What's new

"We will treat only Hindus, not Muslims"

It was always problematic. But my friend said one more thing which was that there is no business class in Sindh or even punjab much like we have. So the businessmen make good money and don't have to fight hard like in India. So ultimately, they chose money over security. It was all good until the kidnappings started and they started emigration to the western countries with the support of sindhi diaspora.

Now I know you or him are just making this up. Seriously, kidnapping?

Bangladesh was always going to happen. It was impossible for the 2 Pakistan's to be one country, Indra Gandhi did what anyone would have done.

We are a different culture and society. BD were heavily influenced by Tagore, who he himself was anti-Pakistan, and most of their intelligentsia were Hindu. Remember that East Bengal still had a very high Hindu population which was sympathetic to India.

Pakistan has gotten more Islamic and our identity has become more and more concrete with time, based primarily on our heritage (IVC, Gandhara, Iranics, Turks, etc.) We have drifted to West Asia and Central Asia.

Choudry Rahmat Ali did not include Bengal in his nomenclature for Pakistan for a reason.

In this case I view separation as a blessing for Pakistan. Now we are potentially discussing future merger with Afghans on people to people basis, it is an exciting time.


BD also has taken off in a big way, and we have nothing but prayers and well wishes for them. Afterall, they are our beloved Muslim brothers and sisters.
 
Well I've never been a civil servant. Feel free to continue with your ruminations of style and such however please note that I won't answer any other personal questions. No offence.

No more personal questions. It was irresistible curiousity that provoked that sally. Now I am under control once more.

To analyse it let's step back, i won't go in to historical context of things, what's your personal stance on kashmir. No beating around the bush, i know the princely states, i know the nitty gritties, i know the pacts that were signed and all the mumble jumble of historical contexts. So not that, but your personal stance.

It is to insist on the government of India that leaving aside questions of constitution for the moment, they should ensure the dignity and self-respect of every individual dwelling in the Vale, irrespective of his or her political affiliation. Everything else can come later.
 
Now I know you or him are just making this up. Seriously, kidnapping?



We are a different culture and society. BD were heavily influenced by Tagore, who he himself was anti-Pakistan, and most of their intelligentsia were Hindu. Remember that East Bengal still had a very high Hindu population which was sympathetic to India.

Pakistan has gotten more Islamic and our identity has become more and more concrete with time, based primarily on our heritage (IVC, Gandhara, Iranics, Turks, etc.) We have drifted to West Asia and Central Asia.

Choudry Rahmat Ali did not include Bengal in his nomenclature for Pakistan for a reason.

In this case I view separation as a blessing for Pakistan. Now we are potentially discussing future merger with Afghans on people to people basis, it is an exciting time.


BD also has taken off in a big way, and we have nothing but prayers and well wishes for them. Afterall, they are our beloved Muslim brothers and sisters.

Congratulations on your entry into Central Asia. Ch Rehmat Ali did try to include many other places in Pakistan which were even less likely than Bengal.
 
Now I know you or him are just making this up. Seriously, kidnapping?



We are a different culture and society. BD were heavily influenced by Tagore, who he himself was anti-Pakistan, and most of their intelligentsia were Hindu. Remember that East Bengal still had a very high Hindu population which was sympathetic to India.

Pakistan has gotten more Islamic and our identity has become more and more concrete with time, based primarily on our heritage (IVC, Gandhara, Iranics, Turks, etc.) We have drifted to West Asia and Central Asia.

Choudry Rahmat Ali did not include Bengal in his nomenclature for Pakistan for a reason.

In this case I view separation as a blessing for Pakistan. Now we are potentially discussing future merger with Afghans on people to people basis, it is an exciting time.


BD also has taken off in a big way, and we have nothing but prayers and well wishes for them. Afterall, they are our beloved Muslim brothers and sisters.

There are even Pakistani journalist tweeting about the kidnappings of hindu minor girls in sindh by Mian Mithoo. You are quite a master of propoganda like Syed T
You are man enough to admit it, that is good, not many can do that.

Much respect.
But Turkey was indeed a supporter of Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1945 when most concentration camps were active. That.proves my theory.
 
It is to insist on the government of India that leaving aside questions of constitution for the moment, they should ensure the dignity and self-respect of every individual dwelling in the Vale, irrespective of his or her political affiliation. Everything else can come later.

Which government? a foreign occupation?
 
No more personal questions. It was irresistible curiousity that provoked that sally. Now I am under control once more.



It is to insist on the government of India that leaving aside questions of constitution for the moment, they should ensure the dignity and self-respect of every individual dwelling in the Vale, irrespective of his or her political affiliation. Everything else can come later.

Leaving aside the question of the Constitution for the moment ...
 
Congratulations on your entry into Central Asia.

It is a historical relation of our civilization, we have always had more relation to our West and North than our East. The Rajastani desert between us was a natural barrier.

IVC was totally unique from that of the Ganges.

For more, visit my thread on the topic: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/hist...d-its-people-rarely-part-of-india-ivc.598015/

Ch Rehmat Ali did try to include many other places in Pakistan which were even less likely than Bengal.

Besides undivided Punjab, what is different?

00000068.png


At this solemn hour in the history of India, when British and Indian statesmen are laying the foundations of a Federal Constitution for that land, we address this appeal to you, in the name of our common heritage, on behalf of our thirty million Muslim brethren who live in PAKSTAN - by which we mean the five Northern units of India, Viz: Punjab, North-West Frontier Province (Afghan Province), Kashmir, Sind and Baluchistan.

Now or Never; Are We to Live or Perish Forever
 
Which government? a foreign occupation?

I already named the government of India, the central government. Some Pakistanis call it an occupying force. That is not relevant as far as the human rights and daily dignity of Kashmiris is concerned.
 
I already named the government of India, the central government. Some Pakistanis call it an occupying force. That is not relevant as far as the human rights and daily dignity of Kashmiris is concerned.

Human rights are taken, including the basic right of self determination. Do you support that right?
 
Human rights are taken from the basic right of self determination. Do you support that right?

Yes, but not the distortions that Pakistanis pleading a special case bring into it.

This is not the topic of the thread. If you wish to discuss it with me beyond this point, open a new thread.

You will always find someone weak-minded enough to exchange shrill and meaningless threats with you here itself, but I believe it belongs elsewhere.
 
If you are going to accuse Pakistan of kindnappings of Sindhi Hindus which happen rarely, and sometimes are simple cases of love marriages, then you have to answer for mob lynchings of Muslims in India.

Is there even any comparison?

You broke the rules. It's not personal.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom