maiden-flight-pics-8.html#post1537568
Check the lower pic (post 110) in regard of "look" and you will see that T50 has just the same stealth shapings of the airframe, canopy, air intakes, or tail fins like any other 5th gen fighter as well.
The funny thing imo is, that so many people hype the J20 now, although so less is known about it and it's capabilities and although Pak Fa instead even at this stage of the development sets new benchmarks of capabilities!
- the only 5th gen fighter with up to 5 (maybe even 6) AESA radars
- the only 5th gen fighter, that will have a dedicated IRST (F35 has a targeting pod with A2A modes)
- the only 5th gen fighter with movable LERX
- highest SC speed
- biggest internal weapon bay with up to 10 AAMs
- the rumored radar blocker is a completely new technology as well and would make serpentine ducts pointless
How many of these things will J20 have, or what completely new feature will it offer, that no other fighter has?
Don't even start to guess, because you simply don't know it!
J20 is a good step forward for China, but so far it is not clear how far the development really is and how capable the fighter really will be.
T50 is under development as well, but the things that we already know, are more than impressive and obviously puts in a league with US stealth fighters. Performancewise it seems to be even better then them and that with the interim engine only, now consider how good it will be with the final engine, TVC and all stealth features integrated.
And also J-20 has forward canards!! Now what 5th generation plane has forwards canards? For this localoca guy Forward canards means larger RCS so J-20's stealth-like capabilties are debatable if not questionable.