What's new

Turkish Cypriot describes the slaughter of unarmed Greek Cypriots

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,469
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
Turkish Cypriot describes the slaughter of unarmed Greek Cypriots
23.05.2018 16:23 CyprusSigmaLive
Capturesdvcfvd.JPG

With full cynicity he describes the massacres of unarmed and unarmed people in 1974 by himself, until then a member of the TMT, a Turkish Cypriot 84 years old.

In an interview with a Turkish television network, the elderly man today reported his memories, giving creepy details of how he acted in 1974.

The story is published in the column of the Turkish Cypriot journalist Cener Leveden, in the newspaper "Afrika", and relayed in Greek the site tourkikanea.gr.

According to the website, in 1974, the 84-year-old was an officer in the Messaria region and, as he boasted, he "arranged" the captured "giaureans" (as reported to the Greeks) who brought them there.
15b056ecd663bc.JPG


The interviewer, surprised at the interviewe[e], asks: "When you killed unarmed, defenseless, innocent people, how did you do that by seeing them in the eyes?" But the 84-year-old did not show any repentance.

As he spoke about Greek Cypriots, "And they did a lot".

"Even if they were innocent, where would I find those who did it? Killing me was my art. When the army came to our village, I joined them as the nose of Karpasia. I was very happy. As I approached the nose, I saw that there were many Greek Cypriot prisoners sitting there. My intention was to clear them all. Some who understood this, informed their officer. The Turkish officer, Khaki Boratas, told me that if I was away from him, he would shoot me.

"I necessarily stayed next to him. I was whipping away, "he said in words, not of repentance, but of pride.

For his part, Senor Lewden notes in his column that this Turkish Cypriot "boasts of those who killed and burned for those who did not kill him, and indeed see who prevented him from killing prisoners in Karpasia. The Turkish officer! "

As Lewent points out, "Our Greek-Cypriot brother, Mesara, who reads this text, may wonder: Did my father kill him? If I were, I would be wondering. This man who says this, still lives in Famagusta. And I know he's not the only one, there are others. A citizen told us that in the village of Sardarli (Chatzó) a similar one also boasted. He was blamed for melting the head of a Greek Cypriot with stone. "

However, according to the website, the 84-year-old claims that similar incidents have also occurred in the Greek Cypriot community, with some of them also boasting the number of Turks they have killed.

"They still live. They are known, but nobody touches them and is not accountable. And they are not accountable to us. All we do is supposed to cry because there is no solution and peace, "Lewen says.

[H/T: Gatestone Institute, "The Ethnic Cleansing of Northern Cyprus Confessions of a Turkish-Cypriot Mass Murderer", https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12463/cyprus-ethnic-cleansing]
 
I don't think you as a Zionist are in any position to point fingers at others over war crimes.

Anyway, if the Greek Cypriots didn't like being thrashed by Turkey, they shouldn't have been ill-treating the Turk Cypriots.
 
Solomon at it again, the only reason for Turkey to invade was because Turkish Cypriots were massacred, when will you stop using tragedies for your political agenda?
Will we ever see how you post about what happened to Balkan Turks too or will it always only be about Armenians, Kurds and Greek?

Nobody is interested in your crocodile tears...
 
I don't think you as a Zionist are in any position to point fingers at others over war crimes.
Zionists are often accused of "war crimes" but the accusations are almost always false whereas Jews have been true victims of war crimes for years and years so yes, Zionists are particularly qualified to do so.

As discussed many times, Pakistani teachers are forbidden to teach the "but" part: link. However, that doesn't give you an excuse for joining the evil when you could choose to contest such tyranny; at the least you could choose to remain silent, right? And that way you don't divert from the thread topic.
 
Gates of Vienna....

The Greek Cypriot National Guard was raping and murdering the Turk Cypriots on mass before the Turkish intervention. The Turkish army had every right to defend their kin who were virtually defenceless against an armed host.

Well done to my Turkish kin.
 
Zionists are often accused of "war crimes" but the accusations are almost always false whereas Jews have been true victims of war crimes for years and years so yes, Zionists are particularly qualified to do so.

As discussed many times, Pakistani teachers are forbidden to teach the "but" part: link. However, that doesn't give you an excuse for joining the evil when you could choose to contest such tyranny; at the least you could choose to remain silent, right? And that way you don't divert from the thread topic.

Excuses excuses, you won't bring any proof to back your claims, you will only attempt to dodge the argument like always.
 
-the only reason for Turkey to invade was because Turkish Cypriots were massacred -
Doubtful. And note the person interviewed confessed to involvement in Turkey-supported criminal activity even before the 1974 invasion.

Excuses excuses, you won't bring any proof to back your claims, you will only attempt to dodge the argument like always.
I linked to proof of suppression. At that point the burden of proof fell on your shoulders and you promptly dropped it.
 
No, the burden of proof is on YOU since you are making the claim contrary to the commonly believed narrative.
Not at all:

"In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "argument to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition must be true because many or most people believe it, often concisely encapsulated as: "If many believe so, it is so."" Wikipedia
 
Like always, you are derailing the discussion.
Who was it who responded to the OP by questioning my bona fides?

So does this argumentation theory could be used to justify the denial of the scale of the holocaust?
Example: just because (according to one survey) 63% of the people in the Middle East and North Africa who have heard of the Holocaust think it was exaggerated or mythical, that doesn't mean they have the right, just because they are the majority, to assert the Holocaust was exaggerated or mythical as a fact.

A list of commonly-used logical fallacies used by Holocaust-deniers can be found here. I note that many of these fallacious arguments are employed by anti-Zionists here at PDF. That might make anti-Zionists feel good about themselves but these distortions come back to bite Pakistanis, the latest example being the acquittal of the man convicted of stabbing Khadija Siddiqui on the grounds of "lack of proof" even though the eyewitness accounts have been verified by forensic evidence.
 
That guy and his hatred towards Turkishness.. Too bad for him and his kind that we will exist till end of time :D
 
That guy and his hatred towards Turkishness.. Too bad for him and his kind that we will exist till end of time :D
Is it that Cener Leveden hates "Turkishness" or that the person he interviewed reveals what makes "Turkishness" hateful?
 
the latest example being the acquittal of the man convicted of stabbing Khadija Siddiqui on the grounds of "lack of proof" even though the eyewitness accounts have been verified by forensic evidence.

Week prosecution is to blamed for that but anyhow the Supreme Court have taken suo moto notice since then and will decide the case on merit - - - - -. This is phenomenal!

Do Take the rodney king beating episode as an example where the whole incident was filmed but every single one of the cops got acquitted, due to the lack of evidence??

Do you have any idea about what president reagon came up with after the subsequent L. A riots? "We should have waited for the due process - - - ."

So yeah that gives us all the benefit of doubt.


As for the rest of your Caucasian rants let me remind you we are not living in stone age so your argument falls flat - - - .
 
Back
Top Bottom