What's new

'(lips)Kiss of love' protest outside RSS office in Delhi, 70 detained

Go and take some basic bio classes... THEN start talking as if you actually knew something
Fyi i took my biology lessons in college long time ago :p:.It you who is the moron here who doesnt even know biology and evolution.
you are simply beating around the bush without answering my question that itself tells that you have no answers to my questions but simply trying to dilly dally here.
 
I thought society has evolved beyond it!
Anyway, I am not calling the current Indian society damaged. I am just saying that people who think that the direction in which they think society should change is right, are wrong. There is no right or wrong direction for society to change.

If someone wants to legalize homosexuality, he is right from his point of view, and if someone wants to keep it illegal, he is right from his point of view.

My point of view - if an act involves two consenting adults and doesn't hurt others, it should not be suppressed by law. Ban nudity/porno in public. Restrict sensual activities in public, but their personal activities involving no one else should be beyond the scope of law.
Did you even read what was posted before,
all everyone said was do that smooching stunt etc. in your own home or your place, not in public.
 
If nature churns out such "abnormality" at regular interval, is it really "abnormal" ? or is it just a reflection of our prejudice that labels it "abnormal" ?

Gays may not be able to have children by sex like many other IMPOTENT and BARREN couples. But they can be sperm donners or surrogate mothers. In a scientifically advanced society they too can (if required) contribute to the genetic diversity.

But clearly one's contribution to society cannot merely be measured on that scale.

How is their existence any more dangerous to society than the existence of couples who refuse to have children or cannot have children ?
Men cannot fill the role of a mother and the role of a mother is very important in a childs development that is why hinduism stressed that mother is greater than god.
Man can utmost try to care about the adopted or surrogate child but cannot replace the mothers role which was evolutionary response of thousands of years.
Simply put men are not cut out for the mothers role.
 
Fyi i took my biology lessons in college long time ago :p:.It you who is the moron here who doesnt even know biology and evolution.
you are simply beating around the bush without answering my question that itself tells that you have no answers to my questions but simply trying to dilly dally here.

I showed and proved to you more than once that humans are part of the animal kingdom.
My earlier post: Now try to find your race......
"Multicellular eukaryotic organims - animals-mammals-primates-hominids-humans: Thats were we belong in. So yes, we are animals.... unless you consider yourself a fungi or plant. And we did not "evolve" from mammals... we are mammals because I guess that your mother breastfed you ?"
Now figure out in which group your race is located......
 
Indian police cannot tolerate Indians wearing other teams jerseys (like Pakistans), how can they tolerate kissing? No kissing for you Indians.
 
Fyi i took my biology lessons in college long time ago :p:.It you who is the moron here who doesnt even know biology and evolution.


Says the guy who said that HUMANS EVOLVED FROM MAMMALS. :lol:

Either you have no clue about the topic, or you dont get the actual meaning of what you are writing.
 
Says the guy who said that HUMANS EVOLVED FROM MAMMALS. :lol:

Either you have no clue about the topic, or you dont get the actual meaning of what you are writing.
If humans didnt evolve from bacteria>fish>reptile>mammals then what did they evolve from?
Apes,chimpanzees are part of mammals.

Are you even sane?
 
I showed and proved to you more than once that humans are part of the animal kingdom.
My earlier post: Now try to find your race......
"Multicellular eukaryotic organims - animals-mammals-primates-hominids-humans: Thats were we belong in. So yes, we are animals.... unless you consider yourself a fungi or plant. And we did not "evolve" from mammals... we are mammals because I guess that your mother breastfed you ?"
Now figure out in which group your race is located......
I was asking you the same question do you consider yourself an animal or human at present now?
What is the difference between other apes and you?If you consider yourself as part of mammals why are you not behaving like chimpanzees? running naked in wild and doing things?
Since chimpanzees and we have only 2% difference.
 
Oh yeah right, day exists with night, pleasure with pain, so we should put both the victims and the perpetrators in jail. We should treat everyone same. There are no culprits, no pepetrators, only victims. We are all victims of fate. What a view.

Let us say we are all made of matter and so there is no tree, no rocks, no rivers, no nothing. This world does not exist.

I made those analogies to show that not everything is desirable but never the less required. NOT to prove we should treat everyone the same. I think I was pretty clear about it since I stated it explicitly. So it was rather dishonest of you to demolish that strawman.

Are you are going to deliberately misinterpret what I say just to win a debate ?

We treat people as per Dharma, with righteousness. Homosexuals are not "victims" any more than Hetrosexuals are "victims" of fate. So STOP trying to make victims of them just because you can. (by the right of might/majority)
 
I made those analogies to show that not everything is desirable but never the less required. NOT to prove we should treat everyone the same. I think I was pretty clear about it since I stated it explicitly. So it was rather dishonest of you to demolish that strawman.

Are you are going to deliberately misinterpret what I say just to win a debate ?

We treat people as per Dharma, with righteousness. Homosexuals are not "victims" any more than Hetrosexuals are "victims" of fate. So STOP trying to make victims of them just because you can. (by the right of might/majority)

Now, you have been on a strawman demolishing spree. Anyway, it seems for a lot of people here the tail wagging the dog seems to be dharma rather than the dog wagging the tail.
 
My friend suffers from kelptomania and should not be discriminated against for his natural disposition. Any property law freaks can go back to living in jungles because India is becoming liberal and soon everyone can have everything that belongs to everyone else.

your friend can steal all he wants in his house. I got no problems with that. A gay dude does nothing to you. What's your problem? Hindu Taliban much?
 
Both a kleptomaniac friend as well as a gay dude can do what they want in their houses. I just do not want their actions legalized. Indian libtard much?

Better liberal than a Hindu Taliban. Any way people have problems even with homosexuals keeping to themselves. Abolish 377
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom