A compilation of "All" Pakistani nuclear capable missiles

[Safriz]

Compilation with some salient features.

https://twitter.com/x/status/825236602733608961

 

[Praise Kek]

Shaheen and Ababeel do not even have Canisters.
None of the ballistic missile have silo capability.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Shaheen and Ababeel do not even have Canisters.
None of the ballistic missile have silo capability.

They have got what is called TEL which none of Indian BMs got. TEL allow them to be on move and mobile on all sort of terrain which in essence is considered as land based second strike capability. Indian missiles on the other hand operate from static platforms and can be nurtralised in first strike. Things will change for India once they mate their missiles with Subs but till date this hasn't been the case.

 

[Praise Kek]

They have got what is called TEL which none of Indian BMs got. TEL allow them to be on move and mobile on all sort of terrain which in essence is considered as land based second strike capability. Indian missiles on the other hand operate from static platforms and can be nurtralised in first strike. Things will change for India once they mate their missiles with Subs but till date this hasn't been the case.

Fail.
All of our missiles are road and rail mobile.

Pakistani missile technology is so obsolete that they do not even have Canisters for ballistic missiles.

It is so obsolete that their Shaheen and Ababeel still have fins like 50s era scuds.

Pakistan cannot even build a 10km range SAM.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Fail.
All of our missiles are road and rail mobile.

Pakistani missile technology is so obsolete that they do not even have Canisters for ballistic missiles.

It is so obsolete that their Shaheen and Ababeel still have fins like 50s era scuds.

Pakistan cannot even build a 10km range SAM.

Really? Kindly linked me the Indian missile test from a TEL right in the middle of desert like below:

Do you even know what TEL is?

Incidentally the latest Chinese DF16 missile got "fins" as well for inflight maneuverability.

 

[hussain0216]

Shaheen and Ababeel do not even have Canisters.
None of the ballistic missile have silo capability.

Wonderful

You have nothing to worry about our SLCMs, our MIRV capable missiles, our land, air and sub launched nuclear capable missiles.
Our anti ship cruise missiles or our TWNs

You can use advanced vedic technology to stop them

 

[Taimoor Khan]

All Pakistani tests are conducted from a desert because their launch pad is in the middle of a desert

Do you know what TEL looks like? Not TATA truck trying to pull the missile on cart like a donkey.
For reference:

And no, not all from deserts like below:

Bottom line is, Pakistan can launch its nukes strikes from all sort of terrain which makes its BMs absolutely lethal making them immune for any preemptive first strike. Silos based missiles are always a liability specially when distance the missile has to cover is short like in Pakistan India scenario. A thermonuclear strike on sites of Indians silos can effectively put the base out of operation.

 

[Hassan Guy]

Indigenous R&D at work.

Great development over the years.

 

[P@nThEr]

They have got what is called TEL which none of Indian BMs got. TEL allow them to be on move and mobile on all sort of terrain which in essence is considered as land based second strike capability. Indian missiles on the other hand operate from static platforms and can be nurtralised in first strike. Things will change for India once they mate their missiles with Subs but till date this hasn't been the case.

Where did you get such info?
We use Tatra TELAR & rail mobile launchers..

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Where did you get such info?
We use Tatra TELAR & rail mobile launchers..

View attachment 375095

Read my post #12

 

[Safriz]

Yeah right. This is not really road mobile. More like highway or motorway mobile. This road train of a thing cannot go on small roads let alone off road.

I mean seriously look at the small 22 inch standard truck wheels and not much ground clearance and the turning circle this thing will need is enormous.

Not to mention the Volvo trucks pulling them.

On the other hand look at the Beauties carrying Pakistani missiles.
Specially built at special industrial unit as evident from this satellite picture.

36 inch Rim and great ground clearance . all wheel drive with half of the axles being steerable. On par with Russian or Chinese TELs. Truely all terrain capable not just Highway or Motorway capable like Indian TELs

 

[Praise Kek]

Right!

How old are you kid?

You are embarrassing yourself if you call TATA truck pulling cart like donkey as TEL. Take it off road and see how it falls over.

Maybe Pakistanis are stupid but Chinese and Russian have also placed their BMs on TELs. Watch below and understand the concept of TEL and why Pakistan missile force is so lethal.

Ballistic missiles are not tanks
They do not need off road capability.

Chinese TELs are no way representative of Pakistani missile technology.
Backwardness of Pakistani missile technology is evident by NO Canisterisation and No silo capability and No submarine launch capability.

 

[EndangeredSpecies]

Yeah right. This is not really road mobile. More like highway or motorway mobile. This road train of a thing cannot go on small roads let alone off road.

I mean seriously look at the small 22 inch standard truck wheels and not much ground clearance and the turning circle this thing will need is enormous.

Not to mention the Volvo trucks pulling them.

On the other hand look at the Beauties carrying Pakistani missiles.
Specially built at special industrial unit as evident from this satellite picture.

36 inch Rim and great ground clearance . all wheel drive with half of the axles being steerable. On par with Russian or Chinese TELs. Truely all terrain capable not just Highway or Motorway capable like Indian TELs

Indian missiles are both road and rail mobile. Cannot post link but DRDO site mentions that.

BTW, India has quite a huge rail network with a number of tunnels. Pretty easy to hide missile in there. Yet to see any rail mobile option from Pakistan. Rail mobile is better due to speed and ability to hide in a tunnel.

Oh btw, both rail and road mobile options have a Transporter Erector and Launcher (TEL). All three functions, so stop considering TEL to be a China-given boon which others do not have. Infact DRDO site from 2004 mentions it. So does BEML site.

Lastly, as far as US goes, they do not care for these poor-man's mobility option. They have huge submarine fleet with SLBM which provides the absolute invulnerability as far as second strike or heck first strike goes.

 

[WebMaster]

Remain on topic!

 

[Foxtrot Delta]

Our second strike missiles used to be in Arabian sea silos and buoys. Plus a few on saudi territory not sure , if we need them now, as we have got ababeel and ababeel 2 coming soon. Also babur-3 & that JL-2 variant that we never tested