16th December 1971: From East Pakistan to Bangladesh

[Homo Sapiens]

Only 17 Turkic horsemen took over Bengal just by riding through!!! The King simply fled away

This is a myth that only 17 horsemen took over Bengal. Bakhtiyar Khilji attacked with a large forces, but according to legend, he run horse so fast that only 18 horsemen could accompany him. But bulk of his force was just behind him. By that attack, he only took over a small portion of West Bengal in 1203 AD. He could not took all of Bengal. King Lakshman Sen continue to reign from his capital Bikrampur in East Bengal. Entire Bengal came under Muslim rules by 1230 AD on a gradual basis. Long after Bakhtiyar Khilji and Lakshman Sen's death.

• Only 200 British soldiers subdued 70K of Nawab’s army!!! Due to a conspiracy, they just looked on without putting a fight!

Another lie. Nawab's army was 50,000 strong. But bulk of it was under the command of Mir Jafar. British had 1600 European soldiers and 3000 Indian sepoy working for the British. Main army under Mir Jafar defected on the side of British as soon as war started. Conspirators also damaged cannon gun powder of Nawab's army. It was a sham war whose fate was sealed before it's start. Such small British forces could never dared to engage in war against Nawab if they could not managed Mir Jafar and other powerful conspirators.

The Burmese are now having a free ride inside BD of 160m folks!!! Their AF checked into them for 72 hours while entire BD military remained paralyzed!!!

They were not paralyzed, but were put on hold for strategic reasons. And AF is an exaggeration, a surveillance helicopter sneaked across boundary few hundred meters, when warned, fled to myanmar side rapidly. These incidence happened a number of times during the height of Rohingya crisis. Clearly a crude attempt by burmese to provoke Bangladesh into a clash and divert the attention from atrocities against refugees. Question is, why should we fall in such a crude burmese trap? We are not reactive animal dictated by raw impulse. These same burmese got tough response from Bangladesh army when they tried to infiltrate into disputed sea areas in 2008 and was forced to withdraw.

 

[bluesky]

President, PM pay tributes to martyred intellectuals
Published: December 14, 2018 10:08:01 | Updated: December 14, 2018 15:02:57

President Abdul Hamid and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina pay tributes to the martyred intellectuals on the occasion of the Martyred Intellectuals Day on Friday, December 14, 2018. Photo: PID

President Abdul Hamid and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Friday paid rich tributes to the martyred intellectuals on the occasion of the Martyred Intellectuals Day.

First the President and then the Prime Minister placed wreath at the Martyred Intellectuals Memorial at Mirpur in Dhaka city.

They stood there in solemn silence for a while as a mark of profound respect to the memories of the illustrious sons of the soil.

A smartly-turned out contingent of the Bangladesh Armed Forces gave a state salute, while the the last post was played on a bugle at that time.

The chiefs of the three services were present.

Flanked by the party’s central leaders, Sheikh Hasina, also the President of Bangladesh Awami League, laid another wreath at the Martyred Intellectuals Memorial as the party chief.

Road Transport and Bridges Minister and AL General Secretary Obaidul Quader, Liberation War Affairs Minister AKM Mozammel Huq and Mayor of Dhaka South City Corporation Mohammad Sayeed Khokon, amongst others, were present.

Later, the Prime Minister talked to the war-wounded freedom fighters and the family members of the martyred intellectuals and enquired about their wellbeing.

Sheikh Hasina then went to Dhanmondi in the capital and placed a wreath at the portrait of Father of Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in front of Bangabandhu Memorial Museum marking the Martyred Intellectuals Day.

After placing the wreath, she stood there for some time as a mark of profound respect to the memory of Bangabandhu, the architect of independence of Bangladesh.

Flanked by her party central leaders, Sheikh Hasina laid another wreath at the portrait of the Father of the Nation as the party chief, UNB reported.

On the night of December 14, 1971, over 200 intellectuals, including educationists, journalists, litterateurs, writers, physicians, scientists, lawyers, artists, philosophers and political thinkers, had been picked up in Dhaka by the Pakistani occupation forces, aided by their local collaborators.

The intellectuals were taken blindfold to torture cells in Mirpur, Mohammadpur, Nakhalpara, Rajarbagh and other locations in different parts of the city and later executed en masse at different killing grounds, most notably Rayerbazar and Mirpur.

Since then, the day has been being observed as the Martyred Intellectuals Day.

This is a myth that only 17 horsemen took over Bengal. Bakhtiyar Khilji attacked with a large forces, but according to legend, he run horse so fast that only 18 horsemen could accompany him. But bulk of his force was just behind him. By that attack, he only took over a small portion of West Bengal in 1203 AD. He could not took all of Bengal. King Lakshman Sen continue to reign from his capital Bikrampur in East Bengal. Entire Bengal came under Muslim rules by 1230 AD on a gradual basis. Long after Bakhtiyar Khilji and Lakshman Sen's death.

You are such an ignorant person on history that I feel you are still a kindergarten kid, stupid! Learn to become an adult and study thse histroriy books which have been written by the educated adults and not by the Banglapedia historians or @Top Cat.

At least you are better than @Billal. He wrote once that Bengali and Sanskrit are the twin sisters born out of the same mother. PDF has been infested with people with superficial knowledge. Very sad!! Stupid, was there such an entity (a Province or a country) called West Bengal at that time or even before 1947? It is a loose term. So, when you denote it with W, it becomes a separate entity.

Oh, I remember, you are that stupid who also wrote that the Bengalis were the older habitat in the CHT even before the Chakma or other Adibashis. You are such a shameless stupid, I just cannot believe the way you falsify history. Bloody m*nkey Awami League activist!!

 

[Buddhistforlife]

President, PM pay tributes to martyred intellectuals
Published: December 14, 2018 10:08:01 | Updated: December 14, 2018 15:02:57

President Abdul Hamid and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina pay tributes to the martyred intellectuals on the occasion of the Martyred Intellectuals Day on Friday, December 14, 2018. Photo: PID

President Abdul Hamid and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Friday paid rich tributes to the martyred intellectuals on the occasion of the Martyred Intellectuals Day.

First the President and then the Prime Minister placed wreath at the Martyred Intellectuals Memorial at Mirpur in Dhaka city.

They stood there in solemn silence for a while as a mark of profound respect to the memories of the illustrious sons of the soil.

A smartly-turned out contingent of the Bangladesh Armed Forces gave a state salute, while the the last post was played on a bugle at that time.

The chiefs of the three services were present.

Flanked by the party’s central leaders, Sheikh Hasina, also the President of Bangladesh Awami League, laid another wreath at the Martyred Intellectuals Memorial as the party chief.

Road Transport and Bridges Minister and AL General Secretary Obaidul Quader, Liberation War Affairs Minister AKM Mozammel Huq and Mayor of Dhaka South City Corporation Mohammad Sayeed Khokon, amongst others, were present.

Later, the Prime Minister talked to the war-wounded freedom fighters and the family members of the martyred intellectuals and enquired about their wellbeing.

Sheikh Hasina then went to Dhanmondi in the capital and placed a wreath at the portrait of Father of Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in front of Bangabandhu Memorial Museum marking the Martyred Intellectuals Day.

After placing the wreath, she stood there for some time as a mark of profound respect to the memory of Bangabandhu, the architect of independence of Bangladesh.

Flanked by her party central leaders, Sheikh Hasina laid another wreath at the portrait of the Father of the Nation as the party chief, UNB reported.

On the night of December 14, 1971, over 200 intellectuals, including educationists, journalists, litterateurs, writers, physicians, scientists, lawyers, artists, philosophers and political thinkers, had been picked up in Dhaka by the Pakistani occupation forces, aided by their local collaborators.

The intellectuals were taken blindfold to torture cells in Mirpur, Mohammadpur, Nakhalpara, Rajarbagh and other locations in different parts of the city and later executed en masse at different killing grounds, most notably Rayerbazar and Mirpur.

Since then, the day has been being observed as the Martyred Intellectuals Day.


You are such an ignorant person on history that I feel you are still a kindergarten kid, stupid! Learn to become an adult and study thse histroriy books which have been written by the educated adults and not by the Banglapedia historians or @Top Cat.

At least you are better than @Billal. He wrote once that Bengali and Sanskrit are the twin sisters born out of the same mother. PDF has been infested with people with superficial knowledge. Very sad!! Stupid, was there such an entity (a Province or a country) called West Bengal at that time or even before 1947? It is a loose term. So, when you denote it with W, it becomes a separate entity.

Oh, I remember, you are that stupid who also wrote that the Bengalis were the older habitat in the CHT even before the Chakma or other Adibashis. You are such a shameless stupid, I just cannot believe the way you falsify history. Bloody m*nkey Awami League activist!!

Yes the Chakma buddhists are the indigenious people in the Chittagong hill tracts. There were no Muslims in the hill tracts before 1975 however Ziaur Rahman brought millions of illegal muslims from other parts of Bangladesh in the hill tracts. The Chakma Buddhists consisted of 95% of the total population of the hill tracts in 1975 however now they are 60% in cht because the BD army and muslims grabbed their lands, torched their homes, forcefully made them flee their own country.

The tribal Buddhist population have no rights in Bangladesh and they are the most unpriviledged people. The tribals have no access to education, jobs and most of them are settled in the hills where they only can work in fields.

 

[El Sidd]

Rakhine State emerges

 

[Mage]

Yes the Chakma buddhists are the indigenious people in the Chittagong hill tracts. There were no Muslims in the hill tracts before 1975 however Ziaur Rahman brought millions of illegal muslims from other parts of Bangladesh in the hill tracts. The Chakma Buddhists consisted of 95% of the total population of the hill tracts in 1975 however now they are 60% in cht because the BD army and muslims grabbed their lands, torched their homes, forcefully made them flee their own country.

The tribal Buddhist population have no rights in Bangladesh and they are the most unpriviledged people. The tribals have no access to education, jobs and most of them are settled in the hills where they only can work in fields.

Nice fiction.

Tribals enjoy quota is govt service...Tribals also enter Bangladesh Military. Heck, govt now even have takes measures to give them education in their language....despite being less than 1% of the total population.

There have been some unrest in CHT before. But now things are fine. And will remain fine for the foreseeable future.

 

[bluesky]

Yes the Chakma buddhists are the indigenious people in the Chittagong hill tracts. There were no Muslims in the hill tracts before 1975 however Ziaur Rahman brought millions of illegal muslims from other parts of Bangladesh in the hill tracts. The Chakma Buddhists consisted of 95% of the total population of the hill tracts in 1975 however now they are 60% in cht because the BD army and muslims grabbed their lands, torched their homes, forcefully made them flee their own country.

The tribal Buddhist population have no rights in Bangladesh and they are the most unpriviledged people. The tribals have no access to education, jobs and most of them are settled in the hills where they only can work in fields.

Yes, you are completely correct. But, that idiotic traitor @Homo Sapiens from BAL claimed there were more Muslims in the CHT than the Paharias which I refuted off course. This @Homo Sapiens claim himself a great historian and someday he may claim he wrote Taz-ul-Nasiri, although at the moment he does not even know such a history book exists and talk about 17 horsemen who suddenly arrived in Bengal in 1203 from a 4000 km distant Afghanistan as if on a jet plane.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

This is a myth that only 17 horsemen took over Bengal. Bakhtiyar Khilji attacked with a large forces, but according to legend, he run horse so fast that only 18 horsemen could accompany him. But bulk of his force was just behind him. By that attack, he only took over a small portion of West Bengal in 1203 AD. He could not took all of Bengal. King Lakshman Sen continue to reign from his capital Bikrampur in East Bengal. Entire Bengal came under Muslim rules by 1230 AD on a gradual basis. Long after Bakhtiyar Khilji and Lakshman Sen's death.

Another lie. Nawab's army was 50,000 strong. But bulk of it was under the command of Mir Jafar. British had 1600 European soldiers and 3000 Indian sepoy working for the British. Main army under Mir Jafar defected on the side of British as soon as war started. Conspirators also damaged cannon gun powder of Nawab's army. It was a sham war whose fate was sealed before it's start. Such small British forces could never dared to engage in war against Nawab if they could not managed Mir Jafar and other powerful conspirators.

They were not paralyzed, but were put on hold for strategic reasons. And AF is an exaggeration, a surveillance helicopter sneaked across boundary few hundred meters, when warned, fled to myanmar side rapidly. These incidence happened a number of times during the height of Rohingya crisis. Clearly a crude attempt by burmese to provoke Bangladesh into a clash and divert the attention from atrocities against refugees. Question is, why should we fall in such a crude burmese trap? We are not reactive animal dictated by raw impulse. These same burmese got tough response from Bangladesh army when they tried to infiltrate into disputed sea areas in 2008 and was forced to withdraw.

You can find similar incidences in other Indian stories. I have read history of Babur and Hindu king Shahaji Bhosle and they are known for killing a tiger by bare hands. I really doubt these stories and their credibility.

This is a myth that only 17 horsemen took over Bengal. Bakhtiyar Khilji attacked with a large forces, but according to legend, he run horse so fast that only 18 horsemen could accompany him. But bulk of his force was just behind him. By that attack, he only took over a small portion of West Bengal in 1203 AD. He could not took all of Bengal. King Lakshman Sen continue to reign from his capital Bikrampur in East Bengal. Entire Bengal came under Muslim rules by 1230 AD on a gradual basis. Long after Bakhtiyar Khilji and Lakshman Sen's death.

Another lie. Nawab's army was 50,000 strong. But bulk of it was under the command of Mir Jafar. British had 1600 European soldiers and 3000 Indian sepoy working for the British. Main army under Mir Jafar defected on the side of British as soon as war started. Conspirators also damaged cannon gun powder of Nawab's army. It was a sham war whose fate was sealed before it's start. Such small British forces could never dared to engage in war against Nawab if they could not managed Mir Jafar and other powerful conspirators.

They were not paralyzed, but were put on hold for strategic reasons. And AF is an exaggeration, a surveillance helicopter sneaked across boundary few hundred meters, when warned, fled to myanmar side rapidly. These incidence happened a number of times during the height of Rohingya crisis. Clearly a crude attempt by burmese to provoke Bangladesh into a clash and divert the attention from atrocities against refugees. Question is, why should we fall in such a crude burmese trap? We are not reactive animal dictated by raw impulse. These same burmese got tough response from Bangladesh army when they tried to infiltrate into disputed sea areas in 2008 and was forced to withdraw.

Lol the burmese didnt lose but you got your *** saved by India and the West.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Yes the Chakma buddhists are the indigenious people in the Chittagong hill tracts. There were no Muslims in the hill tracts before 1975 however Ziaur Rahman brought millions of illegal muslims from other parts of Bangladesh in the hill tracts. The Chakma Buddhists consisted of 95% of the total population of the hill tracts in 1975 however now they are 60% in cht because the BD army and muslims grabbed their lands, torched their homes, forcefully made them flee their own country.

The tribal Buddhist population have no rights in Bangladesh and they are the most unpriviledged people. The tribals have no access to education, jobs and most of them are settled in the hills where they only can work in fields.

First of all, CHT is part of Bangladesh like any other part. So a Bangladeshi moving from other district to CHT can never become illegal.

Chakmas are the minority among the tribal population in CHT. Albeit the largest group. So it is a pure lie to claim Chakma are 95 percent of tribal population.

All the tribals in CHT constitute 50 percent of CHT population. So there is no way Chakma's are 60 percent of population.

Before Ziaur Rahman's resettlement program, Bengalis were 28 percent of CHT population. You should check credible statistics before claiming' there was no muslim before 1975'. CHT was lightly populated, so President Zia resettle some land less people from other districts. There were also strategic reason. To increase loyal population in the border areas of CHT. Because you tribals then started armed rebellion against Bangladesh with the help of Indian RAW. So Ziaur Rahman did what any patriotic Bangladesh president would have done. You tribals still have plenty of place to settle down in CHT and you are welcome to reside any part of Bangladesh besides CHT. No part of Bangladesh should be exclusively reserved for any group of people. Plain and simple. You only have legitimate grievance only if any tribal forcefully evicted by Bengali people in CHT. In that incidences, it should be solved case by case basis.

Another bullshit is that tribal people have no rights in BD. You tribals are just 1% of BD population, enjoying 5% quota in govt. jobs. Have special reservation in administration in CHT. Enjoying over representation in many important posts and businesses in BD. It is actually Bengali people in CHT who are discriminated, poorer than Chakma, less educated. You Chakma can start business in CHT without paying govt. any tax but not the Bengali residing there. There are many such privilege you are enjoying. Compare this with the situation of Rohingyas. You Chakma people came to CHT in same time period when Rohingyas started living in Arakan. But see the contrast. You should be thankful living in Bangladesh.

 

[Hasan89]

Says the forum weirdo that hangs around BD forum 24/7.

LOL that pwneds the inferior Tamil who licks Bangladeshis *** for attention all day on bd section. I bet other Indians here cringe over Nilgiri and feel ashamed he is such a low life who spends all his time and days on BD section on this forum licking their *** like a kutta from Kalkutta

 

[Destranator]

LOL that pwneds the inferior Tamil who licks Bangladeshis *** for attention all day on bd section. I bet other Indians here cringe over Nilgiri and feel ashamed he is such a low life who spends all his time and days on BD section on this forum licking their *** like a kutta from Kalkutta

Dude the moment you get racial you lose your high ground. Your comments are extremely distasteful and unwarranted.

 

[Nilgiri]

Dude the moment you get racial you lose your high ground. Your comments are extremely distasteful and unwarranted.

Its ok, he is perma banned now. Problem solved for time being.

 

[Mage]

Rakhine State emerges

In Baluchistan

You should watch it too, Rakhine Baluch @DESERT FIGHTER
Your dream cumming true.

 

[El Sidd]

In Baluchistan

You should watch it too, Rakhine Baluch @DESERT FIGHTER
Your dream cumming true.

Let anyone try i say

 

[Mage]

That the best you got? Maggot faggot.

Can't reply so switch to personal attack....

You know deep down you want Rakhine state in Baluchistan as well.

Let anyone try i say

This guy is your pm, el.

 

[El Sidd]

This guy is your pm, el.

He can try too