What's new

China demands UK enters talks with Argentina over Falklands slamming 'colonial legacy'

NATO allies are certainly not as stupid as you. The Malvinas is not British, let alone British mainland.

You're forgetting the composition of current interests around the globe.

The NATO bloc would not be in any mood to lose land anywhere across the globe in the modern day, as this would only lead to the yarn of wool being untied and unraveling uncontrollably.

If the Argentines capture The Falklands the Britain is not capable of taking the isles back, it would definitely lead to a coalition counter offensive of sorts.
 
Nope, it's ours.

Argentina can try and take it if they dare, but I doubt they'd be prepared for the ***-whooping Part 2

Regime change though

Falklands War ended June 14th, 1982
Leopoldo Galtieri steps down 4 days later on June 18th, 1982 after riots.

The country turned against him and started digging up reasons to send him to prison. He got 12 years.

If current President Alberto Fernández wants a round 2..well...
 
Last edited:
Regime change though

Falklands War ended June 14th, 1982
Leopoldo Galtieri steps down 4 days later June 18th, 1982 after riots.

The country turned against him and started digging up reasons to send him to prison. He got 12 years.

If Leopoldo Galtieri wants a round 2..well...
Interesting to watch many UK ships feed the fishes in Malvinas round 2.
Last time round UK was lucky because the French betrayed Argentina by stopping the supply of Exocet missiles.

In round 2, UK ships will become artificial coral reefs at the ocean bottom with compliments from Chinese missiles.
.
 
You're forgetting the composition of current interests around the globe.

The NATO bloc would not be in any mood to lose land anywhere across the globe in the modern day, as this would only lead to the yarn of wool being untied and unraveling uncontrollably.

If the Argentines capture The Falklands the Britain is not capable of taking the isles back, it would definitely lead to a coalition counter offensive of sorts.

You are making a decision for NATO allies that goes beyond their mandate.
 
Interesting to watch many UK ships feed the fishes in Malvinas round 2.
Last time round UK was lucky because the French betrayed Argentina by stopping the supply of Exocet missiles.

In round 2, UK ships will become artificial coral reefs at the ocean bottom with compliments from Chinese missiles.
.

and YJ-18. YJ-21😂😂😂
 
You are making a decision for NATO allies that goes beyond their mandate.
And you're making a decision for China that is not within their doctrine or nature
 
And you're making a decision for China that is not within their doctrine or nature

China's policy of supporting Argentina in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity is consistent.
 
China's policy of supporting Argentina in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity is consistent.

But it's not sovereign territory of Argentina, as the population claim British identity and there are no Argentine settlements on the Islands. That means the Argentine claim is nothing but word of mouth, and completely illegitimate, with it being in their interests to take the islands rather than having a moral reason
 
And you're making a decision for China that is not within their doctrine or nature
China has made some kind of commitment to Argentina. Otherwise, China will not raise the Malvinas issue at UNSC.

of course. China is openly interfering in both countries (unabashedly). This is very rare.
 
Last edited:
Falklands, Chinese jet fighters and the pro Beijing lobby in Argentine Defense and Diplomacy


Screenshot_20230702_212939.jpg


 
Last edited:
They are natives now regardless, that is the fact.
Illegal settlers, not natives, can I occupy London, kill all Londoners, and claim London is not part of the UK?
Anglo Saxon bandit logic must never be admitted
 
Illegal settlers, not natives, can I occupy London, kill all Londoners, and claim London is not part of the UK?
Anglo Saxon bandit logic must never be admitted

? What settlers did the Falklanders supposedly kill?
 
Illegal settlers, not natives, can I occupy London, kill all Londoners, and claim London is not part of the UK?
Anglo Saxon bandit logic must never be admitted
Irrational analogy.

The city of London is colossally more pivotal than the small Argentine settlement that existed temporarily on the Falklands

? What settlers did the Falklanders supposedly kill?
Only one Argentine settlement was destroyed, and that was courtesy of the Americans in 1840, and that was in regard to a completely different conflict altogether
 
Irrational analogy.

The city of London is colossally more pivotal than the small Argentine settlement that existed temporarily on the Falklands


Only one Argentine settlement was destroyed, and that was courtesy of the Americans in 1840, and that was in regard to a completely different conflict altogether

That's the only one I remember.
The usual Chinese pulling facts out of their @ss...as if they really know anything.
 

Back
Top Bottom