LOL. I did not know that aphorisms acquire meaning only on producing of acquaintances. We all know you have a great many acquaintances, but in all your debates I have seen you clobbered soundly and shown for a fool.
Of course this must be reliable testimony. And you must be considered the most reliable of witnesses, given your record anywhere, there on PTH or here. Were you ever anything but a silent spectator anywhere? Except for now?
For all your protestations of dignity in discourse and claiming people to be gutter-mouthed, you have been quite a gutter mouth yourself, have you not? Calling people guttersnipe, pond scum, stupid, and the likes? Was it not just earlier this week you came in defense of liberty of speech of Ms. Roy and deriding people for calling her names, and then merrily continued to apply labels yourself?
As opposed to appeals to my illustrious friends to rape, or better still, gang-rape a woman? But perhaps in your dictionary and vocabulary, such things are of equal weight with guttersnipes, pond scum or stupid. I am glad you remember them so well, by the way. Occasionally one is beset with doubt; why use such mild terms against monsters with such rhino hides? So now we know that the monsters do react.
Appealing to authorities, name dropping, boasting about acquaintances, these are indications of a groupie, is it not?
Errr, no, not really.
These might be labels for those who have a sense of their worth and station in life. Even for those who have an exaggerated sense of their worth and their station in life. But not indications of a groupie. For that, you might try the Urban Dictionary
A young woman, often under age, who seeks to achieve status by having sex with rock musicians, roadies, security, and other band-related guys.
Or the Free Dictionary
1. A fan, especially a young woman, who follows a rock group around on tours;
2. An enthusiastic supporter or follower;
The other two definitions are here:
groupie - definition of groupie by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
As a label it is more appropriate for you.
You cannot imagine how reassuring that statement is. As wrong and as stupid as ever.
As far as I can remember, I have never claimed to belong to any group nor called on anyone even on this forum to my defense.
LOL.
Do you have to claim it to be seen as being what you are?
What would I be without being on Chowk or PTH or Defence.pk? Are you being serious? I mean there must be a limit to the amount of delusion one can have. You get your sense of self-worth by being on debate forums? Does this argument leave anyone in any doubt as to your vacuousness?
Again, very gladdening to read, since I said exactly the opposite. At least you can claim consistency as a redeeming virtue.
What have you done? Used your father's position to gain entry in corridors of power and then what? Have you anything to show for yourself at all? People like you represent everything that is wrong with this country. The very reason this country finds itself in such morass.
Heh. My father did not even know what I was doing in defence. And no one knew who he was while I was in service. So much for your insight. And my work had nothing to do with the corridors of power. As it happens, I am enjoying these descriptions; even I myself had little to do with the corridors of power. My work was applied technology, and those in the corridors of power rarely came into view, except to pose for photographs in awkward positions. Just shows how little you know about me. Reassuringly so, I must add.
Oh driven away from PTH, were you? Along with the other nutcases and Islamic fundos? I have not been there for some time. Glad they housecleaned.
Umm, consistency again.
I mentioned some names: apparently you had only a momentary presence on PTH, or none at all. We were all members of that very small group that debated the role of the various players in the independence movement, and arrived at a consensus about the events which led to partition and independence which is still there in the archives, and treasured by those who were observers.
Obviously you were not one. Otherwise, you would have known that none of the names I mentioned were Islamic fundos, or fundos of any kind. But then, from your point of view, we would be nutcases, right? And we left PTH in 2009. It appears from what you write that you have not been there since earlier.
By the way, I keep getting enticed back by both RHR and RR, but have not succumbed; the discourse there is too polluted for any decent person any longer.
Lastly, we left because PTH wouldn't clean house. But then, being consistent, and always in the wrong direction, is your own special virtue, isn't it?