What's new

2014 is not 1962 - Indian Much Better Prepared for Chinese Challenge

Well,in almost all the places except the AksaiChin region.But that region was never physically occupied by independent India and had already fallen into de facto Chinese control much earlier from the time the hostilities began.............most likely in the year 1959.
No no Aksai Chin in mention,I mean AP from west end to east end PLA withdrew.

But china says that india has occupied South tibet and unwilling to even recognize that as disputed terettory.
There is no south Tibet officially just southern parts of 4 Chinese counties are now under Indian control.
 
.
No no Aksai Chin in mention,I mean AP from west end to east end PLA withdrew.


There is no south Tibet officially just southern parts of 4 Chinese counties are now under Indian control.

And I think it will remain as such.The best course of action would be that we Indians let go our claim over the AksaiChin and you guys in turn forfeit yours over Arunachal Pradesh,win-win for both of our countries.
 
.
But china says that india has occupied South tibet and unwilling to even recognize that as disputed terettory.

Obviously a political ploy. China does that so it has "leverage" over India with regards to border negotiations. :agree:

Btw, 1962 war ended in a cease fire, nobody gained anything, there was no defeat or win, can you show us any surrender paper? Every war has some POWs, that means nothing. China never won any war with any country. :)
1962 defeat is a western propaganda



A war where China inflicted casualties against India at a rate of 5:1, where China acquired 40K sq km of land, where China captured thousands of Indian POWs without a single Chinese soldier captured, and where Indian "defenders" defied physics by fleeing down the mountain faster than Chinese bullets could travel - all with mounds of photographic and 3rd party confirmation - is not a terrible Indian defeat but pro-China "western propaganda"? The same West that despised communist China at the time? That West? :rofl:

Yet somehow the imaginary border skirmish where India killed 5 billion Chinese troops but no territory changed hands and where India failed to capture a single POW or even have photographic evidence the conflict took place is not Indian propaganda?

:omghaha: The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.
 
Last edited:
.
Obviously a political ploy. China does that so it has "leverage" over India with regards to border negotiations. :agree:





A war where China inflicted casualties against India at a rate of 5:1, where China acquired 40K sq km of land, where China captured thousands of Indian POWs without a single Chinese soldier captured, and where Indian "defenders" defied physics by fleeing down the mountain faster than Chinese bullets could travel - all with mounds of photographic and 3rd party confirmation - is not a terrible Indian defeat but pro-China "western propaganda"? The same West that despised communist China at the time? That West? :rofl:

Yet somehow the imaginary border skirmish where India killed 5 billion Chinese troops but no territory changed hands and where India failed to capture a single POW or even have photographic evidence the conflict took place is not Indian propaganda?

:omghaha: The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.

Huh, our soldiers killed much more of your human wave, CCP is good at hiding facts, china could capture only the soldiers in small isolated posts, Aksai Chin was already under china's control, china built highways there, and the war ended in a unilateral ceasefire declared by china, and they ran away to the pre-war positions, winners don't do that.

Defeat in the sense that our forces could not evict the invading PLA soldiers before they unilaterally withdrew to pre war positions,that's why it's considered to be a defeat,even in India despite the fact that we never proposed a surrender.After all we Indians are very proud people you know.

Pata hai, lekin yeh chini troll facts pe baat nehi karte, khud attack karke humein aggressor bolte hai, Chola Incident ko jhut bolte hai, in trollon ko ulta troll karna padega, nehi to yeh log aisehi irritatingly behave karenge.
 
.
Huh, our soldiers killed much more of your human wave, CCP is good at hiding facts, china could capture only the soldiers in small isolated posts, Aksai Chin was already under china's control, china built highways there, and the war ended in a unilateral ceasefire declared by china, and they ran away to the pre-war positions, winners don't do that.



Pata hai, lekin yeh chini troll facts pe baat nehi karte, khud attack karke humein aggressor bolte hai, Chola Incident ko jhut bolte hai, in trollon ko ulta troll karna padega, nehi to yeh log aisehi irritatingly behave karenge.

Arey Mr Sean Connery, :D ,abhi is Hindi ka kya chakkar hain??Amio to Bangali apnar e moto.

On topic,of course Indian soldiers inflicted very heavy toll on the advancing PLA waves as they were fighting a defensive war and only thing that kept them from inflicting even more casualties among PLA ranks was lack of ammunition.If we go by the accounts of late Brigadier General John Dalvi,many of the Indian formations were supplied with just pouch ammunition,which means they only had about 100-150 rounds per every man and that's it!Because even the .303 rounds were in short supply,can you believe that??!!And here,many Chinese claim that we were the ones who attacked first!!And then,I guess it's futile to expect logical replies from such people. You remember the discussion we were having when Mr Maxwell had made the report public and the arguments presented by Mr Dragon??

. I always dreamt of A Russia-China-India axis against supremacy of usa and nato.

Then sorry to say but you are just another of those idealist fools,nothing more and nothing less.

Obviously a political ploy. China does that so it has "leverage" over India with regards to border negotiations. :agree:





A war where China inflicted casualties against India at a rate of 5:1, where China acquired 40K sq km of land, where China captured thousands of Indian POWs without a single Chinese soldier captured, and where Indian "defenders" defied physics by fleeing down the mountain faster than Chinese bullets could travel - all with mounds of photographic and 3rd party confirmation - is not a terrible Indian defeat but pro-China "western propaganda"? The same West that despised communist China at the time? That West? :rofl:

Yet somehow the imaginary border skirmish where India killed 5 billion Chinese troops but no territory changed hands and where India failed to capture a single POW or even have photographic evidence the conflict took place is not Indian propaganda?

:omghaha: The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.

Wrong.In fact it was the other way round you moron.It's the Indian Army which inflicted heavier casualties on the PLA human waves.5:1 my @rse,just in the Battle of Rezang La alone,PLA suffered more than a thousand casualties in the hands of just a couple of hundred poorly armed Indian soldiers,who were aarmed only with WWII era bolt action rifles and pouch ammunition.

But believe whatever you want to,what else can be expected out of a CCP propaganda bot who is only good at defecating through his mouth and ruin the threads with his filth.

The truth is Indians themselves (even including @DRAY) believe the Indian Army, when the Indian Army says they can never hope to match China by any conventional or non-conventional means.

This hurts them a lot. Because they know it's true.

And despite trying to attack us while we were in the middle of a famine in 1962, they were easily defeated by even a starving China.

Today it's out of the question, the tables have turned completely.

Some real display of the fabled Chinese IQ I see here!!The level of ignorance is simply mind blowing!!
 
.
What do you think. China will defeat India?

If I have to bet my dollars I would bet on India in any India v/s China one on one war. (No Chinese request for Pakistan support).

Which is better in your opinion IA or PLA? and why?
chinees are much better now bro
 
. .
Better than an another country whose president advised to eat grass for a century to become a nuclear power....
dude our public much more better then indians our governement poor but not we are

And so are we bro.
ofcourse but they are better then you much better india have no match with them they are growing too fast
 
.
dude our public much more better then indians our governement poor but not we are


ofcourse but they are better then you much better india have no match with them they are growing too fast

Well,I understand what you are trying to say and we do not deny that either.But our border regions consists of treacherous mountains,which gives the defender a big advantage.The same kind of advantage that your army had enjoyed in the Kargil conflict.But yes,if there was no Himalayan ranges between separating India and China,then we would be in a much dire and hopeless situation.But the mountains tip the balance to our favor since all we need to do is to hold them off till cease fire.
 
.
On what basis did you call me a fool?
How can you say that every point you are putting forward is correct. Don't you get what is the use of a forum?
Just pick up a dictionary there is a difference between dream and Reckon.
You Depressive Cunt.
Arey Mr Sean Connery, :D ,abhi is Hindi ka kya chakkar hain??Amio to Bangali apnar e moto.

On topic,of course Indian soldiers inflicted very heavy toll on the advancing PLA waves as they were fighting a defensive war and only thing that kept them from inflicting even more casualties among PLA ranks was lack of ammunition.If we go by the accounts of late Brigadier General John Dalvi,many of the Indian formations were supplied with just pouch ammunition,which means they only had about 100-150 rounds per every man and that's it!Because even the .303 rounds were in short supply,can you believe that??!!And here,many Chinese claim that we were the ones who attacked first!!And then,I guess it's futile to expect logical replies from such people. You remember the discussion we were having when Mr Maxwell had made the report public and the arguments presented by Mr Dragon??



Then sorry to say but you are just another of those idealist fools,nothing more and nothing less.



Wrong.In fact it was the other way round you moron.It's the Indian Army which inflicted heavier casualties on the PLA human waves.5:1 my @rse,just in the Battle of Rezang La alone,PLA suffered more than a thousand casualties in the hands of just a couple of hundred poorly armed Indian soldiers,who were aarmed only with WWII era bolt action rifles and pouch ammunition.

