What's new

Zakir Naik will be extradited if request is made by Indian govt, Malaysian deputy PM

Legal process for Zakir Naik’s extradition from Malaysia almost done: Govt

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...letion-govt/story-9msDT597Jg9H5cPHHi7ayJ.html


foundation-research-founder-conference-islamic-preacher-islamic_246e428a-c54c-11e7-a621-6b23f0f703d9.jpg



India’s legal process for approaching Malaysia for the extradition of Zakir Naik, charged by the NIA for radicalising youths, is “nearing completion” and soon an official request will be sent, the external affairs ministry said on Thursday.

Ministry of external affairs (MEA) spokesperson Raveesh Kumar also said that the ministry’s internal process was underway in the case.

“The formal request for assistance of a foreign government in such cases requires a legal process. We are nearing the completion of this exercise. Soon an official request will be made to the Malaysian government. The internal process we have to complete is also underway,” he said.

According to media reports, Naik was in Malaysia after obtaining permanent residency five years ago.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has charged Naik and the Mumbai-based non-profit Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) that he founded in 1991 with indulging in unlawful activities and promoting religious hatred.

The government has imposed a five-year ban on the IRF under the country’s anti-terror laws and has declared Naik an absconder.


Malaysia Refuses To Revoke Naik’s Permanent Residency Status, Says He Will Be Sent Back If India Asks

https://swarajyamag.com/insta/malay...-status-says-will-send-him-back-if-india-asks


Islamist televangelist Zakir Naik will be sent back to India if New Delhi seeks his extradition, Malaysia’s deputy Prime Minister has said.

According to Malay Mail Online, deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi told the Malaysian Parliament that India had not requested Naik’s extradition yet, adding that Kuala Lumpur will send the fugitive back if New Delhi requests via the Mutual Legal Assistance framework between the two countries.

He also said that Naik had not applied for Malaysian citizenship.

Until now, there is no application [from Naik] to become a citizen. If India requests that he be extradited via Mutual Legal Assistance, we will send him. To date, there has been no request,” the deputy prime minister was quoted as saying.

The deputy prime minister, however, refused to revoke Naik's permanent residency status in Malaysia, saying the televangelist had not violated any local laws.

“As long as he does not violate the laws, and did not do any wrong, what more like Ipoh Barat (MP, M. Kulasegaran) had said, that he had encouraged terrorism, that he had encouraged things which involve the degrading and criticising of other faith. We never received reports on that,” the deputy prime minister said.

The Indian government had in July revoked the passport of the fugitive preacher following a recommendation from the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

The radical preacher, wanted in India in cases related to terrorism and money laundering, is seeking Malaysian citizenship, PTI had reported in May.

Naik has been changing bases frequently, shuttling between the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Southeast Asian countries since the NIA approached Interpol for the issuance of a Red Corner Notice against him.

Hindus in Malaysia, mostly Tamils, have been protesting against Naik’s extended stay in their country, demanding authorities to not provide him a safe haven.

The chairman of HINDRAF (Hindu Rights Action Force), P Waythamoorthy, has called for the United Nation’s Counter-Terrorism Committee to advise Malaysia to deny Naik a safe haven in the country and to revoke his permanent resident status.

However, Hindu groups and temples have come under pressure from authorities in Malaysia to not oppose Naik’s activities in the country.

Naik has also attacked Hindu groups in the country. In a video that went viral on social media in March, Naik attacked HINDRAF, asking why Hindu groups had the right to criticise an Islamic mufti in a Muslim-majority country.
 
.
My man! zakir naik recently stated he is against the creation of Pakistan.

Zakir Naik is paying the price for his arrogance. For all his education his is a grand fool. Muslims do not learn, we hack at each other whilst our enemies encircle us.

Wahhabi types like him have spent decades preaching all over SE Asia (and the rest of the world) that barelvi's are not Muslims, Shia are not Muslim, sufi practices are not tolerated in islam. Today he stands alone when the wolves are at his door. Even some other Muslims have turned on him - what can you expect when you make a living comparing them to idol worshippers.

Our barelvi's and other types of sufi's will soon face the music too. Once these people are done fighting the "wahhabi's" they will turn on us. Nobody asked at partition what firqa you belonged to before chopping you down, nobody asked the Syrians if they practice tassuwuf before destroying their homes and families.

I live in the UK and the focus of the state propaganda machine has already shifted from the wahhabi's to the deobandi's. It starts off with "documentaries" on the less popular channels like radio4, or outright hatemongers like brietbart and eventually it becomes the mainstream narrative. In another 10-20 years time it will be the turn of the sufi's too.

The shia should not think they are immune either. They have won victories in Iraq and Syria, now they're setting you up to fight in Lebanon with Saudi on one side and Israel and Eygpt on the other. They will let Iran overstretch and then knock it down.

Muslims deserve this humiliation because we bring it upon ourselves. We might not recognise a Muslim identity but our enemies do.
 
.
He has reasons of his own.
One man's junk is another man's gold.
Yes, then why would Pakistan grant him Nationality or he made request since he is against the formation of that country
 
.
Yes, then why would Pakistan grant him Nationality or he made request since he is against the formation of that country

His opinion alone can not be a criteria for Pakistan to admit or deny him a place in Pakistan.
 
.
His opinion alone can not be a criteria for Pakistan to admit or deny him a place in Pakistan.
Yes, and further give everyone the excuse of being a safe haven for terrorists.

His speeches had influenced the bangladeshi terrorists who attacked the cafe in dhaka.
He had supported bin laden in his speeches.
That is enough to label him as a terrorist sympathiser at any global platform.
 
.
.
He's against Pakistans creation so I don't see why we should accept him. Maybe the Saudis or Iran can take him in.

@The Sandman @Psychic

He wont go to Saudi or Iran, they will send him back.
Pakistan wont.

The fellow is not anti Pakistani.
Many south Indian Muslims did not opt for Pakistan anyway.

Yes, and further give everyone the excuse of being a safe haven for terrorists.

His speeches had influenced the bangladeshi terrorists who attacked the cafe in dhaka.
He had supported bin laden in his speeches.
That is enough to label him as a terrorist sympathiser at any global platform.


Those speeches came from him within India.
Why they did not arrest him at that time?
 
. . . .
Money laundering and radicalising several Indian Muslim youths through his speeches .
I see!
And what do you think? He is involved or it is jut another farce, a "feel good" activity?
 
.
I see!
And what do you think? He is involved or it is jut another farce, a "feel good" activity?

On money laundering charges only they would get him, other charges seem flimsy, because whatever he has been saying, been saying openly and within India.

But the irony here being, Modi friendly Adani & Ambanis are laundering million times more that him and are sitting pretty.
 
.
Those speeches came from him within India.
Why they did not arrest him at that time?

Our bad, should have done it a long time ago, but people like kept wining for freedom of speech. But when the dhaka attacks happened, we got the excuse.
 
.
I am sure he must have got the best lawyer here, but he (lawyer) can only do so much as for as money laundering status of this imbroglio.
 
.
What is he accused of?
@ashok321 @Joe Shearer anyone?
I see!
And what do you think? He is involved or it is jut another farce, a "feel good" activity?

Money laundering, quite probably; as far as radicalising is concerned, he delivers the standard Salafi line, and sounds terrible in an Indian context.

While he is irritating, I feel uncomfortable about his prosecution; free speech is for the obnoxious ones too, isn't it?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom