What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

Our sources believe that 43 Chinese soldiers died based on intercepted comms. American intelligence reports 35 Chinese deaths. Number must be between those 2 figures.

No wonder the Chinese don't want to officially state what their casualty figures are.
Just take a deep breath. Stop hyperventilating and wait for official announcements. China is not measuring penises with you curry munchers. China will calmly announce any casualties and you can tick off your scorecard at that point.

Meanwhile, if China has lost a hundred men - for argument's sake - but still holds the battlefield, who actually won the encounter in your informed opinion? Who has gained an advantage in Ladakh after this is episode? This is basically Kargil but this time, your enemy will use its air force and artillery instead of machine guns if you decide to send a horde of Sikhs up the ridge.
 
.
Our sources believe that 43 Chinese soldiers died based on intercepted comms. American intelligence reports 35 Chinese deaths. Number must be between those 2 figures.

No wonder the Chinese don't want to officially state what their casualty figures are.

Credible News media around the World have confirm the same story, 20 Indian soldiers dead:

Reuters- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...r-with-casualties-on-both-sides-idUSKBN23N0ZU
AP News-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://apnews.com/4229f3e3e36a56e7487dc35f58d99105
Forbes-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladi...order-clash-with-chinese-forces/#21af4b8369b4
NPR News-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/16/8777...ter-clashes-with-chinese-soldiers-near-border
The New York Times- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/world/asia/indian-china-border-clash.html
CNN- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/asia/china-india-border-clash-intl-hnk/index.html
Wall Street Journal-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-china-border-dispute-turns-deadly-11592305962
Los Angeles Times- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
hthttps://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/...6/21293158/india-china-border-fight-dead-army
ABC News- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-16/indian-troops-killed-in-border-face-off-with-china/12362112
Sky News- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://news.sky.com/story/20-indian-soldiers-killed-in-border-clashes-with-china-says-army-12008124
Al Jazeera- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...illed-border-clash-china-200616172525853.html
 
.
Looks like isolation of Pakistan and containment of China policy didn't work out.

Bharat ended up isolated and contained herself like a dehati aurat.

China on LAC, Talibs in Afghanistan , now even Nepal is showing its teeth.
 
.
Sorry I don't understand at all why one side cannot be outclassed in hand to hand combat by another. Watch some of the old hooligan wars between football fans, particularly English vs Russians in France 10 yrs back. The English got trounced and the Russians dominated them with minimal cuts and scratches to their own. You don't understand how large scale brawls often pan out - it's hardly ever some "balanced fight". Mostly, a big brawl ends in one side completely dominating and claiming the battlefield. This isn't Bollywood where the director makes it look even for cinematic impact.

And you won't understand, few cheerleaders ever do.
 
. .
India-China clash: 20 Indian troops killed in Ladakh fighting

At least 20 Indian soldiers were killed in a clash with Chinese forces in a disputed Himalayan border area, Indian officials say.

The incident follows rising tensions, and is the first deadly clash in the border area in at least 45 years.

The Indian army initially said three of its soldiers had been killed, adding that both sides suffered casualties.

But later on Tuesday, officials said a number of critically injured soldiers had died of their wounds.

India's external affairs ministry accused China of breaking an agreement struck the previous week to respect the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the Galwan Valley.

BBC diplomatic correspondent James Robbins says violence between two armies high up in the Himalayas is very serious, and pressure will grow on the two nuclear powers not to allow a slide into full-scale conflict.

What have both sides said about the incident?
Early on Tuesday the Indian army said three of its soldiers, including an officer, had died in a clash in Ladakh, in the disputed Kashmir region.

Later in the day, it released a statement saying the two sides had disengaged.

It added that "17 Indian troops who were critically injured in the line of duty" and died from their injuries, taking the "total that were killed in action to 20".

China did not confirm any casualties, but accused India in turn of crossing the border onto the Chinese side.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said India had crossed the border twice on Monday, "provoking and attacking Chinese personnel, resulting in serious physical confrontation between border forces on the two sides", AFP news agency reported.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-53061476
 
.
US News confirms that American Intelligence believes that over 35 Chinese soldiers died in the face off

Dozens killed as India China face in first deadly clash in decades
American intelligence? Im more than willing to bet that this came from an Indian source and the author disguised it as an American one to sound more credible. If you read further, youll see the author belives the Chinese were "humiliated" ... if this isnt what an Indian person wants to think what happened to the Chinese then what is?
 
.
So tell us, how many casualties and injuries, did you suffer ?

You will have nothing, because your government does not believe, you are worthy of any information. You are just mindless bots for them.
you will probably see it if you guys pushed more like last time, hyping on a leaked video beating a lisiaon man and get what you deserved later.:wave:
 
.
Credible News media around the World have confirm the same story, 20 Indian soldiers dead:
Reuters- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...r-with-casualties-on-both-sides-idUSKBN23N0ZU
AP News-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://apnews.com/4229f3e3e36a56e7487dc35f58d99105
Forbes-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladi...order-clash-with-chinese-forces/#21af4b8369b4
NPR News-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/16/8777...ter-clashes-with-chinese-soldiers-near-border
The New York Times- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/world/asia/indian-china-border-clash.html
CNN- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/asia/china-india-border-clash-intl-hnk/index.html
Wall Street Journal-say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-china-border-dispute-turns-deadly-11592305962
Los Angeles Times- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
hthttps://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-06-16/three-indian-soldiers-killed-clash-chinese-troopstps://www.vox.com/2020/6/16/21293158/india-china-border-fight-dead-army
ABC News- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-16/indian-troops-killed-in-border-face-off-with-china/12362112
Sky News- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://news.sky.com/story/20-indian-soldiers-killed-in-border-clashes-with-china-says-army-12008124
Al Jazeera- say 20 Indian soldiers dead clash with Chinese Troops
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...illed-border-clash-china-200616172525853.html

Lol what are you rambling about.

Indian army is openly accepting that they lost 20 Indian troops(that is why all these media outlets are reporting it) and at same time also claiming, they inflicted "significant" casualties on PLA.

It is only PLA, which is not able to come to terms with casualties and accept it.
 
.
And you won't understand, few cheerleaders ever do.

Nobody here is "cheerleading" your country is facing Pakistan directly on LoC. What part of a territory dispute do you not understand?
 
.
ABC News reporting at least 20 Indians have been killed in conflict with China, and unconfirmed reports of multiple Chinese casualties.

20200617_101939.jpg
 
.
Till a few hours indians claimed 5 now they are claiming 43. :lol:

While om the indian side over 20 are confirmed dead and dozens missing (probably in chinese custody).

Thanks bro, I think the Indian claim is just twitter statement, so far Indian government only said they got 20 soldiers death. Not mentioning about Chinese casualties. It is what is said by Aljazera news just now.
 
.
Lol what are you rambling about.

Indian army is openly accepting that they lost 20 Indian troops(that is why all these media outlets are reporting it) and at same time also claiming, they inflicted "significant" casualties on PLA.

It is only PLA, which is not able to come to terms with casualties and accept it.
If you take your time to read them all, there is no report of 43 Chinese soldiers dead as you Indians claim
 
. .
you will probably see it if you guys pushed more like last time, hyping on a leaked video beating a lisiaon man and get what you deserved later.:wave:

Bull$hit.. he was being protected, had a riot shield covering - Indian officer re -assuring him that he is alright. And that pic you leaked was from weeks earlier, where you ambushed an Indian patrol and captured them. One of the reason, this conflict started in the first place.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom