What's new

Ancient Man and His First Civilizations.Proving Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth and severe lie

Status
Not open for further replies.
The point of the entire discussion was that Aryan and Dravidian are language categories, not races.

And it took you 506 messages to find out.
I don't know about him .. but I have seen you Sire explaining this particular topic innumerable times.
Somewhere read on this thread you are publishing a book. Do let us know when it hits the store.
 
I'm judging him by what he wrote, not where he attended school. George W Bush attended Yale :cheesy:

It's Columbia university, not Colombia. There's no London university, it's University of London.
I'm smarter than you, that's for sure.

University of London is informally referred to as London University.


I'd definitely rate a former President of US more smarter than a random bot of an anonymous forum. And i'd any day take the word of a man much more learned .
 
University of London is informally referred to as London University.

I'd definitely rate a former President of US more smarter than a random bot of an anonymous forum. And i'd any day take the word of a man much more learned .

University of London is made up of several colleges, everyone in the academic circle refers to each college by its own name, e.g. London School of Economic or LSE. No one calls it University of London, much less London University. Your Wikipedia info doesn't cut it :rofl: And Columbia U is not Colombia, formal or informal.

You can take anyone's word for all I care, I'm still smarter, more learned, than you in this anonymous forum.
 
Last edited:
University of London is made up of several colleges, everyone in the academic circle refers to each college by its own name, e.g. London School of Economic or LSE. No one calls it University of London, much less London University. Your Wikipedia info doesn't cut it :rofl: And Columbia U is not Colombia, formal or informal.

You can take anyone's word for all I care, I'm still smarter, more learned, than you in this anonymous forum.

Dont try to act too smart high IQ bot when you aren't. When i said London University or for that matter University of London it refers to him being the alumnus of one of the colleges which constitute the University, just as a person studying in any of the colleges of Delhi University can say he/she studied in a particular college of DU or Delhi University itself as DU does not have its own campus but made up of several colleges.
 
Dont try to act too smart high IQ bot when you aren't. When i said London University or for that matter University of London it refers to him being the alumnus of one of the colleges which constitute the University, just as a person studying in any of the colleges of Delhi University can say he/she studied in a particular college of DU or Delhi University itself as DU does not have its own campus but made up of several colleges.

Every college within University of London runs its own admission, confer its own degree, they're like independent institution. The colleges within University of Delhi don't have such autonomy, they are part of the university. You're dumber than I thought :omghaha:

No one calls University of London as London University, just as Columbia U is not Colombia U.
 
Every college within University of London runs its own admission, confer its own degree, they're like independent institution. The colleges within University of Delhi don't have such autonomy, they are part of the university. You're dumber than I thought :omghaha:

No one calls University of London as London University, just as Columbia U is not Colombia U.

That does not change the fact that they're still part of the "University of London" chibot. I was giving an example of Delhi University to try to get into your thick head that students of DU can be reffered by their individual colleges or simply DU itself, nowhere was i making any comparison on the governance or system of administration of both universities .

Still harping on a spelling mistake to make youself feel better, pretty obvious for a low grade troll.

When i said London University it was pretty obvious what i was talking about , even Delhi university has the official name University of Delhi but it is informally called Delhi University, but i'm expecting too much from a programmed bot.
 
The point of the entire discussion was that Aryan and Dravidian are language categories, not races.

And it took you 506 messages to find out.



Not from Old Slavic, but from Indo-Iranian, a root language for both Sanskrit, through the intermediate Indo-Aryan, and Avestan, through the intermediate Iranian.


You would be infinitely better off reading and improving your knowledge than ticking off boxes.
Are you one of those Bengali intellectuals?
 
That does not change the fact that they're still part of the "University of London" chibot. I was giving an example of Delhi University to try to get into your thick head that students of DU can be reffered by their individual colleges or simply DU itself, nowhere was i making any comparison on the governance or system of administration of both universities .

Still harping on a spelling mistake to make youself feel better, pretty obvious for a low grade troll.

When i said London University it was pretty obvious what i was talking about , even Delhi university has the official name University of Delhi but it is informally called Delhi University, but i'm expecting too much from a programmed bot.

No, they are not part of, they are independent: The University of London is consists of 18 self governing Colleges and 10 smaller specialist research Institutes. In many ways the Colleges are considered universities in their own right; they set their own entrance criteria for their courses and they offer their own services to students."

