What's new

A first for the PAF ? JF-17 Elephant Walk.

Now that logical !
Ok Windjammer, now that's how you argue ;-), please learn from MK. ( By the way MK, enjoy the long weekend ;-) )

So It's decided then. When 4 PAF jets of any kind are parked close to each other, we shall declare it an Elephant Walk.
 
Now that logical !
Ok Windjammer, now that's how you argue ;-), please learn from MK. ( By the way MK, enjoy the long weekend ;-) )

So It's decided then. When 4 PAF jets of any kind are parked close to each other, we shall declare it an Elephant Walk.

Take your eyes off the telescope and look at the bigger picture. How do you think squadrons practice for elephant walk? By immediately bringing the entire squadron on the runway? Not very logical.

And the second picture is showing a very desirable capability of the Thunder. The birds have been prepared on the runway itself for the elephant walk. It is the kind of capability that Grippen boasts, and now the Thunder is displaying the same.

Now stop trolling or face the mods.
 
Hi,

Okasy---look at it this way---. The USAF has over 2000 F16's---yet there are only 28 available for an elephant walk---.

The Paf has only 100 thunders---so if 4 are making the elephant walk---%tage wise it is a bigger %tage---:o::o::o:---no!!!!

The definition in the USAF means that they send up everything they got (at a certain airbase).
If PAF only can send up four JF-17s at that base because of maintenance, then it is still an Elephant Walk (but nothing to brag about).
 
The definition in the USAF means that they send up everything they got (at a certain airbase).
If PAF only can send up four JF-17s at that base because of maintenance, then it is still an Elephant Walk (but nothing to brag about).

Cardinal.

Did you know that the african elephants are larger than asian elephants---.

Maybe the Paf had pygmy elephants---hehn----!
 
Cardinal.

Did you know that the african elephants are larger than asian elephants---.

Maybe the Paf had pygmy elephants---hehn----!
7B48C5E6-6E55-4A84-833A-7312D9290132.jpeg
 
Seriously, with four fighters?

:crazy::rofl:
A Bharti and a multi ID stray should be the last person to make a remark.....after all didn't your Agni Pankh stood up a squadron of Tejas.....with two aircraft. :lol:

What?

After trying so much to say that ONLY 4 parked jets can perform an ELEPHANT WALK, you are arguing that you need at least 20 jets taxiing ;-)

How confused are you? And what can we do to help you learn more ?
Sincerely,
Educated , Knowledgeable Members
Your idiocy is complete since you are now even incompetent to comprehend as to what i was replying to but then out of desperation you are often known to behave like a headless chicken. Keep up your antics to prove to all that the duffer title is indeed befitting for you.

Take your eyes off the telescope and look at the bigger picture. How do you think squadrons practice for elephant walk? By immediately bringing the entire squadron on the runway? Not very logical.

And the second picture is showing a very desirable capability of the Thunder. The birds have been prepared on the runway itself for the elephant walk. It is the kind of capability that Grippen boasts, and now the Thunder is displaying the same.

Now stop trolling or face the mods.
Yaar, you have spoilt it and helped these creatures out. There's nothing better to see than these pea brain things behaving like a Monkey which has just spotted a Banana. Albeit a picture of a full squadron of JF-17s parked on apron was posted here but no one knew they also did an Elephant Walk afterwards.
As for MODS, seems their eyes and ears are also fasting. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Seriously, with four fighters?

:crazy::rofl:

So you think if there are 4 elephants they will not walk, they will wait for 28 more to join them to start walking.
Elephant walk is formation, it has noting to do with fixed set of numbers.
If you have seen how elephants walk in group, close to each other, one behind other or on aside other, you will realize its about the pattern and not the count.

Offcourse if there is just one fighter, they will not like to term it as elephant walk.
 
So you think if there are 4 elephants they will not walk, they will wait for 28 more to join them to start walking.
Elephant walk is formation, it has noting to do with fixed set of numbers.
If you have seen how elephants walk in group, close to each other, one behind other or on aside other, you will realize its about the pattern and not the count.

Offcourse if there is just one fighter, they will not like to term it as elephant walk.
So you think if there are 4 elephants they will not walk, they will wait for 28 more to join them to start walking.
Elephant walk is formation, it has noting to do with fixed set of numbers.
If you have seen how elephants walk in group, close to each other, one behind other or on aside other, you will realize its about the pattern and not the count.

Offcourse if there is just one fighter, they will not like to term it as elephant walk.


For me, elephant walk means..

The taxiing of large numbers of aircraft to takeoff in single file in nose-to-tail formations said that they looked like elephants walking to the next watering hole.

By the way if single elephant walks then even we called elephant walk in general terms.

I talking about terms use in aeronautics.
 
Anyone who has been to PAF Peshawar will witness 4 ship formations quite often. They taxi together and take off in 2x formations of 2. It's not an elephant walk, confirmed from a PAF official.
 
Anyone who has been to PAF Peshawar will witness 4 ship formations quite often. They taxi together and take off in 2x formations of 2. It's not an elephant walk, confirmed from a PAF official.
And this image is not from Peshawar....besides it's just part of a bigger picture.

Thunders on Elephant walk.. #jf17 #thunder #paf #elephantwalk #minhas #pakistanairforce #pakistan #pakforces
 
As for MODS, seems their eyes and ears are also fasting. :lol:

Here's you replying to you ;-)

No Basanti, i don't need MODS to handle people who consider themselves whiter than white.

The thing is, I've been keeping a far higher standard of posts than you ever did. The only reason you're feeling the heat is because many members these days point out your fake posts!

Now you reply to you , replying to you.... ( Inception style)
 
Here's you replying to you ;-)



The thing is, I've been keeping a far higher standard of posts than you ever did. The only reason you're feeling the heat is because many members these days point out your fake posts!

Now you reply to you , replying to you.... ( Inception style)
Oh yea you and high standards.....when you have to run back to five year old threads to salvage your ego and here you are again proving your desperation by getting yourself in a twist.
Well let me bring you down to the earth, i never ever called out the MODS since you are not worthy of it....even here i was merely replying to the member.
You see if you had any standards, you would address the post (regardless of it's nature or substance)...but like a typical village auntie, all you efforts and arguments focus on, you said this to me five years ago, i meant this when i said this in front of that at such a time.....get a life .....even if it's a fake one.
 
Back
Top Bottom