Anurudhati Roy About Modi

[INDIC]

Proof is there in Bon and Tibetan buddhist books .

It refers to 800AD. Now come with proofs and then reply to me.

 

[Spring Onion]

@Hyperion ......
@ghilzai .....
@Spring Onion...

These are three pakistani pashtuns. I would like to see their opinions. Afghanis pashtuns do refer to pakistani punjabis as brahmins and indians ,but I haven't seen this with pakistani pashtuns.

forums are not a window to generalize or form an opinion about an entire nation or a community even.

The Afghanistani posters on different forums (majority farsiwans and some Pushtuns are those who are sitting abroad having an elite life style and who do not have balls to land in war torn country of their own). They are always on the look to vent their frustration on Pakistanis be we are Pukhtuns or Punjabis that doesn't matter.


As far as We Pakistanis are concerned we do not consider Punjabis as Indians but we do see many Hindu traditions adopted by them and we do point these out.

As far as Punjabi is concerned do you know that Christians in KPK speak thaith PUNJABI.

 

[Partharjun]

So, can lower percentage or higher percentage of ancestry make any ancestor lesser or greater.



I just looked into it, BTW show me the reference of Oddiyana from 600BC.

Its a bit like the Brown Bag society of Blacks in USA. They have a brown papar bag at the club gate. Blacks are compared with the brown tone and those with lighter skin are allowed entry.

Utter slavish mentality. But then Punjabis are running away from the Ghosts of past. they want to look westwards towards the Central Asia and middle east.

Actually its not really for the Indians. They want to prove to the Arabs that they too are high Muslims with Middle eastern ancestry.

I have worked with a few Pakistanis, and their complexes have to be seen to be believed.

 

[sovcomflot]

It refers to 800AD. Now come with proofs and then reply to me.

Proof is there in bon and buddhist books?Can you prove the hindu mythologies ?

forums are not a window to generalize or form an opinion about an entire nation or a community even.

The Afghanistani posters on different forums (majority farsiwans and some Pushtuns are those who are sitting abroad having an elite life style and who do not have balls to land in war torn country of their own). They are always on the look to vent their frustration on Pakistanis be we are Pukhtuns or Punjabis that doesn't matter.


As far as We Pakistanis are concerned we do not consider Punjabis as Indians but we do see many Hindu traditions adopted by them and we do point these out.

As far as Punjabi is concerned do you know that Christians in KPK speak thaith PUNJABI.

@INDIC ,what you have to say?

 

[INDIC]

Proof is there in bon and buddhist books?Can you prove the hindu mythologies ?
@INDIC ,what you have to say?

I had conversation with her many times, more than you so I have quite an idea which she thinks.

 

[sovcomflot]

I had conversation with her many times, more than you so I have quite an idea which she thinks.

But she says otherwise.Your idea and how she is saying is different.

In court of law ,testimony is needed.

As far as We Pakistanis are concerned we do not consider Punjabis as Indians but we do see many Hindu traditions adopted by them and we do point these out.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/genera...urudhati-roy-about-modi-21.html#ixzz2h1xasvX2

 

[INDIC]

Proof is there in bon and buddhist books?Can you prove the hindu mythologies ?

And I said they are from 800AD, Padmasambhava came in 8th Century AD. Reference of Gandhara is there in lots of Buddhist sources from 600BC, Persians called Gandhara as Gandara during same period, not just Hindu mythology.

But she says otherwise.Your idea and how she is saying is different.

In court of law ,testimony is needed.

I know her views more than you.

 

[sovcomflot]

And I said they are from 800AD, Padmasambhava came in 8th Century AD. Reference of Gandhara is there in lots of Buddhist sources from 600BC, Persians called Gandhara as Gandara during same period, not just Hindu mythology.



I know her views more than you.

So the persians called it gandara . Maybe the word was persian then.But buddhist call it oddiyana.

You know her views? Prove it.

 

[Partharjun]

So the persians called it gandara . Maybe the word was persian then.But buddhist call it oddiyana.

You know her views? Prove it.

Whats the point of this endless trolling?

What are you trying to get out of this?

 

[Sugarcane]

I believe its Mohenjodaro, btw I have seen your Punjabis who find difficulties in pronouncing Sindhi names.

Desi Professor of Ancient History - Abhi kal hi tu tumhari izzat hoi hai farangee kay haathoon

PS: That was Indian pronunciation just corrected another letter.

 

[Spring Onion]

Proof is there in bon and buddhist books?Can you prove the hindu mythologies ?

According Indians like him even Ashoka was a great HINDU King

NVM

@INDIC ,what you have to say?

He cant speak on my behalf or behalf of any Pakistani.

We Pakistani Pukhtuns do NOT consider Punjabi Pakistanis as Indians.

as a matter of fact our Pakistani Sikhs in KPK speak Pashto and are nearer to Pukhtuns here than Indian Punjabi or Indian Sikhs even.

Our KPK Christians speak Punjabi and are more nearer to Pakistani Punjabis than Indians.

OH I forgot to mention our KPK Hindus also speak Punjabi and even they are NOT closer to Indian identity or comparison even

 

[Kompromat]

@Aeronaut is another pashtun .Lets see what he says?

Are pakistani punjabis like Indians?

I don't have an ethnicity.

 

[phylumchordata]

This thread has gone to dogs , why are we discussing origins of Hinduism in Islam ? That's plain stupid guys.

 

[Partharjun]

This thread has gone to dogs , why are we discussing origins of Hinduism in Islam ? That's plain stupid guys.

We are discussing it because this is what Pakistani "historians" on PDF are going to "prove" next.

 

[INDIC]

So the persians called it gandara . Maybe the word was persian then.But buddhist call it oddiyana.

You know her views? Prove it.

So, you can't back it with proof.