Your analogy is an epic fail, LOL. You simply have no clue. That is why your equate University of London with London University in the first place, but they are not used interchangeably, formal or informal. :omghaha:

Info from Wiki isn't going to cut it, get a proper education.
 
Last edited:
No, they are not part of, they are independent: The University of London is consists of 18 self governing Colleges and 10 smaller specialist research Institutes. In many ways the Colleges are considered universities in their own right; they set their own entrance criteria for their courses and they offer their own services to students."

LOL, your analogy is an epic fail.

You simply didn't know the dif between Columbia and Colombia, hence, your error of equating University of London with London University, but they are not used interchangeably, formal or informal. :omghaha:

Info from wikipedia isn't going to cut it, go get a proper education.

Superior fool it was a spelling mistake on my part and i already acknowledged that.

The source from where you copy pasted the above stuff also states that " All students from all the Colleges and Institutes are also University of London students, making them part of a community of over 120,000 students and giving them access to many services in London." The lines you've posted say "The University of London is consists of 18 self governing Colleges" thats what i'm saying all along knucklehead, if one studies in any of these 18 colleges one is considered a student of University of London too. Is it too much to get numbskull . High IQ bot there's no difference when one says Delhi University or University of Delhi , same way one with an iota of grey matter knows that University of London is same as London University if one is not a pre-programmed bot.

Its futile debating a low quality bot BTW, you'll just go around in circles, afterall your paycheque at the end of the day depends on the number of posts .
 
Last edited:
Superior fool it was a spelling mistake on my part and i already acknowledged that.

The source from where you copy pasted the above stuff also states that " All students from all the Colleges and Institutes are also University of London students, making them part of a community of over 120,000 students and giving them access to many services in London." The lines you've posted say "The University of London is consists of 18 self governing Colleges" thats what i'm saying all along knucklehead, if one studies in any of these 18 colleges one is considered a student of University of London too. Is it too much to get numbskull . High IQ bot there's no difference when one says Delhi University or University of Delhi , same way one with an iota of grey matter knows that University of London is same as London University if one is not a pre-programmed bot.

It was not a spelling error, you simply didn't know Columbia U is not spelled Colombia. Just as you didn't know University of London is not called London University: the two names are not used interchangeable. If you had known, you wouldn't have come up with the dumb analogy with U of Delhi.

Even after your retarded analogy, you visited the website, yet you still failed to understand each college of University of London is self governing, runs its own admission, grants its own degree. If you are a student of LSE, your degree is from LSE, not UCL, even though you're still a student of University of London. Dumbo!

Don't get personal and retarded the same time, I can't be a programmed bot. I'm just smarter than you :laughcry:
 
Last edited:
It was not a spelling error, you simply didn't know the Columbia is not spelled Colombia. Just as you didn't know University of London is not London University: the two names are not used interchangeable. If you had known, you wouldn't have come up with the dumb analogy with U of Delhi.

Even after your retarded analogy, you visited the website, yet you still failed to understand each college of University of London is self governing, runs its own admission, grants its own degree. If you are a student of LSE, your degree is from LSE, not UCL, even though you are a student of University of London.

Don't get personal, I'm not a programmed bot. I'm just smarter than you :laughcry:

Oh cut the crap pathetic bot, i never said anything about granting degrees or autonomy , i only said if you are a student of LSE or UCL you'll also be considered a student of University of London as the official website of the University claims. I knew you were one low life moron who'll run around in circles to troll and you've started doing that.

University of London can very well be reffered to as London University informally just of U of Delhi is reffered as DU, you have no proof to back your claim, i can atleast post a wiki link :lol:. A normal human being with iota of brain will know which univeristy is being talked about when one says DU or London University, but ofcourse a bot's brain will get "error" message when keywords dont match to those programmed before.

Like i said i'm a human and humans are prone to making error, i'm not as smart as a bot :laugh:

No point engaging a bot, shoo off
 
Oh cut the crap pathetic bot, i never said anything about granting degrees , i only said if you are a student of LSE or UCL you'll also be considered a student of University of London as the official website of the University claims. I knew you were one low life moron who'll run around in circles to troll .

University of London can very well be reffered to as London University informally just of U of Delhi is reffered as DU, you have no proof to back your claim, i can atleast post a wiki link :lol:. A normal human being with iota of brain will know which univeristy is being talked about when one says DU or London University, but ofcourse a bot's brain will get "error" message when keywords dont match to those programmed before.

Like i said i'm a human and humans are prone to making error, i'm not as smart as a bot :laugh:

Now you're back peddling after I took you to school. If you knew anything about U of London, you would've known each school grant its own degree. But you didn't know this simple fact. This is proof that you knew nothing about U of London. Hence, your equating of U of London with London U.

And you even admitted you took it from Wiki, LOL! Is this not another proof that you truly knew nothing about U of London? :omghaha: Wiki is for the low IQ. Google "london university" see what you get. All you'll find is "U of London." Dumbo.

All humans make mistake, but some are just dumber. They even believe in programmed bot :omghaha:
 
Last edited:
Now you're back peddling after I took you to school. If you knew anything about U of London, you would've known each school grant its own degree. But you didn't know this simple fact. This is proof that you knew nothing about U of London. Hence, your equating of it with London U.

So now you admit you took your info from Wiki? LOL, Wiki is for the low IQ. You want proof? Google "london university" see what you get. All you'll find is "U of London." Dumbo.

All humans make mistake, but some are just dumber. They even believe in programmed bot :omghaha:

Are you really that dumb or simply trolling just because you have to? Quote the post dimwit where i said anything about granting degrees or autonomy and sh!t , it was all about "if you've studied in LSE,King's college,etc then you'll also be considered a student of University of London" is it so hard to get into your thick head moron?? serioulsy you're one obdurate troll.

I see the same result for London University which i get for Delhi University, both have a U of .. and both are informally called LU and DU, too much of a logic in that to get dumbo .

Talk about high IQ , when Stephen Hawkins was asked about his IQ he said "People who boast about their I.Q. are losers" , i can see one here :lol:
 
Are you really that dumb or simply trolling just because you have to? Quote the post dimwit where i said anything about granting degrees or autonomy and sh!t , it was all about "if you've studied in LSE,King's college,etc then you'll also be considered a student of University of London" is it so hard to get into your thick head moron?? serioulsy you're one obdurate troll.

I see the same result for London University which i get for Delhi University, both have a U of .. and both are informally called LU and DU, too much of a logic in that to get dumbo .

Talk about high IQ , when Stephen Hawkins was asked about his IQ he said "People who boast about their I.Q. are losers" , i can see one here :lol:

You're back pedaling so bad you can't even make a coherent argument. Granting degree is what I said, you knew nothing about it. You don't even know the schools that made up U of London are autonomous, even though student from any school is also a U of London student. You only found that out after visiting the website. This simply shows you knew nothing about U of London, which is why you use term London U. LOL, didn't realize you're shooting yourself on the foot, do you? :omghaha:

You're not only a dumbo but you're a stupid liar too. Search engines are the same, there is nothing that shows up "London university" that ties with U of London. Who are trying to fool?

(I'll let you in on this. U of London is also known as UOL, Wiki doesn't tell you that, just ask any student in the UK)

Stephen Hawkins is right abt IQ. I don't boast, I proof it by exposing yours :sarcastic:
 
Last edited:
I don't know about him .. but I have seen you Sire explaining this particular topic innumerable times.
Somewhere read on this thread you are publishing a book. Do let us know when it hits the store.

That book was to have been about some aspects of the Muslim role in the decision to partition the country. I had started with the premise that the right-wing nationalists of the Indian National Congress had allowed their Hindu majoritarian views to give the Hindu Mahasabha an increasingly important role. I had thought earlier that this had discouraged the Muslims leadership, both the feudal element and the educated Muslim, who then formed the All India Muslim League in 1906. The rest, as they say, is history.

On getting involved with the subject, one aspect that emerged very quickly was the extremely complex nature of the question. The British had assiduously promoted the Indian Muslim, perhaps in reaction to the self-creation of the Indian Hindu, towards the end of the 19th century. However, as in the case of the Indian Hindu, the Indian Muslim proved to be elusive. People in the aggregate simply refused to behave as their stereotypes required them to behave, with the exception of the very small numbers of the elite on either side. In effect, the behaviour of the elite was projected on the rest of the community, obscuring the huge differences between the elite and their resentful subalterns.

I am now exploring the fascinating history of the Muslim depressed classes, and their fairly widespread and little-understood stance in Indian politics in the years between 1900 and 1947. It would be premature to say any more, except to record my chagrin at finding that Gandhi and the INC were actually far more representative than I had thought.

As you will gather from this, it is still the data-gathering stage, and there are months to go before there is a book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom