17 per cent of urban India lives in slums: Census

[illusion8]

Its still higher, not 30%.

How much is the % then?

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

I wouldn't expect that huge number from Mumbai of all places.

Slums may look small, but have highest population density.

Mumbai is destination for poor migrants form all over India, so not much of a surprise.

 

[Azazel]

17 per cent of urban India lives in slums: Census


NEW DELHI: Nearly one in every six urban Indian residents lives in a slum, newly released Census data shows. The new numbers are significantly lower than the slum growth that had been projected for India.

"Our own projections were that the all-India slum population would be 27.5% by 2011, so the new data comes as a pleasant surprise," Arun Kumar Misra, secretary in the ministry of housing and urban poverty alleviation, said. The slum populations in individual cities like Mumbai was also lower than expected, Mishra said.

The census defines a slum as "residential areas where dwellings are unfit for human habitation" because they are dilapidated, cramped, poorly ventilated, unclean, or "any combination of these factors which are detrimental to the safety and health", registrar general of India C Chandramouli said.

Roughly 1.37 crore households, or 17.4% of urban Indian households lived in a slum in 2011, data released by the registrar general and census commissioner's office showed. The new data is difficult to compare with previous years, because the 2011 Census covers all 4,041 statutory towns in India, as compared to 2001 when only statutory towns with population over 20,000 were covered. The 2001 data had set India's slum population at 15% of the total population.

The census counted slums notified under various acts, those recognized by governments but not notified, and those that were in no way accepted by state governments, but fit the definition of a slum. Housing and urban poverty alleviation minister Ajay Maken said that the high proportion - over 37% - of slum households in this last, unrecognized, category was a serious problem, and committed to his ministry extending benefits like the Rajiv Awas Yojana to such slums too. "State governments are unwilling to admit to their being more slums in their cities because then they will have to provide these slums basic services like water and drainage," Maken said.

With the exception of sanitation, the indicators on housing amenities for slum and non-slum households in most of India are more similar than most would expect. Over 77% are permanent and 70% are owned, and not rented. Close to half are made up of just one room and most are home to one married couple.

Over 70% of slum households get their water from a tap but just half get water inside their homes. Over 90% get electricity and most use LPG for cooking; 70% have a TV and 10% even a computer. The census data seems to indicate that the "more cellphones than toilets" line might be wrong for urban India: two out of three slum households have a toilet within the premises, while slightly fewer have a mobile phone.

More than one in five urban households in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, West Bengal and Maharashtra lives in a slum. In absolute terms, Maharashtra has the highest number of slum blocks of any state - over 21,000 out of a total of just over 1 lakh for the whole country.

Over a third of India's slum population lives in its 46 million-plus cities. Of the metros, Mumbai has the highest proportion of slum-dwelling households (41.3% of its population). Kolkata is next at nearly 30% with Chennai not far behind. Delhi has 14.6% of its households living in slums while Bangalore is the best off of the five metros at less than 10%.

Among all million-plus cities, Vishakhapatnam has the highest proportion of slums (44.1% of households). However, Census authorities were treating with skepticism the unexplained spurt in slum populations across cities in Andhra Pradesh.

city	Proportion of slum households (%)
Greater Mumbai	41.3
Kolkata	29.6
Chennai	28.5
Delhi	14.6
bangaluru	8.5

I will say that is a big improvement.

BTW,Our OP will conveniently ignore the fact that Pakistan's urban slum dwellers as a percentage of its Urban population are much higher than that of India.

 

[INDIC]

How much is the % then?

The percentage haven't changed much when 1990 and 2010 are compared. 30% is like some miracle in the period of economic crisis.

 

[illusion8]

I will say that is a big improvement.

BTW,Our OP will conveniently ignore the fact that Pakistan's urban slum dwellers as a percentage of its Urban population are much higher than that of India.

China and India were almost neck and neck in 2007. India's has come down from 32% in 2007 to 17% presently that's a major improvement.

 

[KingMamba]

Slums may look small, but have highest population density.

Mumbai is destination for poor migrants form all over India, so not much of a surprise.

Yeah when you put it in that perspective it makes sense, mumbai is economic capital so all assume there will be jobs there. Same thing happens here in NYC, all the illegal aliens cross the border and come here to find work.

 

[Azazel]

China and India were almost neck and neck in 2007. India's has come down from 32% in 2007 to 17% presently that's a major improvement.

Huge slum redevelopment programs happened in the last decade,Besides another big factor might MNRGE Program.Rural employment programs might be slowing down rural migration to cities in search of work.

 

[narcon]

I will say that is a big improvement.

BTW,Our OP will conveniently ignore the fact that Pakistan's urban slum dwellers as a percentage of its Urban population are much higher than that of India.

Karachi's Orangi beats Slumdog Millionaire's Dharavi in Mumbai as Asia's largest slum - Telegraph

Mumbai's Dharavi, the squalid shanty town that provides the backdrop to the Oscar-winning film Slumdog Millionaire, has been displaced by Orangi in Karachi as Asia's largest slum, according to a new development report.

 

[illusion8]

@illusion8 not to be negative, but they may define it differently. India define's poverty at like 30-50 cents a day doesn't it?

We are talking of Urban poverty here - and there's nothing like 30 - 50 cents a day in cities.

Huge slum redevelopment programs happened in the last decade,Besides another big factor might MNRGE Program.Rural employment programs might be slowing down rural migration to cities in search of work.

On the contrary India will witness huge migration to urban cities by 2020 - 30, India is estimated to have close to 80% population living in Urban space. A lot of housing and infrastructure needs to be put up for this population.

 

[Shardul.....the lion]

Wow great,

It is reduced to 17% but it should come down to below 5%. This will happen only if rural India and BIMARU states will start to grow vigorously and reducing the burden on big cities.

 

[Ayush]

great news,let us hope this percentage decreases year by year.

 

[Azazel]

We are talking of Urban poverty here - and there's nothing like 30 - 50 cents a day in cities.



On the contrary India will witness huge migration to urban cities by 2020 - 30, India is estimated to have close to 80% population living in Urban space. A lot of housing and infrastructure needs to be put up for this population.

I am talking about present situation and a possible explanation for this surprising result.For that to achieve we will need a lot of cities.Those proposed Industrial corridors might be the answer.Slum redevelopment will happen automatically because of the soaring real estate prices.But of course all of this depends on economic growth.At current pace we wont achieve any of this.

 

[darkinsky]

I will say that is a big improvement.

BTW,Our OP will conveniently ignore the fact that Pakistan's urban slum dwellers as a percentage of its Urban population are much higher than that of India.

look at the picture, its india

btw i thought we were living in 2013 not 2007

 

[iam not greek]

look at the picture, its india

have some shame idiot

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

have some shame idiot

He probably is illiterate when it comes to statistics and data interpretation.

No point getting angry at illiterates.