What's new

Xiaomi shows Arunachal is in India at handset launch, triggers anger in China

Status
Not open for further replies.
You started a war against us, while we were in the middle of the worst famine of our history (Great leap forward), and when we were on the brink of collapse from starvation. And you still lost.
you have written this same post million times here on PDF. famine...starvation....lol:rofl::rofl:
but truth is china back stabbed us. it wont change with your desperate attempt to be victim. :coffee:
 
China Bans 'Western Values' From Textbooks | The Daily Caller
lol, will a tiger have any insecurity like that? Tiger live a free life and he fear none, please don't abuse such a fearless creature by comparing it with chinese.

We would take those good educational values from the west, but not those deceptions and lies with the sole purpose to trigger the chaos in our country.

A tiger was born with the high alert mentality, he cannot roam freely on those highly dangerous jungles.
 
A state that is dependent on importing at-least 70% of military hardware for her defense is talking about taking on an opponent that is almost self-reliant in her defense needs. That in itself is a joke.

hahahaha we give them money we don't buy those hardware free of cost.We fight our battles with our money not like Pakistan. China is getting self reliant now so India is beginning too but what is Pakistan doing. Stop feeling proud of other's achievements and achieve something yourself.
 
Not really, at least China has developed the extremely advanced thermonuclear warhead (same class as the W88) more than 20 years ago.

And we have fully detonated and tested it.

Chinese Set Off Their Biggest Nuclear Explosion - NYTimes.com

However, India is still lagging behind by a lot, and you haven't successfully detonated a 100k nuclear warhead yet in a real test.

China has the full capability to mount its nuclear stockpile on par with the US and Russia if she really wants, while you guys still being at the initial stage.

Nope, to be frank, you are not the one the same league with us.

1) We do not need a working thermonuclear device to inflict unacceptable damage on you. Damage which can inflict in terms of reach, accuracy, quantum, and survivability. Assured. Backed up.

2) China's fissile stocks and production forecasts guarantee you an eventual stockpile of between 500-800 nukes. India's to an eventual much debated number that stands around 400-500. Neither is enough to fight a nuclear war, seeing our respective sizes. But both are more than enough to destroy each of us as functioning modern nation states, and WAY more than enough to inflict many magnitudes of each state's thresholds of "unacceptable damage." Effective deterrence.

3) We do not need to be in the "same league" as you to deter you. Given the missile technology, Pakistan could deter you if it wanted to, or was forced into.

The two significant areas where you are effectively ahead of us are:

1) You capability to deter the US

2) You conventional first strike superiority
 
China Bans 'Western Values' From Textbooks | The Daily Caller
lol, will a tiger have any insecurity like that? Tiger live a free life and he fear none, please don't abuse such a fearless creature by comparing it with chinese.

Chinese people paint their dogs like tigers and lions, even the Chinese tiger they are bragging about is FAKE! :D

That is a good name. If you have connections in BJP, give them this proposal. Modi might consider an official name change. Akshay Hind :lol:

Add North Arunachal Pradesh (Tibet) also. :)
 
We would take those good educational values from the west, but not those deceptions and lies with the sole purpose to trigger the chaos in our country.

A tiger was born with the high alert mentality, he cannot roam freely on those highly dangerous jungles.
again that doesn't rule out the insecurity you guys have. I have no problem what CPC do in China but just don't abuse tiger by comparing it with china.
 
Not really, at least China has developed the extremely advanced thermonuclear warhead (same class as the W88) more than 20 years ago.

And we have fully detonated and tested it.

Chinese Set Off Their Biggest Nuclear Explosion - NYTimes.com

However, India is still lagging behind by a lot, and you haven't successfully detonated a 100k nuclear warhead yet in a real test.

China has the full capability to mount its nuclear stockpile on par with the US and Russia if she really wants, while you guys still being at the initial stage.

Nope, to be frank, you are not the one on the same league with us.

Why should we disclose our true capabilities?
 
1) We do not need a working thermonuclear device to inflict unacceptable damage on you. Damage which can inflict in terms of reach, accuracy, quantum, and survivability. Assured. Backed up.

2) China's fissile stocks and production forecasts guarantee you an eventual stockpile of between 500-800 nukes. India's to an eventual much debated number that stands around 400-500. Neither is enough to fight a nuclear war, seeing our respective sizes. But both are more than enough to destroy each of us as functioning modern nation states, and WAY more than enough to inflict many magnitudes of each state's thresholds of "unacceptable damage." Effective deterrence.

3) We do not need to be in the "same league" as you to deter you. Given the missile technology, Pakistan could deter you if it wanted to, or was forced into.

Both China and India have enough Urarium or Plutonium to make over 10000 nukes.

For China, there is not technical difficulty to achieve that, but the only reason that we won't do that is because these 10000 nukes will eventually become your gigantic liability when they are facing the expiration.

Even in the future, both USA and Russia won't keep that much of nukes, so we don't have to follow their old path. It is not because we don't have this capability.

As for India, you have the technical difficulties to miniaturize your nuclear warhead, that's the only reason that pulls your back about the quantity.

Why should we disclose our true capabilities?

Then just detonate one super advanced thermonuclear warhead, then we can see your true capability.
 
:lol:
Like I said, they don't need to declassify it in order to check it with their own copy, and then declare it is fake.
But they can't do that. Because they know it's not. :azn:
And they should know, they have their own copy.

Thats because GoI don't want to start unnecessary controversies regarding Henderson report. If the GoI were to make an official statement that the report is fake then everyone including our crazy media is going to put immense pressure on GoI to declassify the report to prove that Maxwell's Henderson report is fake.
 
Last edited:
Both China and India have enough Urarium or Plutonium to make over 10000 nukes.

I was speaking about fissile stocks and future production.

Both of which take time (easy to calculate based on capacity, which is no secret) and a LOT of money.

And yes, nukes are a perishable resource. And very expensive to maintain.
 
I was speaking about fissile stocks and future production.

Both of which take time (easy to calculate based on capacity, which is no secret) and a LOT of money.

And yes, nukes are a perishable resource. And very expensive to maintain.

We have almost as much of Uranium reserve as the US, and our current industrial capability is bigger than them.

Do you truly believe that we cannot make 10000 nukes?

List of countries by uranium reserves - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of countries by future Industrial Output - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
A state that is dependent on importing at-least 70% of military hardware for her defense is talking about taking on an opponent that is almost self-reliant in her defense needs. That in itself is a joke.
Thank you for bringing something ABSOLUTELY irrelevant to this thread. :)

We have almost as much of Uranium reserve as the US, and our current industrial capability is bigger than them.

Do you truly believe that we cannot make 10000 nukes?

List of countries by uranium reserves - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of countries by future Industrial Output - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Of course you can make them. And chances are you will make them. But then they might just be distributed to the nascent states like Guanxi, Shanxi, Mengukkuo, Manchukuo, Xibei San Ma, Yunnan. Not to mention historically non Chinese territories like Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet and Xinxiang.
 
Last edited:
Why should they? Government don't need to react to every internet report, that's not possible also. Tomorrow you will say whatever you post in internet is true unless governments intervene? That's a silly expectation.

Yes, because the Earth-shaking leak of the Henderson-Brooks report was so insignificant that they didn't even bother checking their own copy to see if it was fake or not, right? :P
 
Thank you for bringing something ABSOLUTELY irrelevant to this thread. :)


Of course you can make them. And chances are you will make them. But then they might just be distributed to the nascent states like Guanxi, Shanxi, Mengukkuo, Manchukuo, Xibei San Ma, Yunna. Not to mention historically non Chinese territories like Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet and Xinxiang.

LMAO, even Russia with a much smaller economy can maintain those nukes, so why China cannot sustain it?

Instead of overdone the number of the nuclear stockpile, we are focusing on the more advanced futuristic weapons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom