20,000 Muslims killed in Burma by police

[OrionHunter]

Question No 1 - Where is the OIC (Organization Of Islamic Cooperation)?
Answer - Poodle faking, as always.

Question No 2 - Where is the so called 'Muslim Ummah'?
Answer - they're busy fighting their own internal conflicts.

Question No 3 - Where is the link to the OPs outrageous claim that 20,000 Muslims have been killed?
Answer - There's none because it's a bundle of lies! Not more than 80 have been killed so far. Check it out here

Question No 4 - Why do some posters here love to exaggerate Muslim killings in other countries?
Answer - It's a persecution complex of some who love to continue living in self sympathy.

 

[Icewolf]

Question No 1 - Where is the OIC (Organization Of Islamic Cooperation)?
Answer - Poodle faking, as always.

Question No 2 - Where is the so called 'Muslim Ummah'?
Answer - they're busy fighting their own internal conflicts.

Question No 3 - Where is the link to the OPs outrageous claim that 20,000 Muslims have been killed?
Answer - There's none because it's a bundle of lies! Not more than 80 have been killed so far. Check it out here

Question No 4 - Why do some posters here love to exaggerate Muslim killings in other countries?
Answer - It's a persecution complex of some who love to continue living in self sympathy.

1. Where is UN and UNHRC?

2. What Muslim Ummah? There is none.

3. You're disgusting. Whether it's 20,000 or 80, Muslims were killed

4. And magically, you know it's exxagerated.

 

[Developereo]

What's fascinating is the predictable reaction of the Indians.

Whenever Muslims get killed around the world, these Indians celebrate and defend the killers. Beyond the human compassion, one might have thought they might express solidarity with Rohingyas because they are ethnic Bengalis, but the Indian hatred for Muslims overshadows any ethnic links.

As for the media, the most glaring absence is of Al Jazeera. They have sold out so utterly in order to chase Western audiences, that they parrot the Western media agenda letter for letter. If the Western media doesn't care, neither will Al Jazeera. The organization which started out proclaiming itself as "the alternative view" has degenerated into a parrot. Alternative American news sites offer more diversity of opinion than does Al Jazeera.

 

[zakriaarshad]

Killing of a single muslim will pinch our heart. But if the new has been given by some bangali or bangladeshi media than every one should think 1000 times before believing. They are used to create violence, exaggerate facts and figures,pretending them to be innocent and blaming others , while filling their "all pockets'' for thier own ends.

 

[Norboo]

1. Where is UN and UNHRC?

Where is the OIC?

2. What Muslim Ummah? There is none.

Really? Delivering lengthy speeches about the Unity of Muslim Ummah does not tire leaders, Imams and scholars all over the world. Most Muslims talks about this unity. But there's more disunity today than there ever was because of local nationalism and sectarian beliefs in the name of Islam.

3. You're disgusting. Whether it's 20,000 or 80, Muslims were killed

I thought there's a huge difference between 80 and 20,000. Your argument is lame. And if you feel so terrible that it's Muslims who were killed (and that's what got your goat) then did you flip your lid like what you just did when Uighur Muslims were killed by the Chinese and continue doing so? You won't because you're a hypocrite and what the Chinese do to Muslims is acceptable to you. Because the Chinese are involved and not Burmese!

4. And magically, you know it's exxagerated.

Obviously it's exaggerated. And if you can't see the difference between 80 and 20,000, then I have nothing more to say.

 

[Valek]

Bad mouth America and Americans every single day and complain when they do not come to your aid. This forum makes me laugh.

 

[harpoon]

What's fascinating is the predictable reaction of the Indians.

Whenever Muslims get killed around the world, these Indians celebrate and defend the killers. Beyond the human compassion, one might have thought they might express solidarity with Rohingyas because they are ethnic Bengalis, but the Indian hatred for Muslims overshadows any ethnic links.

As for the media, the most glaring absence is of Al Jazeera. They have sold out so utterly in order to chase Western audiences, that they parrot the Western media agenda letter for letter. If the Western media doesn't care, neither will Al Jazeera. The organization which started out proclaiming itself as "the alternative view" has degenerated into a parrot. Alternative American news sites offer more diversity of opinion than does Al Jazeera.

Actually Indians like me are fascinated the shameless hypocracy shown by Pakistanis and Bangladeshis here. Bcs they were the same one who cheered on SL Buddhists to kill mostly Hindu/Christian Tamils. A lot of Pakistanis here were very proud that their country supplied the heavy arms and ammunition that Srilankans used to carry out the attrocites on Tamil population..but now when the tables have turned and Muslims are at the receiving end of another set of Buddhists in Burma, its very bad and want every damn organization in the world to intervene.

Bad mouth America and Americans every single day and complain when they do not come to your aid. This forum makes me laugh.

Perils of being a superpower...Damn if you do,Damn if you don't.

 

[OrionHunter]

1. Where is UN and UNHRC?
You're disgusting. Whether it's 20,000 or 80, Muslims were killed

Ice bhai! You've got me wrong! I never condoned the killing of even a single Muslim! (Or for that matter a Hindu, Sikh, Christian or anyone else). What I meant was that reporting must be objective and confirmed. This report is neither. Killing 20,000 is akin to a holocaust! You think the world would not have taken notice? You think the UNHRC would not have taken cognizance of this if the report was true?

However, the UNHRC must inquire into the deaths of Muslims in Burma and and do whatever is necessary to quell the disturbances with the help of the Burmese government to avoid further bloodshed.

 

[Developereo]

Actually Indians like me are fascinated the shameless hypocracy shown by Pakistanis and Bangladeshis here. Bcs they were the same one who cheered on SL Buddhists to kill mostly Hindu/Christian Tamils. A lot of Pakistanis here were very proud that their country supplied the heavy arms and ammunition that Srilankans used to carry out the attrocites on Tamil population..but now when the tables have turned and Muslims are at the receiving end of another set of Buddhists in Burma, its very bad and want every damn organization in the world to intervene.

So now you are equating an anti-terrorism campaign in Sri lanka to the ethnic cleansing in Burma?

The Sri Lankan government was fighting LTTE terrorists and the Indian government claims to be one of the foremost supporters of Sri Lanka in fighting the LTTE.

If you're going to complain about the Sri Lanka situation, better start in Delhi.

 

[harpoon]

So now you are equating an anti-terrorism campaign in Sri lanka to the ethnic cleansing in Burma?

How anti terrorism campaign justify shelling of civilian areas?

Anyways I remember many Pakistani/Bangladeshi posters here calling on SL to deport all Tamils to India and Tamils have lived in SL for a longer period that Rohingayas in Burma.

The Sri Lankan government was fighting LTTE terrorists and the Indian government claims to be one of the foremost supporters of Sri Lanka in fighting the LTTE.

If you're going to complain about the Sri Lanka situation, better start in Delhi.

LTTE sprang out of the same problems that Rohingyas are facing in Burma..India only acted as the catalyst.

 

[jha]

20,000...?

The last toll was 82 and it included Budhists killed by Muslims too...

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

What's fascinating is the predictable reaction of the Indians.

Why wouldn't it be for the dishonest Pakistani elite

Whenever Muslims get killed around the world, these Indians celebrate and defend the killers.

Er.....did even single Indian poster support Burmanese military action?

Beyond the human compassion, one might have thought they might express solidarity with Rohingyas because they are ethnic Bengalis, but the Indian hatred for Muslims overshadows any ethnic links.

The obvious crocodile tears and projecting India as an enemy of Muslims





Seriously! people need to stop exxagerating numbers, as trivializes the issue.

its like cry wolf story, when really such a large massacre occurs, no one will believe you.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Actually Indians like me are fascinated the shameless hypocracy shown by Pakistanis and Bangladeshis here. Bcs they were the same one who cheered on SL Buddhists to kill mostly Hindu/Christian Tamils. A lot of Pakistanis here were very proud that their country supplied the heavy arms and ammunition that Srilankans used to carry out the attrocites on Tamil population..but now when the tables have turned and Muslims are at the receiving end of another set of Buddhists in Burma, its very bad and want every damn organization in the world to intervene.



Perils of being a superpower...Damn if you do,Damn if you don't.

You hit the nail on its head!!

 

[IND151]

RIP to dead

 

[Bhairava]

So now you are equating an anti-terrorism campaign in Sri lanka to the ethnic cleansing in Burma?

\.

To the Burmese the Rohingyas are terrorists and its their internal matter just like the Tamils were terrorists to the Lankans and it was their "internal" matter.

But then hypocrisy is your middle name and hence no surprise.

Moreover courtesy the Burmese, we realize once again, how meaningless, hollow the word "Ummah" is.