What's new

Pakistan is a brother indeed

With regard to the those who cry about Turkish economy in trouble are wrong. Any disturbances are like a ship going up and down in the waves. The fundamental trajectory of Turkish economy is squarely headed toward a first world tiger. The basics are there. Educated, hard working, open minded, dynamic population and ideal geography betwixt Europe and Asia.


Once the AKP and Erdogan leaves power Turkey will shoot up once more I know that its our country that needs a lot of fixing
 
وعلیکم السلام۔ الحداللہ۔
How are you?

Converting churches is against the Quran. Even if Muslims purchase them. Sultan Mehmet Fatih and his Scholars for dinars were wrong on this matter. Attaturk was wrong when he made it a museum. And Erdogan is wrong for making it into a mosque again. Secondly the timing is curious. He has alienated a large part of the Orthodox Christian world from Muslims. When Imposter Israel goes to destroy the Masjid, Muslims will only hear ' How do you feel now?' or words to this effect. Fools are Muslims and Muslims are fools.

Please watch this video. It is by Sheikh Omar Baloch a student of the late Dr Israr Ahmed.
https://invidio.us/watch?v=uHwAulr_JzI

I hope brother, you are not into Imran Hosein and his lies.
 
I hope brother, you are not into Imran Hosein and his lies.
I consider Sheikh Imran to be one of the few scholars who is able to penetrate the reality of the world today. Of course he makes mistakes, after all he is human. There are certain views of his that I do not accept but that goes with any scholar. I would like someone to contradict his arguments using the Quran and the Ahadith. So far the only arguments that go against him that I am aware are historical ones.

One thing that I am convinced of, and I learned this from Sheikh Imran, is that the prophecy regarding the conquest of Constantinople by a noble leader and army is to occur AFTER Al Malhama. After. People can try to posit that some scholars take the opinion that it could also be interpreted to be before Al Malhama but this is an example of 'hermeneutical waterboarding'. It is so plain and clear that the Ottomans tried to portray themselves as those noble ones in the prophecy and disregarded the bit about it being AFTER Al Malhama. This was done to gain religious legitimacy in the eyes of the Muslims. Even their scholars did not correct them. But what could you have expected from 'court scholars'. This behaviour by many scholars was replicated in the continent of India in times bygone.
 
I consider Sheikh Imran to be one of the few scholars who is able to penetrate the reality of the world today. Of course he makes mistakes, after all he is human. There are certain views of his that I do not accept but that goes with any scholar. I would like someone to contradict his arguments using the Quran and the Ahadith. So far the only arguments that go against him that I am aware are historical ones.

One thing that I am convinced of, and I learned this from Sheikh Imran, is that the prophecy regarding the conquest of Constantinople by a noble leader and army is to occur AFTER Al Malhama. After. People can try to posit that some scholars take the opinion that it could also be interpreted to be before Al Malhama but this is an example of 'hermeneutical waterboarding'. It is so plain and clear that the Ottomans tried to portray themselves as those noble ones in the prophecy and disregarded the bit about it being AFTER Al Malhama. This was done to gain religious legitimacy in the eyes of the Muslims. Even their scholars did not correct them. But what could you have expected from 'court scholars'. This behaviour by many scholars was replicated in the continent of India in times bygone.

I will answer you in another thread as this is off topic.
 
I consider Sheikh Imran to be one of the few scholars who is able to penetrate the reality of the world today. Of course he makes mistakes, after all he is human. There are certain views of his that I do not accept but that goes with any scholar. I would like someone to contradict his arguments using the Quran and the Ahadith. So far the only arguments that go against him that I am aware are historical ones.

One thing that I am convinced of, and I learned this from Sheikh Imran, is that the prophecy regarding the conquest of Constantinople by a noble leader and army is to occur AFTER Al Malhama. After. People can try to posit that some scholars take the opinion that it could also be interpreted to be before Al Malhama but this is an example of 'hermeneutical waterboarding'. It is so plain and clear that the Ottomans tried to portray themselves as those noble ones in the prophecy and disregarded the bit about it being AFTER Al Malhama. This was done to gain religious legitimacy in the eyes of the Muslims. Even their scholars did not correct them. But what could you have expected from 'court scholars'. This behaviour by many scholars was replicated in the continent of India in times bygone.
Imran Hossein has lost it completely, make Duas for him.
 
I already do.
The Duas should be for him coming back to senses --- I mean ignoring every single atrocity of Russians just because he thinks that Russians are the ones with whom Muslims will make alliance, this is too much. + he also rejects Hadiths from Sahih Bukhari, who is he to reject Sahih Hadiths!
 
An apology in advance if this hurts anyone here but Greece is merely looking for a conflict to divert public attention from the failures at home. We have a same situation in neighborhood where a warmongering public failure leader is nothing but keep bragging about war with neighbors 24/7. Push come to shove; well if Greece has many to pitch them against Trukey and cause a conflict; there will be few knocking on the doors of Greece once again. Greece regime shall serve their public instead of igniting conflicts as such but apparently, she doesn't have any choice except to fulfill the inventor's wish. Seems like those parties that failed to contain Turkey by other means are now so much interested to ignite a conflict in the region and making final moves to seal the fate of M.E especially in their favour without any opposition to agenda.

Once, the conflict broadens following the ambition that once G.W Bush Jr. quoted as "Crusade"; there will no difference of boundaries like Turkey or Pakistan or any other Islamic Fighting Force to say the least. That will be the final beginning of the end.

I don't need to explain if someone asking for details.
Said Highness. :tdown:
 
Pakistanis don't have any awareness about this it seems.

They have a pattern of seeking to be a 'support state'. If you were here on PDF in 2013 you'd stumble on countless pro-KSA messages from Pakistanis. Today the shift is to Turkey.
 
Back
Top Bottom