But believe whatever you want to,what else can be expected out of a CCP propaganda bot who is only good at defecating through his mouth and ruin the threads with his filth.



Some real display of the fabled Chinese IQ I see here!!The level of ignorance is simply mind blowing!!

On what basis did you call me a fool?
How can you say that every point you are putting forward is correct. Don't you get what is the use of a forum?
Just pick up a dictionary there is a difference between dream and Reckon.
You Depressive Cunt.
Arey Mr Sean Connery, :D ,abhi is Hindi ka kya chakkar hain??Amio to Bangali apnar e moto.

On topic,of course Indian soldiers inflicted very heavy toll on the advancing PLA waves as they were fighting a defensive war and only thing that kept them from inflicting even more casualties among PLA ranks was lack of ammunition.If we go by the accounts of late Brigadier General John Dalvi,many of the Indian formations were supplied with just pouch ammunition,which means they only had about 100-150 rounds per every man and that's it!Because even the .303 rounds were in short supply,can you believe that??!!And here,many Chinese claim that we were the ones who attacked first!!And then,I guess it's futile to expect logical replies from such people. You remember the discussion we were having when Mr Maxwell had made the report public and the arguments presented by Mr Dragon??



Then sorry to say but you are just another of those idealist fools,nothing more and nothing less.



Wrong.In fact it was the other way round you moron.It's the Indian Army which inflicted heavier casualties on the PLA human waves.5:1 my @rse,just in the Battle of Rezang La alone,PLA suffered more than a thousand casualties in the hands of just a couple of hundred poorly armed Indian soldiers,who were aarmed only with WWII era bolt action rifles and pouch ammunition.

But believe whatever you want to,what else can be expected out of a CCP propaganda bot who is only good at defecating through his mouth and ruin the threads with his filth.



Some real display of the fabled Chinese IQ I see here!!The level of ignorance is simply mind blowing!!
 
.
On what basis did you call me a fool?
How can you say that every point you are putting forward is correct. Don't you get what is the use of a forum?
Just pick up a dictionary there is a difference between dream and Reckon.
You Depressive Cunt.

:D :D Ha ha ha ha..............."Depressive Cunt"!!That's rich coming from a five year old on dope!!Listen kiddo,what I'm putting forward,which you call mere points,are simple facts.And I do not need a dictionary boyo,because I know exactly what you meant.I called you an idealist fool because you dream of such an Utopian la la land where India and China could form a reliance in present situation.If you had used the word recon instead,I would have called you something worse,you can god damn bet your @rse on that.

And by the way,I still remember that it was you who had posted a stupid one liner in a Rafale related thread and when I asked for an explanation,you simply ran away.I hope you have grown a spine since then and won't run away again this time.
 
Last edited:
. .
:D :D Ha ha ha ha..............."Depressive Cunt"!!That's rich coming from a five year old on dope!!Listen kiddo,what I'm putting forward,which you call mere points,are simple facts.And I do not need a dictionary boyo,because I know exactly what you meant.I called you an idealist fool because you dream of such an Utopian la la land where India and China could form a reliance in present situation.If you had used the word recon instead,I would have called you something worse,you can god damn bet your @rse on that.

And by the way,I still remember that it was you who had posted a stupid one liner in a Rafale related thread and when I asked for an explanation,you simply ran away.I hope you have grown a spine since then and won't run away again this time.
Maybe I didn't reply because I agreed to your point or u didn't bother to entertain the troll. I am not 5 year old.i am 18. I was not on dope.As I said I have the liberty to put my views forward You are not an analyst to judge me and pass your comments. I called you A cunt because you were acting like a cunt.As I said I didnt use the word Reckon *. The point I was trying to make is that the west wants India and China to go on war so that our GDP drops down. As these two countries can only challenge the west.no country is a friend they just need hard cash.One day chinese bullet trains will run on Indian soil,maybe we will be friends. I am not a total tosser,or too idealistic.As I am well aware of realities.
 
.
And I think it will remain as such.The best course of action would be that we Indians let go our claim over the AksaiChin and you guys in turn forfeit yours over Arunachal Pradesh,win-win for both of our countries.
No win-win for you know Aksai Chin is garbage and some thing really good to the south of McMahon line just like what I have said.
What you have got is not yours and what is not in our hands remains ours.
 
.
In 1962, the United States and Russia rare support for India's together, but, the result?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom