What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

. .
Sorry I don't understand at all why one side cannot be outclassed in hand to hand combat by another. Watch some of the old hooligan wars between football fans, particularly English vs Russians in France 10 yrs back. The English got trounced and the Russians dominated them with minimal cuts and scratches to their own. You don't understand how large scale brawls often pan out - it's hardly ever some "balanced fight". Mostly, a big brawl ends in one side completely dominating and claiming the battlefield. This isn't Bollywood where the director makes it look even for cinematic impact.
it were no hand to hand brawl but a bharati raid to capture territory to strengthen their hand in negotiations
 
. .
There is very little chance a war in Pakistan's vicinity involving any of India/Pakistan/China is going to make to strategic gains. I fear, destruction for all if things go out of hand--and they can. However, Modi changed the decades long status quo where there was relative peace, by grabbing all of Indian Occupied Kashmir as Union Territory. In my mind, it was done, at the behest of West, to contain China. But Modi was blinded by the super-hot coddling of Indian leaders since Bill Clinton in 2000 and by the 'Howdy Modi' rallies etc etc. Idiot should know that the West has no real love for 'Indian democracy' or for Indians themselves.

Under Modi, India fairly directly challenged China's dominance: CPEC was/is China's strategic project and China wouldn't just quietly if India threatened the project. So however you slice and dice it, it is obvious that China is quite willing to escalate to protect it's strategic project. Modi overplayed his cards. Indian planners should have foreseen that China wouldn't accept a change of status quote around Aksai Chin and the land link to Pakistan.
 
.
:pop: :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop: .... come on China, come on China, I want some more action! :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop:
 
.
US News confirms that American Intelligence believes that over 35 Chinese soldiers died in the face off

Dozens killed as India China face in first deadly clash in decades

Dozens of troops from India and China were reportedly killed in a dispute along a contested area of their shared border – the first bloody clash between the two countries in decades and an event with the potential to spark even more violence.

Chinese state media described the incident Monday night in the Galwan River valley where both countries have deployed troops in recent weeks as "the most serious clash between Chinese and Indian soldiers so far," confirming casualties but offering no further details about them. Indian government sources speaking on the condition of anonymity told The Times of India that 20 Indian army personnel had died in the fighting.

American intelligence believes 35 Chinese troops died, including one senior officer, a source familiar with that assessment tells U.S. News. The incident took place during a meeting in the mountainous region between the two sides – both of which had agreed to disarm – to determine how the two militaries would safely withdraw their presences from the region.

The meeting grew tense and resulted in a physical confrontation between the troops. According to the assessment, all of the casualties were from the use of batons and knives and from falls from the steep topography, the source says.

According to the U.S. assessment, the Chinese government considers the casualties among their troops as a humiliation for its armed forces and has not confirmed the numbers for fear of emboldening other adversaries, the source says.

The sources who spoke with the Times said 43 Chinese troops died in the fighting.
 
. .
it were no hand to hand brawl but a bharati raid to capture territory to strengthen their hand in negotiations
Of course it is obvious that it was a proper military engagement and bullets were flying. I'm merely entertaining this bizarre hypothesis that it was a massive pub brawl - even in that ridiculous scenario, it is entirely reasonable and probable for one side to outclass the other decisively.
 
.
Why, you indians don't trust your own sources?

Our sources believe that 43 Chinese soldiers died based on intercepted comms. American intelligence reports 35 Chinese deaths. Number must be between those 2 figures.

No wonder the Chinese don't want to officially state what their casualty figures are.
 
.
.
Our sources believe that 43 Chinese soldiers died based on intercepted comms. American intelligence reports 35 Chinese deaths. Number must be between those 2 figures.

No wonder the Chinese don't want to officially state what their casualty figures are.

Our sauces are made of tomatoes and they have more accurate information regarding this then Indian sources
 
.
6f6e9153-72e8-42de-b050-5f182db1fa1a.png


Chinese intercepts.. :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
Thats because he was rescued the next moment and fallowed by this action lol

EZWLTGJU0AE2k7O






Is a thief going to announce he robed 100 million from a bank? No right? China is quite because they killed many many many Indian soldiers and are the aggressors and right so. :enjoy:

None sense, this pic is from more than a week earlier, than that video. During initial days of Chinese incursion an Indian routine patrol party was surrounded, beaten and captured by Chinese soldiers(it was all over Indian news back then). It was after this incident, Indian started heavy deployment on the LAC.

Chinese just released this pic, when the video was leaked from Indian side..too fool people like you.
 
. .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom