Signalian
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 10,608
- Reaction score
- 305
- Country
- Location
yes.Got this book in pdf?
https://www.pdfdrive.com/m48-patton...stani-war-1965-osprey-duel-71-d158296552.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes.Got this book in pdf?
He does not mention anywhere that page 75 was cited from any Pakistani source. He has mentioned neutral sources too apart from Indian sources , few are as below.He clearly mentions in his book citations that his source is Pakistani official history book of 6th armoured division (book name Men of steel)
Anyways this:
your "panzer" corps attack stalled at chawinda, and it was stopped not becoz indian wanted it to have a break but becoz it was pummeled hard. you can distort history as much as you want but fact is that,, Chawinda was your assal uttar, period.He clearly mentions in his book citations that his source is Pakistani official history book of 6th armoured division (book name Men of steel)
Anyways this:
Our Panzer corps captured 500 sq km in Sialkot by the end of the war
Fuuny thing is that strength of 1 Panzer Corp's 4 panzer regiments on 7th Sep was 178 tanks.
That idiot doesn't have any idea that 1st "Panzer" Corps / 1st Armored Corps - didn't/doesn't exist. This happens when a troll is mindlessly trying to post without any rational thinking.your "panzer" corps attack stalled at chawinda, and it was stopped not becoz indian wanted it to have a break but becoz it was pummeled hard. you can distort history as much as you want but fact is that,, Chawinda was your assal uttar, period.
By Indian estimates - There you go and take your "indian" estimates with you !He clearly list that Men of steel book as one of his sources.
And that is the only book in the whole wide world mentioning 180 Indian tank losses, when I Panzer corps did not even have 180 tanks on it's roster.
View attachment 578252
This from American historian david higginsyour "panzer" corps attack stalled at chawinda, and it was stopped not becoz indian wanted it to have a break but becoz it was pummeled hard. you can distort history as much as you want but fact is that,, Chawinda was your assal uttar, period.
He mentioned the word Indian estimates for the part mentionibg Pakistani losses only.By Indian estimates - There you go and take your "indian" estimates with you !
That idiot doesn't have any idea that 1st "Panzer" Corps / 1st Armored Corps - didn't/doesn't exist. This happens when a troll is mindlessly trying to post without any rational thinking.
Total 70 tank casualties to India and 61 to Pakistan.We lost less than 40 tanks in Chawinda.
Only 28 destroyed tank hulls ended up in Pakistani hands even though the battle was in Pak territory.
Ok.Total 70 tank casualties to India and 61 to Pakistan.
If you want to act blind, that's up to you, there is no mention of Pakistani citation/reference:He mentioned the word Indian estimates for the part mentionibg Pakistani losses only.
lol, your choice of words is uniqueMindless troll plus multiple ID rat
You missed that part
lol, your choice of words is unique
[emoji1787]Well that is a fact
While he is jumping on destroyed tanks, I am sure this guy has lost more IDs on PDF than tanks India lost in its failed offensive in Sialkot sector in 1965 war
ohh how conviniently you missed the 5th Armr Regiment the 62 Cav which was taken from 26 Div and attached with 1st Armr DivHe clearly mentions in his book citations that his source is Pakistani official history book of 6th armoured division (book name Men of steel)
Anyways this:
Our Panzer corps captured 500 sq km in Sialkot by the end of the war
Fuuny thing is that strength of 1 Panzer Corp's 4 panzer regiments on 7th Sep was 178 tanks.