What's new

Have PAF Missed a trick with this opportnity

The grpien can handle both American & european weapons.

And has its own aesa radar.

THE SWEDES are offering 100% TOT to indians.

The indians are already decided with the F18 SUPER HORNETS. and feel gripen is too similar in size and profile to tejas mk2 and will not buy this beauty.

at half the price of the typhoons & rafaels and 100% TOT the gripen would be the ideal 4.5 generation fighter for PAF hers why

operates on runways.
single engined cheap to maintain
short easy turnround time in sorties
very high end tech with composites, aesa, meteore missles and usa amraam capatibility
sweden as no political issues with pakistan
swedes already selling awacs great match up.
swdes will give pakistan all the know how to mass produce in pakistan.
India will not pick this baby

FORGET THE J10 this is a huge opportunity

"don,t put all your eggs in the chinease basket.
 
The grpien can handle both American & european weapons.

And has its own aesa radar.

THE SWEDES are offering 100% TOT to indians.

The indians are already decided with the F18 SUPER HORNETS. and feel gripen is too similar in size and profile to tejas mk2 and will not buy this beauty.

at half the price of the typhoons & rafaels and 100% TOT the gripen would be the deal 4.5 generation fighter for PAF hers why

operates on runways.
single engined cheap to maintain
easy turnround time in sorties
very high end tech with compsites, aesa, meteore missles and usa amraam capatibility
sweden as no political issues with pakistan
swedes already selling awacs great match up.
swdes will give pakistan all the know how to mass produce in pakistan.
India will not pick this baby

FORGET THE J10 this is a huge opportunity

"don,t put all your eggs in the chinease basket.
I just have to point u out .Gripen C/D is equivalent to our JF17 Thunder.
and we have disscussed in detail tht JF17 Block II is going to be almost equal t Gripen NG. so we actually dont need this plane .

J10 is Medium multi role fighter ,and gripen is light multirole fighter just like our JF17 .
 
In the next indo pak face off regardless of size or scale i can gurantee USA will not rush supplies or parts for F16/F16/52 cause USA * AND INDIA will be at least on good terms and more likely very close.

This was not the case in 1971 & 1965 WEN usa GAVE 100% backing.

Sweden wil remain neutral

Gripen makes sense

IF PAF goes J10 it becomes 80% chinease air force.

euro.usa/chinease would be a better more balanced mix.
 
JF17 does not have a RCS of 1/10th of the F16.

Thunder has nil compsites

no canards no western engines or weapons capability.

Gripen NG is far more advanced than both Thunder and J10. And they are giving 100% TOT.

Its cheap at under $50m each
 
In the next indo pak face off regardless of size or scale i can gurantee USA will not rush supplies or parts for F16/F16/52 cause USA * AND INDIA will be at least on good terms and more likely very close.

This was not the case in 1971 & 1965 WEN usa GAVE 100 backing.

Sweden wil remain neutral

Gripen makes sense

IF PAF goes J10 it becomes 80% chinease air force.

euro.usa/chinease would be a better more balanced mix.

Brother everything is already discussed in very detasil in J10 , and JF17 threads.

We need J10 for Air Role they will be in same league of F16 (more or less).
 
The Gripen will be hit with sanctions as well. I dont see TOT for Pakistan at the moment. So JF17 is the better bet.
 
Storm Force, buddy take a chill pill... are you indian by the way?
 
The Gripen was already evaluated by PAF and rejected because at large it is a modular fighter like our JF17 using components from various sources and secondly it uses General Electric F414G engine which is an offshoot from superhornet engine program. The ToT offer is just a sales pitch by swedes because Pakistan still wont be able to manufacture its engines, weapon system and avionics locally.


Unless Grippen can be extensively modified to accecpt a RD93 or WS13 engine and third parties aggree for avionics and weapon system ToT, it is not a feasible solution.
 
The grpien can handle both American & european weapons.

And has its own aesa radar.

THE SWEDES are offering 100% TOT to indians.

The indians are already decided with the F18 SUPER HORNETS. and feel gripen is too similar in size and profile to tejas mk2 and will not buy this beauty.

at half the price of the typhoons & rafaels and 100% TOT the gripen would be the ideal 4.5 generation fighter for PAF hers why

operates on runways.
single engined cheap to maintain
short easy turnround time in sorties
very high end tech with composites, aesa, meteore missles and usa amraam capatibility
sweden as no political issues with pakistan
swedes already selling awacs great match up.
swdes will give pakistan all the know how to mass produce in pakistan.
India will not pick this baby

FORGET THE J10 this is a huge opportunity

"don,t put all your eggs in the chinease basket.



PAF Air Chief has already stated Pakistan is not getting J-10B but an even advanced version of that. With specific radars and fire control, J-10B will knock JAS 39 out of the sky like mosquitos. The aim with J-10 is to counter the Indian MMRCA/SU30s. JF-17 future blocks can compete or out perfrom Gripen. If you look closely JF-17 resembles Gripen design.

Pakistan shouldn't go for Gripen because it's gonna cost lot of money, and we have already invested in Chinese systems like JF-17, J-10 and AWACs.

end of story.

---------- Post added at 09:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 PM ----------

The grpien can handle both American & european weapons.

And has its own aesa radar.

THE SWEDES are offering 100% TOT to indians.

The indians are already decided with the F18 SUPER HORNETS. and feel gripen is too similar in size and profile to tejas mk2 and will not buy this beauty.

at half the price of the typhoons & rafaels and 100% TOT the gripen would be the ideal 4.5 generation fighter for PAF hers why

operates on runways.
single engined cheap to maintain
short easy turnround time in sorties
very high end tech with composites, aesa, meteore missles and usa amraam capatibility
sweden as no political issues with pakistan
swedes already selling awacs great match up.
swdes will give pakistan all the know how to mass produce in pakistan.
India will not pick this baby

FORGET THE J10 this is a huge opportunity

"don,t put all your eggs in the chinease basket.




What do you mean by "....operates on runways..."???? I mean where else do you expect them to operate from? Your backyard?
 
JF17 does not have a RCS of 1/10th of the F16.

Thunder has nil compsites

no canards no western engines or weapons capability.

Gripen NG is far more advanced than both Thunder and J10. And they are giving 100% TOT.

Its cheap at under $50m each



You should refer to the JF-17 Farnborough airshow thread.

People clearly said that the Gripen sales people were asked that everything in Gripen is being offered in JF-17s. So why the high cost? The guy was speechless.



Also, by just using composites you cannot reduce the RCA. Radar waves are electromagnetic waves which can detect even composites easily. Because the overall size of JF-17 is smaller than F-16 with Engine blades hidden and shorter tail fin, it is bound to have smaller RCA than f-16
 
we dnt need Gripen bocz we have jf-17 for that role.

regards
 
hey if we want a new aircraft then we will go to 100+ J-10 as it will be much cheaper to acquire as well as to maintain the aircraft. And the tech is as hi as Grippen NG's and it will not be known to anyone.....................
 

Back
Top Bottom