What's new

2 U.S. carriers deployed

Enemy

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
0
WASHINGTON--Two aircraft carrier strike groups of the U.S. Navy's 7th Fleet have been deployed since mid-September to the Western Pacific in an apparent attempt to keep the activities of the Chinese military in check amid growing Japan-China tension over the Senkaku Islands.

The two nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are the USS George Washington, based in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, and the USS John C. Stennis, based on the U.S. west coast. The command of the 7th Fleet is also located in Yokosuka.

It is unusual for the U.S. Navy to simultaneously deploy two strike groups each comprising an aircraft carrier and escort ships to the West Pacific. Analysts believe the move is aimed to hold the Chinese military in check in light of the recent tension between Tokyo and Beijing over the islands in Okinawa Prefecture in the East China Sea. The deployment is also believed to be a response to China's launch of its first aircraft carrier in September.

According to Strategic Forecasting Inc., a U.S. private information firm known as Stratfor, and others, the George Washington Strike Group sailed northwest after training off Guam, arriving in waters east of Taiwan on Wednesday. The Stennis was deployed near the Senkaku Islands on Sept. 26 before passing through the South China Sea, and is currently operating in waters near Malaysia, according to Stratfor and others.

Japanese government sources agree that the deployment of the two strike groups was prompted by the tension between Japan and China.

The U.S. government has stated that the Senkaku Islands "clearly" fall under Article 5 of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty, which requires Washington to defend Japan in the event of an armed attack.

Deploying two aircraft carriers is "a demonstration of the United States' resolve to act in line with Article 5" and to support the Japan-U.S. alliance, a senior official of Japan's Defense Ministry said.


The deployment was preceded by requests from Japan through unofficial diplomatic channels for concrete U.S. action in connection with the upsurge in Japan-China tension, the official said.

The United States has publicly called for both China and Japan to maintain cool heads when dealing with the issue.

According to a high-ranking Foreign Ministry official, many in the government believe the U.S. aircraft carrier deployment is a sign that Washington believes Tokyo should deal effectively with the dispute to reach a prompt resolution.

One of the few times the United States has deployed two aircraft carriers to the West Pacific was during the Taiwan Straits crisis in the spring of 1996, when tension between China and Taiwan skyrocketed.

(Oct. 6, 2012)

2 U.S. carriers deployed to W. Pacific : National : DAILY YOMIURI ONLINE (The Daily Yomiuri)
 
Self comforting Indian with text highlight in bold. :rofl:

Please try to post something which has relevancy.

On topic, I think, US is using the carrot and stick policy. On one hand it is saying China to cooperate more with US in military affairs, on the other, it is using its invincible military force to intimidate and coerce China to accept what US is saying. BTW, US is also giving China the face saving space in public as it does not intend to make the weaker Chinese military lose its face. This is why no mainstream media in the US is publishing the news of such bold military step US is posing against China. In other words, US expects the Chinese military to ultimately accept defeat after realizing that it can do nothing against a superior military force. But Chinese military is also given a space to retreat without losing its face.

China is now treated like Iran but the only difference is Iran is not given the chance to save its face. And why not? China is not much powerful than Iran in terms of military except China is possessing a few nuclear warheads which China will never dare use against anybody. Yet Iran has more self respect and is not showing interests to make compromises while I think Chinese with less guts would certainly make compromises.

This is why Chinese military is so unusually silent in the recent days.
 
Yeah, if only a thousand kilometer away is called near the Diaoyu Islands. BTW the USS John C. Stennis is on a scheduled passing through on her way to the gulf and the USS George Washington is probably coming out from Yokosuka base to 'meet' her to show intimidation. Yawn.
 
One of the few times the United States has deployed two aircraft carriers to the West Pacific was during the Taiwan Straits crisis in the spring of 1996, when tension between China and Taiwan skyrocketed.
the deploy is getting farer and farer.from China...........Those USA carriers will be a dead duck sitting in the middle of Taiwan straight.

Godfather is coming, sons cheerleading. Happy?
 
Please try to post something which has relevancy.

On topic, I think, US is using the carrot and stick policy. On one hand it is saying China to cooperate more with US in military affairs, on the other, it is using its invincible military force to intimidate and coerce China to accept what US is saying. BTW, US is also giving China the face saving space in public as it does not intend to make the weaker Chinese military lose its face. This is why no mainstream media in the US is publishing the news of such bold military step US is posing against China. In other words, US expects the Chinese military to ultimately accept defeat after realizing that it can do nothing against a superior military force. But Chinese military is also given a space to retreat without losing its face.

China is now treated like Iran but the only difference is Iran is not given the chance to save its face. And why not? China is not much powerful than Iran in terms of military except China is possessing a few nuclear warheads which China will never dare use against anybody. Yet Iran has more self respect and is not showing interests to make compromises while I think Chinese with less guts would certainly make compromises.

This is why Chinese military is so unusually silent in the recent days.

Carrot and stick... the island is belong to China why China need to accept what US is saying, as for stick, we didn't back down our claim, our navy still patroling the island, dare them to take initiative to fire at us...LMAO.

US encounters is nothing new to us since 1996, spy plane collision in 2003, US spyship get close to our submarine base in Hainan... American don't come here to give a face saving as you Indians are so naive to believe. this kind of encounter will continue in the future until we will be ready to return their own favor..for now we just be quiet and bite our time to build a Navy that can answer USN.

Americans are just Huns of ancient time to us, we have waited for over hundred years before chase them out of step plain, dealing with American is the same, there is no need to be rush...when we reach the Nuke parity and other conventinal parity...they will have alot to answer to us.
 
Carrot and stick... the island is belong to China why China need to accept what US is saying, as for stick, we didn't back down our claim, our navy still patroling the island, dare them to take initiative to fire at us...LMAO.

US encounters is nothing new to us since 1996, spy plane collision in 2003, US spyship get close to our submarine base in Hainan... American don't come here to give a face saving as you Indians are so naive to believe. this kind of encounter will continue in the future until we will be ready to return their own favor..for now we just be quiet and bite our time to build a Navy that can answer USN.

Americans are just Huns of ancient time to us, we have waited for over hundred years before chase them out of step plain, dealing with American is the same, there is no need to be rush...when we reach the Nuke parity and other conventinal parity...they will have alot to answer to us.


why you are crying like this? this is an international forum any one can post any kinda defence related articles. so why are you dragging India into this?.... are you afraid ?..... please complain Admin's against the op if you hot problem with the article...


don't rant here.
 
China already sent a fleet of 7 surface warships and unknown number of submarines to surround the aircraft carrier battlegroups!

NHK

Phoenix TV



We continue to invade "Japanese" territorial waters again but nobody can stop our bullying!

Chinese surveillance ships enter Japanese territorial waters again

Chinese vessels patrolling Diaoyutai waters: Japanese media

AJ201210040050M.jpg


Four Chinese maritime surveillance vessels were spotted in waters near the disputed Diaoyutai Islands Friday, according to Japanese media reports, in what may become a routine occurrence in the near future.

It was the fifth straight day that Chinese surveillance ships entered waters adjacent to what Japan calls its territorial waters, Japan Kyodo news agency said.

A Hong Kong China News Agency report said it may become routine for China's surveillance ships to patrol waters surrounding the Diaoyutai island chain in the East China Sea, which has been under Japan's control since 1972 but is also claimed by Taiwan and China.

Hong Lei, a spokesman for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said Wednesday that China's maritime surveillance ships will continue to patrol the Diaoyutais to safeguard its rights.

Citing Japanese Coast Guard authorities, the Kyodo report said crew members aboard one of those Chinese vessels responded to a Japanese order to stay away from the area by saying over a wireless device that they were performing official duties in waters under its jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, the Japanese Ministry of Defense said Thursday that a flotilla of seven Chinese warships were spotted in the open sea between the main island of Japan's Okinawa archipelago and Miyakojima Island that day.

The ministry said the fleet, composed of destroyers, frigates, submarines and disaster relief craft, was navigating in waters some 110 kilometers northeast of Miyakojima when it was spotted.

Japanese media reports said the passage of the Chinese fleet in the area might be aimed at checking the unusual convergence of three U.S. battle groups in the West Pacific in recent days.
 
Please try to post something which has relevancy.

On topic, I think, US is using the carrot and stick policy. On one hand it is saying China to cooperate more with US in military affairs, on the other, it is using its invincible military force to intimidate and coerce China to accept what US is saying. BTW, US is also giving China the face saving space in public as it does not intend to make the weaker Chinese military lose its face. This is why no mainstream media in the US is publishing the news of such bold military step US is posing against China. In other words, US expects the Chinese military to ultimately accept defeat after realizing that it can do nothing against a superior military force. But Chinese military is also given a space to retreat without losing its face.

China is now treated like Iran but the only difference is Iran is not given the chance to save its face. And why not? China is not much powerful than Iran in terms of military except China is possessing a few nuclear warheads which China will never dare use against anybody. Yet Iran has more self respect and is not showing interests to make compromises while I think Chinese with less guts would certainly make compromises.

This is why Chinese military is so unusually silent in the recent days.

LOL.. China military is not much powerful than Iran? Then India military is equal to Cambodia. Looks like Indian is very desperate to play down China military supremacy in Asia.
 
China already sent a fleet of 7 surface warships and unknown number of submarines to surround the aircraft carrier battlegroups!

NHK

Phoenix TV



We continue to invade "Japanese" territorial waters again but nobody can stop our bullying!

Does anyone want to doubt whether this SinoChallenged dude isn't Chinese now?

What kinda Chinese would characterize the claiming of Diaoyu as "bullying"?

This guy belongs in the insane asylum.
 
False flagged is flushing here. As to Sinochallenger,I could smell he is a Chinese.
 
U.S.A. never "clearly" said Diaoyu belongs to Japan in the last years or it would fall under their treaty. In fact they never even implied anything of that sort.

All they said is the treaty still stand IF Japan is attacked, but they avoided the question if they support the thieves claims saying its "not their business" afraid of displeasing China. So they can still weasel out later saying its just disputed claims on Chinese islands and send Japan a 30$ Million "sorry you are on your own" good bye letter like they did with the Philippine "super tight best buddy defence treaty".
 
U.S.A. never "clearly" said Diaoyu belongs to Japan in the last years or it would fall under their treaty. In fact they never even implied anything of that sort.

All they said is the treaty still stand IF Japan is attacked, but they avoided the question if they support the thieves claims saying its "not their business" afraid of displeasing China. So they can still weasel out later saying its just disputed claims on Chinese islands and send Japan a 30$ Million "sorry you are on your own" good bye letter like they did with the Philippine "super tight best buddy defence treaty".
You are wrong. USA explicitly said Diaoyu Island is covered by the Japan-USA defense treaty in an effort to intimidate China. But we ignored their intimidation and invaded "Japanese" territorial waters. Now they look stupid so they are sending their carriers to try to intimidate again, but now they've fallen right into our submarine trap!
 
You are wrong. USA explicitly said Diaoyu Island is covered by the Japan-USA defense treaty in an effort to intimidate China. But we ignored their intimidation and invaded "Japanese" territorial waters. Now they look stupid so they are sending their carriers to try to intimidate again, but now they've fallen right into our submarine trap!

Who knows if your submarine is being tailed by another.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom