Turkish Cypriot describes the slaughter of unarmed Greek Cypriots

[xenon54 out]

Doubtful. And note the person interviewed confessed to involvement in Turkey-supported criminal activity even before the 1974 invasion.

History is there you can doubt whatever you want, is one individial gonna be the reference for the history of the Island?

 

[SALMAN F]

If the turks are criminals it doesn't make you good

 

[Solomon2]

Week prosecution is to blamed for that but anyhow the Supreme Court have taken suo moto notice since then and will decide the case on merit - - - - -. This is phenomenal!

I wish I could read the LHC decision.

Do Take the rodney king beating episode as an example where the whole incident was filmed but every single one of the cops got acquitted, due to the lack of evidence??

Imagine if all you saw of the first Star Wars movie was the scene where Skywalker & buddies broke Leia out of prison. Could you tell the good guys from the bad guys just by that sequence? Unlike the TV broadcast footage the jury saw the entire Rodney King film - including the ten seconds cut before the beating showing King charging at the police officers. (Nevertheless, ultimately two police officers were convicted and two acquitted in a separate federal trial.)

History is there you can doubt whatever you want, is one individial gonna be the reference for the history of the Island?

Can't you answer your own question?

 

[Mentee]

Unlike the TV broadcast footage the jury saw the entire Rodney King film - including the ten seconds cut before the beating showing King charging at the police officers. (Nevertheless, ultimately two police officers were convicted and two acquitted in a separate federal trial.)

If they were found innocent by the lower court then why did the federal court had to award two cops 30 months jail time?

And Just to set the record straight the suspect in the stabbing case was earlier sentenced to 7 years imprisonment by a district Court. So he filed an appeal in the higher judicial forum - - - -.

 

[Solomon2]

If they were found innocent by the lower court then why did the federal court had to award two cops 30 months jail time?

Different courts charged different crimes. The local court dismissed the charges of excessive force while the federal court convicted two officers of violating King's civil rights: the judge said the final six blows were unlawful because King was already subdued. (The first twenty or so were O.K. because King was still resisting!)

And Just to set the record straight the suspect in the stabbing case was earlier sentenced to 7 years imprisonment by a district Court. So he filed an appeal in the higher judicial forum - - - -.

It's frustrating not to be able to read the LHC decision.

 

[Mentee]

Different courts charged different crimes

How "smart" of you! Diliberately Ignoring the facts to bring life to your dying arguments? The feds did use the same charges to incriminate those cops - - -.

It's frustrating not to be able to read the LHC decision.

Don't worry you will find another reason to bash our existence anyway---.

 

[xenon54 out]

Can't you answer your own question?

The answer is clear.
Your a pathetic Hasbara troll trying to show Turks as the evil at every opportunity by any means, even if that means to alter the history.

Is all of this a lie?

1974 Cypriot coup d'état
Bloody Christmas (1963)
Maratha, Santalaris and Aloda massacre

Turkey acted as a guarantor power of Cyprus in a legitimate way to protect the Turkish minority on the island and its not going anywhere anytime soon no matter how many anti Turkish articles you post, would be better for you to accept this reality.

 

[Solomon2]

How "smart" of you! Diliberately Ignoring the facts to bring life to your dying arguments? The feds did use the same charges to incriminate those cops - -

What, are you twelve or something?

 

[Mentee]

What, are you twelve or something?

It is quite evident from your getting personal that there is no substance to your logical fallacies - - -..

 

[Solomon2]

Turkey acted as a guarantor power of Cyprus in a legitimate way to protect the Turkish minority -

Turkey was and is the occupying power and as such had and has the obligation to protect all the noncombatant civilians in the area of occupation, not just the "Turkish" ones.

- its not going anywhere anytime soon no matter how many anti Turkish articles you post, would be better for you to accept this reality.

I didn't write I that I didn't accept that Turkish troops aren't leaving Cyprus anytime soon.

Your a pathetic Hasbara troll trying to show Turks as the evil at every opportunity by any means, even if that means to alter the history.

Just because I expose a truth you find embarrassing, does that give you the right to unjustly demean me?

It is quite evident from your getting personal that there is no substance to your logical fallacies - - -..

They are not "my" fallacies: evidence is in the links I provided.

 

[xenon54 out]

Just because I expose a truth you find embarrassing, does that give you the right to unjustly demean me?

You didnt expose anything, look at the numbers, if there is a side that needs to be held responsible for massacres then its the Greek side first before anyone else.
The fact that you ignore this but rush on a mans claims to show how bad Turks are is clearly indicating what you are up to so stop crying im just calling you what you are nothing else.

And im not embarassed of anything, in fact when you posted this thread it reminded me on one of my threads where i enjoyed the pictures of brave Turkish soldiers saving its kin from fanatic Greek army and militia.
Here you can enjoy too.

Never displayed pictures of ''Operation Atilla''

 

[Solomon2]

You didnt expose anything, look at the numbers, if there is a side that needs to be held responsible for massacres then its the Greek side first before anyone else.

No, war crimes laws don't work that way. Just because you think one side got off and should be prosecuted first doesn't give you the excuse to commit war crimes. Indeed, that violates the whole war crimes concept: that there are deeds in war that, regardless of the cause or provocation, can be prosecuted as war crimes.

The fact that you ignore this but rush on a mans claims to show how bad Turks are is clearly indicating what you are up to so stop crying im just calling you what you are nothing else.

No, the article just shows how bad some Turks were.

And im not embarassed of anything, in fact when you posted this thread it reminded me on one of my threads where i enjoyed the pictures of brave Turkish soldiers saving its kin from fanatic Greek army and militia.

I'm not calling the Greeks the "good side", either.

 

[xenon54 out]

No, war crimes laws don't work that way. Just because you think one side got off and should be prosecuted first doesn't give you the excuse to commit war crimes. Indeed, that violates the whole war crimes concept: that there are deeds in war that, regardless of the cause or provocation, can be prosecuted as war crimes.

No, the article just shows how bad some Turks were.

I'm not calling the Greeks the "good side", either.

The point is your terribly one sided behavior, your eager to show Turks as the culprits all the time, but then again being silent on attrocities done towards Turks.
And everytime someone mentions this you come with ''dont shoot the massenger'' BS, who do you think you are fooling here?

 

[Solomon2]

The point is your terribly one sided behavior, your eager to show Turks as the culprits all the time, but then again being silent on attrocities done towards Turks.

Part of that may be the language barrier: not enough stuff written in Turkish gets translated into English, whereas translations from Greek are readily available. And part of that may be the reticence of Turks like yourself at indicting your own ethnic group for its real faults, failings, and crimes. This particular bit was exceptional because while the article is in Greek the sources are Turkish. Yet all that still doesn't excuse Turks for failing to investigate the whole truth and put their own on trial for war crimes - both then and today.

 

[T-123456]

Doubtful. And note the person interviewed confessed to involvement in Turkey-supported criminal activity even before the 1974 invasion.

You know nobody takes this crap serious so why keep on trying?