1965 war: Pivotal actions of Pakistani armed forces

[Signalian]

Word to word copy of paragraph from Pakistani 'men of steel' book

I haven't read that book neither have your provided any source, so cannot substantiate your claim however if what you say is true then good job by David Higgins for going after the correct source to include in his book. Also if you Take other citations that you have provided as images in your posts from David's book, then take this citation as true also.

BS.
I always use the word 'Panzer' for any Indian armoured or tank unit or strike corps as I love the word Panzer much more.

More misinformation again.

@The Eagle , control the troll, please. He is spreading misinformation using made-up terms.

 

[Areesh]

More misinformation again.

@The Eagle , control the troll, please. He is spreading misinformation using made-up terms.

Typical sanghi confused moron

Loving nazis and Israel at the same time

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

The bravery of Pakistani Soldiers in both 1965 and 1971 is appreciated

 

[Signalian]

The bravery of Pakistani Soldiers in both 1965 and 1971 is appreciated

Mostly at Regimental level, the officers in the field area coordinated well with their soldiers and other ranks, its the General staff that could have shown improvement in tactical and strategic decision making

 

[Cuirassier]

Mostly at Regimental level, the officers in the field area coordinated well with their soldiers and other ranks, its the General staff that could have shown improvement in tactical and strategic decision making

General André Beaufre on the Pakistan Army " They have many good captains but no good generals".

 

[Tipu7]

yes.

https://www.pdfdrive.com/m48-patton...stani-war-1965-osprey-duel-71-d158296552.html

Thank you very much ...

 

[The Eagle]

More misinformation again.

@The Eagle , control the troll, please. He is spreading misinformation using made-up terms.

More you try to put some sense into a troll, the more it feels like a life line for him. Splash.

 

[ghazi52]

Indo-Pak War of 1965
L-R Gen Rana 1 Corp Kharian, AM Asghar Khan, Gen Ayub Khan and Gen Musa Khan

 

[Signalian]

Indo-Pak War of 1965
L-R Gen Rana 1 Corp Kharian, AM Asghar Khan, Gen Ayub Khan and Gen Musa Khan

They seem so relaxed and chill, its like they know they will thwart the attack, which was eventually thwarted. They don't look bothered that they have been attacked by an Army greater in size and strength than them.

Some black beret officers of Armored Corps are standing behind them.

Thank you very much ...

When you read the book, you might find that Higgins seems to have sided with Indians to brush off the superior myth of the M-47 and M-48 Patton Tanks.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

They seem so relaxed and chill, its like they know they will thwart the attack, which was eventually thwarted. They don't look bothered that they have been attacked by an Army greater in size and strength than them.

Some black beret officers of Armored Corps are standing behind them.


When you read the book, you might find that Higgins seems to have sided with Indians to brush off the superior myth of the M-47 and M-48 Patton Tanks.

Sir do you have pdf of men of steel?

 

[Signalian]

Sir do you have pdf of men of steel?

sorry, my friend i dont

 

[MM_Haider]

Suggestion:

Can we have a group of volunteers to update wikipedia pages related to Indo Pak conflicts ... there seems to be Indian hegemony and very less Pakistani PoV is available there .. everyone please comment!!

@mods you can create a separate thread if you feel a need..

 

[Cuirassier]

Suggestion:

Can we have a group of volunteers to update wikipedia pages related to Indo Pak conflicts ... there seems to be Indian hegemony and very less Pakistani PoV is available there .. everyone please comment!!

@mods you can create a separate thread if you feel a need..

Can't do that, majority editors are Indian and they'll reverse any change.

 

[MM_Haider]

Can't do that, majority editors are Indian and they'll reverse any change.

It is like India is re-writing history.. Pakistan should take necessary measures at state level.. Wikipedia is fund starved .. fund it some half a million dollars and have their regional office in Pakistan.. for me this is more important than karachi cleanliness drive

 

[Cuirassier]

Pakistani narrative on it's military history is very poor/non-existent, hence Wiki takes Indian references for most accounts. ISPR doesn't encourage such stuff and neither do our own writers have the knowledge of mil history with authentic statistics of losses et cetera. As long as this information vacuum exists, the only contribution will be from Haqqani and Siddiqa types, as in experts in whining and nothing much. Feel free to visit my Twitter, I am striving to plug the gaps and present our case as it should be.

It is like India is re-writing history.. Pakistan should take necessary measures at state level.. Wikipedia is fund starved .. fund it some half a million dollars and have their regional office in Pakistan.. for me this is more important than karachi cleanliness drive