Recent content by ashley.1965

This is a defence forum. If you wish to engage in a debate on the existence and uniqueness of God, go elsewhere. Sure - and your behavior on this thread provides ample evidence of the veracity of that statement.

No need - it is sufficient to know that you will find yourself in the court of God on Judgement Day. What does it matter? 72 or otherwise, on your present trajectory, you ain't even getting one.

Feigned ignorance is not a good strategy for agitprop if the remainder of your statements end up merely unmasking your agenda. Any lawyer worth his/her salt would have taken you to the cleaners had you attempted the following in a court of law: In summary, you have attempted the following...

They are not promoting him. They are concurrently doing the following: 1. Gauging online opinion to ascertain whether or not his views hold sway amongst Pakistanis; 2. Engaging in confirmation bias to reassure themselves that the acceptability ratio of his views is in outlier territory, and...

You are fortuitously correct. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) does not deal with bringing rights abusers to (Western) justice. That is the job of the ICC (International Criminal Court). Here are the differences between the two: Jurisdiction: The ICC has jurisdiction over individuals...

And a westernized racist/supremacist attitude towards the Muslims of Afghanistan does? The beard that you castigate against is a confirmed sunnah of the Prophet ﷺ. The authenticity of the hadith about China is at best debatable. It has multiple chains of narration, which potentially gives it...

The perp, one can be sure, is perfectly capable of responding and did not require your intervention. The rest of your post is a haphazard set of disjointed statements not worthy of a rational response.

Don't know if you are a Muslim or not, but that attitude is contrary to injunctions about "الأمر بالمَعْرُوف والنَهي عن المُنْكَر" (enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong) as mentioned in the Qur'an [3:104; 3:110; 5:105; 9:112; 9:71]. It is also in contradiction to the following...

Welcome home, Madam. With respect from :pakistan:

Not according to what is what is being reported by the UK's Guardian newspaper, see here: "Under the deal, Meng’s prosecution will be deferred until December next year and will be dropped entirely if she complies with her obligations. One of those obligations was not to contradict a statement...

Actually, you are VERY wrong. Go through the archives of Feb 2018 on this forum to understand what happened. The following summarized sequence of events are from those archives, as well as news published in Dawn, here: 1. There was a plenary session of FATF on 20 Feb 18 that did not mention...

The book is available online for download on one of the Far East book repositories. (If you know where to look ...) The ISI quote is at the end of Chapter 7.

That would put the collapse date at 14 Sep 2001. A veritable treasure trove of media has been archived from that era. Care to back that claim up with some solid evidence?

No, let us not agree to any such rule that would be in direct contravention to the "duty of care" requirement that the Hippocratic Oath obliges doctors to adhere to. The demand for such a rule is being pushed by sold-out western politicians and is of course being cheer-led by an army of...

What is the source of this rumour? As of now, this is certainly not the case. You can see the latest travel advisory at the following link, by clicking on "Travelling to Pakistan": https://www.piac.com.pk/travel-advisory-updates Why are you spreading lies on this forum? For travel from...