ISIS Threatens Iran for Tolerating Jews

[Tokhme khar]

End times?.......lol.........we have an apocalyptic here folks.

You need counseling by hillbilly or Israeli's bro.....you are losing your wahabbi focus. Please contact the nearest CIA affiliate close to your home. They will fix this problem quick.

We Live in End times and Allah want to Save as Many Humans on the Planet by Opening their Hearts and Mind, Shia religion is NOT Islam also Wahabi Salafi are Pawns so Muslims are Paying the Price through their Blood of Shia Majoosi and Salafi Stupidity and Foolishness

 

[salarsikander]

from miscreant Muslims

ISIS is not muslim.

And they will never threaten Zionists in Israel.
God bless the real jews in Iran who are not moving up to fake state of zionists

 

[Tokhme khar]

It's 'End Times' for you soon. With this jew-billy apocalyptic dribble of yours, you will be missed by the Zionists.

Are You High ? What You smoke Hookah or Hash or You inject yourselves with Opium!



I hope You Do not look like your Profile Picture........as if You look like your Profile Picture then I am Sorry on Your State of MIND

 

[Taimoor Khan]

When these ISIS lot have actually threaten, let alone done anything against Israel, which is........ A Jewish state!!

 

[Cthulhu]

نه برادر من . دلیت میشه

بخشی روی شبکه دروغ گوی سلطنتی انگلیس هست
http://www.bbc.com/persian/iran-39425528

این بی بی سی ای ها خیلی بی شرفن، به نحوه ای که این خبره رو می خونه توجه کنید. اولا که داره تو ویدئو می گه هدف داعش انتقاد از حکومت ایرانه و داره اینا به جای مخالف های حکومت قابل می کنه به مردم (سیاست اینا اینه که همیشه حکومت ایران و مردم رو دو تا چیز متفاوت نشون بدن) حالا هم این داعشی ها رو گذاشتن تو لیست مخالفای حکومت تا کسایی که ممکنه با این ویدئو تحت تاثیر قرار بگیرن تو ذهن خودشون کارهاشون رو مخالفت با حکومت ایران ببینن
آخرش هم می گه که با این ویدئو دستگاه های امنیتی ایران اهل سنت رو تحت فشار قرار می دن و می خواد به مخاطب های خودش القاء کنه که قراره این ویدئو بهانه ای بشه برای سرکوب شما پس باید همین الان شروع کنید به مقاومت

 

[Solomon2]

ISIS is not muslim.

No one disputes that ISIS self-identifies as Muslim.

And they will never threaten Zionists in Israel.

Since that's already happened, it means you've entered full denial mode.

God bless the real jews -

You have been told this before: contrary to all you've been taught in Pakistan, Jews are a people for whom Judaism is their religion and thus identification as Jew is not a matter of other people's designations or religious observance, but descent and conversion (which for Jews is a process akin to adoption.)

That you maintain this line DESPITE knowing better pegs you as an unrepentant lying propagandist, is that not so?

 

[pak-marine]

LOL! Why dont these ISIS mental midget psychopaths threaten Israel? .

Got to give credit where due isis know Israel will finish these isis scums they are no iraq or iran ! Israel have the most amount of experience fighting on multiple fronts incl gurella warfare .. isis simply cannot enter Israel what the world is facing now israel have been fighting this since decades so vast experience .. very hard for miltants to penetrate into Israel

 

[salarsikander]

No one disputes that ISIS self-identifies as Muslim.

Since that's already happened, it means you've entered full denial mode.

You have been told this before: contrary to all you've been taught in Pakistan, Jews are a people for whom Judaism is their religion and thus identification as Jew is not a matter of other people's designations or religious observance, but descent and conversion (which for Jews is a process akin to adoption.)

That you maintain this line DESPITE knowing better pegs you as an unrepentant lying propagandist, is that not so?

But Zionism is alien to Judaism wouldn't you agree ?

Ofc you will conveniently agree that is Isis is Muslim. Its like saying Zionists representing Judaism, when in fact it differ s the very core belief of Jewish

No one disputes that ISIS self-identifies as Muslim

But Jewish and entire wold disputes that is real is an illegal and an occupied territory.
Not me but Jewish people themselves

whom Judaism is their re

I have been told my Jewish themselves that judasim has been hacked by Zionist. And zionism has caused more damage to Judaism than any non Jewish could ever BRing

 

[Solomon2]

But Zionism is alien to Judaism wouldn't you agree ?

The right of Jews to Palestine as their National Home can be fully established on secular grounds without bothering to answer this question.

But Jewish and entire wold disputes that is real is an illegal and an occupied territory.

So if a gang of thugs robbed you and claimed afterwards they had a legal right to your wallet because they were many and you were just one then you would have to agree, yes?

I have been told my Jewish themselves that judasim has been hacked -

There is great room for argument and dissent among Jews. Live and learn!

 

[salarsikander]

The right of Jews to Palestine as their National Home can be fully established on secular grounds without bothering to answer this question.

So if a gang of thugs robbed you and claimed afterwards they had a legal right to your wallet because they were many and you were just one then you would have to agree, yes?

There is great room for argument and dissent among Jews. Live and learn!

Secular grounds? Please share those grounds if you have any.
Because last I checked israel was created as a separate homeland for all the Jews, yet there are more Jews living outside of occupied territory than inside it, including you yourself,

Yes there are dissent that originated around 150 200 years ago in Judaism by the name of Zionist. That reject the basic commandments

if a gang of thugs robbed you and claimed afterwards they had a legal right to your wallet because they were many and you were just one then you would have to agree, yes?

Nope. Jews themselves reject the idea of homeland for jews, because they know, the can't have until the arrival of Messiah

 

[MultaniGuy]

ISIS Threatens Iran for Tolerating Jews
Rare Farsi Video Slams Iranian Govt for Offering Protection to Religious Minority
by Jason Ditz, March 27, 2017

ISIS has released a new propaganda video, this one unusually in Farsi language and directed specifically at Iran, threatening to destroy the current government of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and declaring Khamenei a “cursed person.”

The video singles out Iran for criticism because of its tolerance for its Jewish minority, saying that they are trying to “deceive the Sunnis” by presenting themselves as against the US and Israel while tolerating Iranian Jews living safely under government protection and having temples in Iranian cities.

Iran has had a Jewish minority living in its territory for some 3,000 years, and with estimates of as many as 25,000 Jews living there, is unique among Middle East nations in having such a community, with other nations in the region not tolerating their Jewish minorities after the establishment of Israel.

ISIS has been extremely hostile toward Iran since their founding, as a Sunni jihadist group that got its start attacking an Iranian-backed Shi’ite government in Iraq, and while it’s not surprising to see ISIS singling out Iran as an enemy, it is surprisingly to see the nature of their narrative.

Islam says to protect minorities. These isis are doing wrong.

 

[Solomon2]

Secular grounds? Please share those grounds if you have any.

The secular legal claim is through sovereign bequest and conquest of the territory during WWI. WWI saw the fall of three empires: Ottoman, Russian, German. Their territories were broken up into nation-states immediately or given Mandates to eventual self-rule or flat-out awarded to victors to become part of their own national territory.

Jews, very specifically, were granted exclusive political rights within the Palestine Mandate. Arabs were granted political rights in the remaining non-Anatolian and non-Caucasian areas.

The condition of the Palestine Mandate were for Arabs and Jews to retain their civil and property rights throughout the ex-Ottoman area, regardless of where they lived. These civil and property rights were not those of sharia or democratic states, but those of the Ottoman Empire under its 19th-century tanzimat legal reforms or practice.

However, the British chopped away 70% of the Mandate as a present for their Arab puppet, which in a fair and just world would put both the Brits and the Arabs in the Jews debt. The Arabs blatantly failed to adhere to the Mandate, as beginning in 1920 and through successive decades they seized Jews' property and expelled them openly or drove them to exile by abuse and penury.

Whereas Israel remains 20%+ Arab, as the only Arabs dispossessed were those who sided with Israel's enemies, for the Jews of Israel did not give up their civil rights to peaceful existence with their neighbors and without fear of assault. The Arabs were quite aware that the Ottoman punishment for this was not only dispossession, but could extend to extermination of revolting communities as well. This last the Jews did NOT do, choosing to temper justice with mercy.

So not only is the secular legal case for Jews' political rights in Palestine is quite, quite sound; the moral case for Israel is far greater than that of her Arab neighbors.

Unless, of course, you stick to your beliefs that what is "moral" is a function of numbers and power, not conduct.

Islam says to protect minorities. These isis are doing wrong.

If people out there claim to be Muslim yet act the way you say a Muslim should not, then if you do not actively oppose them and work to remedy their injustice you are accepting them as a legitimate part of the Muslim community.

 

[MultaniGuy]

The secular legal claim is through sovereign bequest and conquest of the territory during WWI. WWI saw the fall of three empires: Ottoman, Russian, German. Their territories were broken up into nation-states immediately or given Mandates to eventual self-rule or flat-out awarded to victors to become part of their own national territory.

Jews, very specifically, were granted exclusive political rights within the Palestine Mandate. Arabs were granted political rights in the remaining non-Anatolian and non-Caucasian areas.

The condition of the Palestine Mandate were for Arabs and Jews to retain their civil and property rights throughout the ex-Ottoman area, regardless of where they lived. These civil and property rights were not those of sharia or democratic states, but those of the Ottoman Empire under its 19th-century tanzimat legal reforms or practice.

However, the British chopped away 70% of the Mandate as a present for their Arab puppet, which in a fair and just world would put both the Brits and the Arabs in the Jews debt. The Arabs blatantly failed to adhere to the Mandate, as beginning in 1920 and through successive decades they seized Jews' property and expelled them openly or drove them to exile by abuse and penury.

Whereas Israel remains 20%+ Arab, as the only Arabs dispossessed were those who sided with Israel's enemies, for the Jews of Israel did not give up their civil rights to peaceful existence with their neighbors and without fear of assault. The Arabs were quite aware that the Ottoman punishment for this was not only dispossession, but could extend to extermination of revolting communities as well. This last the Jews did NOT do, choosing to temper justice with mercy.

So not only is the secular legal case for Jews' political rights in Palestine is quite, quite sound; the moral case for Israel is far greater than that of her Arab neighbors.

Unless, of course, you stick to your beliefs that what is "moral" is a function of numbers and power, not conduct.

If people out there claim to be Muslim yet act the way you say a Muslim should not, then if you do not actively oppose them and work to remedy their injustice you are accepting them as a legitimate part of the Muslim community.

I oppose isis. My father told me they are acting unIslamically. I condemn isis. What more do you want? I cannot go to Iraq or Syria to talk to them.

 

[salarsikander]

The secular legal claim is through sovereign bequest and conquest of the territory during WWI. WWI saw the fall of three empires: Ottoman, Russian, German. Their territories were broken up into nation-states immediately or given Mandates to eventual self-rule or flat-out awarded to victors to become part of their own national territory.

Jews, very specifically, were granted exclusive political rights within the Palestine Mandate. Arabs were granted political rights in the remaining non-Anatolian and non-Caucasian areas.

The condition of the Palestine Mandate were for Arabs and Jews to retain their civil and property rights throughout the ex-Ottoman area, regardless of where they lived. These civil and property rights were not those of sharia or democratic states, but those of the Ottoman Empire under its 19th-century tanzimat legal reforms or practice.

However, the British chopped away 70% of the Mandate as a present for their Arab puppet, which in a fair and just world would put both the Brits and the Arabs in the Jews debt. The Arabs blatantly failed to adhere to the Mandate, as beginning in 1920 and through successive decades they seized Jews' property and expelled them openly or drove them to exile by abuse and penury.

Whereas Israel remains 20%+ Arab, as the only Arabs dispossessed were those who sided with Israel's enemies, for the Jews of Israel did not give up their civil rights to peaceful existence with their neighbors and without fear of assault. The Arabs were quite aware that the Ottoman punishment for this was not only dispossession, but could extend to extermination of revolting communities as well. This last the Jews did NOT do, choosing to temper justice with mercy.

So not only is the secular legal case for Jews' political rights in Palestine is quite, quite sound; the moral case for Israel is far greater than that of her Arab neighbors.

Unless, of course, you stick to your beliefs that what is "moral" is a function of numbers and power, not conduct.

First of all no outsider has right to give slice of anything. UK for that matter is more than welcome to give them place a sovereign state in their tiny land.

Secondly, the analogy that Zionist use is religious here, so your any claim of secular ground hold no water whatsoever. Those Jewish who live in Palestine were not part of Israel which was clearly forced upon them forcefully.

Thirdly, jews cannot have a seperate homeland until a Messiah come who will then give them the land for jews, no Jew is allowed to claim ownership of any land as for jews.

That is why is Israel will always be regarded as an occupied territory. Not only by global community but by real Torah jews themselves.

 

[Lotus_stalk]

Most of the ISIS fighter were Ex- ALQueda Fighters who massacred Shias in Iraq.
Moses, Jesus, David etc were also Jews, hating Zionist is understandable. But hating jews is just plain racism.