Zakir Naik's Peace TV fined £300,000 for hate speeches as it pulls out of the UK

[Clutch]

He has literally thousands of lectures. Which one?

If you don't like a certain person, that is fine, that is your prerogative. Just don't accuse someone of something he isn't.

Next time do your own homework...

 

[xeuss]

Next time do your own homework...

Your arguments are not making sense.

You are basically equaling faith in Islam with loyalty to Pakistan. I am sorry, but I am not a better or worse Muslim just based on my opinion of Pakistan. The same applies to Zakir Naik.

At the end, he will be judged for his sins. Having an opinion on Pakistan does not constitute a sin.

 

[Clutch]

YAWN. "You've" been killing each other since the Prophet died (Sunni vs Shia).

Can't even help the Rohingya... Malaysia is turning them back and Malay Muslims there appear to be sick of them.

So much for the ummah

Everybody has been killing each other... It's part of human condition not exclusive to Muslims.

But there is something about Muslim brotherhood and kinship you will never know of from books and media... It's in Salah in row shoulder to shoulder. ... You will never know that.

Your arguments are not making sense.

You are basically equaling faith in Islam with loyalty to Pakistan. I am sorry, but I am not a better or worse Muslim just based on my opinion of Pakistan. The same applies to Zakir Naik.

At the end, he will be judged for his sins. Having an opinion on Pakistan does not constitute a sin.

As a Pakistani it matters to me...

 

[xeuss]

As a Pakistani it matters to me...

Pakistan is a nation state. People living outside a nation state will never have any loyalty or kindred towards it. To expect that from a non-Pakistani is simply very fallacious.

 

[Clutch]

Pakistan is a nation state. People living outside a nation state will never have any loyalty or kindred towards it. To expect that from a non-Pakistani is simply very fallacious.

He hates pakistan ... I hate him. It's ironic what's happening to him now.... He needs a 'Pakistan' to run to now and save his arse!

Pakistan ka mathlab kia? La ilaha Illallah.

 

[xeuss]

He hates pakistan ... I hate him. It's ironic what's happening to him now.... He needs a 'Pakistan' to run to now and save his arse!

You can hate him all you like for not liking Pakistan. Just don't make him a lesser Muslim based on that.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Next time do your own homework...

I agree with his views on Pakistan.

So what?

Creation of Pakistan is good for the Muslims of Pakistan - CERTAINLY. This is also true.

He hates pakistan ... I hate him. It's ironic what's happening to him now.... He needs a 'Pakistan' to run to now and save his arse!

Pakistan ka mathlab kia? La ilaha Illallah.

He does not hate Pakistan.

This is a more complicated position. If you come out of your nationalistic cocoon, tag me. I will explain.

 

[Dalit]

YAWN. "You've" been killing each other since the Prophet died (Sunni vs Shia).

Can't even help the Rohingya... Malaysia is turning them back and Malay Muslims there appear to be sick of them.

So much for the ummah

This logic can also be applied to other religions, cultures, ethnic groups and humans in general. This is not necessarily a Muslim phenomenon. Christians, Jews, Europeans, Americans, Red Indians, Pharaohs, Inca's and many other religions/civilizations have been infighting for decades and even centuries. Europeans have been waging mass crusades among themselves with millions slaughtered. Hindus have invented a caste system where the lower caste are discriminated and even killed by the elite caste for various transgressions. Fact is that humans have been slaughtering each other irrespective of caste and creed. Let's not generalize. In the end it is all about the lust for more power.

Muslims have not been killing each other since the prophet passed away. That is factually incorrect. Shia Sunni conflict is a relatively new dispute. The two main culprits responsible for this conflict are solely spreading disinformation and fighting their proxy wars on other soils. Shia and Sunni get along well in their native countries. Both have coexisted peacefully for centuries as communities all around the world until the two culprits decided to fight out their disagreements abroad.

There are countless religious and ethnic groups living in various parts of the world that are abandoned by even developed nations despite sharing close religious and other ties. Whilst various Muslim nations not taking in Rohingya or other oppressed groups is regrettable, but hardly an exception.

The so much for Ummah swipe is factually inaccurate. Your own country Sri Lanka has seen a devastating conflict for years between two different groups. Does that mean that Sri Lankans are by default a bloodthirsty bunch? You should know better before letting your mouth loose.

 

[Clutch]

I agree with his views on Pakistan.

So what?

Creation of Pakistan is good for the Muslims of Pakistan - CERTAINLY. This is also true.

He said Pakistan was a mistake... Today's he is running for his life looking for a "Pakistan" to save his arse..... Irony!

 

[cloud4000]

Indian Muslims need to pickup AK-47S and fight for their freedom from Hindutva Terrorism and extermination of Muslims by the Modi RSS

Another self-righteous Pakistani telling Indian Muslims what they should or should no do.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Two UK television stations, whose founder has been banned from the country for almost a decade, have been fined £300,000 for inciting murder and broadcasting hate speeches.

The media regulator Ofcom found that four programmes on Peace TV and Peace TV Urdu breached broadcasting rules on incitement to commit crime, hate speech, abuse and offence after it aired diatribes that described people “worse than animals” and advocated the execution of magicians.

It ruled that the broadcasts were “very serious” and could encourage vulnerable viewers to commit killings.

The watchdog had threatened to strip the stations, which claimed to reach 200 million viewers, of the licences but both voluntarily surrendered them last November.

“In this case, the potential for very serious harm if this material incited others was clear, “ the watchdog said.

“Ofcom was concerned that the statements made by the scholar had the clear potential to influence impressionable viewers by encouraging serious crime, up to and including murder, and/or leading to disorder in relation to members of the public, in particular to Muslim people practicing magic as part of their faith.

“We also found that the scholar’s religious standing gave his statements greater weight and authority with the viewer, which compounded the seriousness of the breach. Ofcom considers the potential harm arising from such hate speech to be very serious.”

Both the satellite stations are funded by UK registered charity the Islamic Research Foundation International.

The licence for Peace TV was held by Lord Productions Limited, which has been fined £100,000, and Club TV, which held the licence for Peace TV Urdu, has been fined £200,000 over the breaches.

British regulator set to strip broadcasting licence of TV station linked to Qatar’s Al Rayan bank

“In reaching its decision on the imposition of a sanction in this case, Ofcom has taken full account of the need to ensure that any penalty acts as a deterrent, including to other broadcasters,” it added.

“In this case Ofcom believed that a financial penalty was necessary to reflect the serious nature of the Code breaches and to act as an effective incentive to comply with the Code, for other licensees.”

Club TV and Lord Productions Limited are both owned by parent company Universal Broadcasting Corporation Limited.

Ofcom previously fined Club TV £65,000 for hate speech violations in 2016.

Indian-born Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, who is based in Malaysia, founded UBCL and is also the founder and chair of the IRFI charity.

Two of the breaches related to him.

The 53-year-old, who preached on the stations, is banned from the UK, India and Bangladesh and is accused by the Indian government of laundering £23m.

India and Bangladesh have accused him of inspiring terror acts, after the perpetrators of two separate attacks had allegedly followed his sermons.

In 2010, Britain banned Mr Naik from entering the country, citing “unacceptable behaviour”, although it never spelled out the nature of the behaviour.

https://www.thenational.ae/world/pe...-speeches-as-it-pulls-out-of-the-uk-1.1019484

Pure Islamophobia.

 

[Clutch]

He does not hate Pakistan.

This is a more complicated position. If you come out of your nationalistic cocoon, tag me. I will explain.

He says d Pakistan should not have been created... Because if pakistan didn't exist more Muslims of india would mean more influence of Muslims vin India... Lol.

So if 200 Million current Muslims of India aren't enough to save themselves from Hindutva Terrorism and second class status???... He wants to pull us free Pakistani into that hell hole??!!

Thank God for Pakistan! Thank God for our honor and freedoms!!!

Another self-righteous Pakistani telling Indian Muslims what they should or should no do.

They are being lynched and exterminated by Hindutvaism

 

[Ultima Reaper]

good. extremist preachers such as this lunatic must be duly punished.

Go and first teach your hate filled yogis..sadhvis..bjp rss thugs.. withch hunt of innocent muslim

 

[AfrazulMandal]

He associates Hindu idolatry with monotheism.

No. He condemns it as shirk and even refused to condemn the demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas. If you don't know something about someone, please don't show your ignorance.

What he said was the Hindu scripture also spoke of Monotheism and to AVOID idolatory.

He says d Pakistan should not have been created... Because if pakistan didn't exist more Muslims of india would mean more influence of Muslims vin India... Lol.

So if 200 Million current Muslims of India aren't enough to save themselves from Hindutva Terrorism and second class status???... He wants to pull us free Pakistani into that hell hole??!!

Thank God for Pakistan! Thank God for our honor and freedoms!!!

His position is different.

His approach to this is purely religious.

Nation states are human creations and hence he is against them. Practically - dividing nations hinders the spread of Deen. He considers the view of Maududi and Deedat - a united Muslim population of India would have been able to establish a more just system and do better Dawaah to bring about a greater change.

Breathe and think about it first. It may go against nationalistic ideals of yours but it does deserve a second think.

I know you will say, how could a Hindu majority in South Asia have submitted to Islamic sermons?
He believes it possible considering the parallels to the Prophet's SAW era.

Do think about it.

They are being lynched and exterminated by Hindutvaism

yes. Who is denying that?

 

[Clutch]

No. He condemns it as shirk and even refused to condemn the demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas. If you don't know something about someone, please don't show your ignorance.

What he said was the Hindu scripture also spoke of Monotheism and to AVOID idolatory.

He plays both sides. Before his banishment by the BJP government... He was a proponent of Hindu-Muslim Bhai-Bhai BS!

He used the mantra of Pakistan bashing to appease the Hindus of India. Trying to be more Loyal than the King.

Now he is running for his life... Looking for a "Pakistan"... Lol.

What a looser!!!