Zaid Hamid tells about 1965

[WAR-rior]

Which Cantt did you target - if it were Amritsar Cantt, you certainly were successful. Indian Army never even came close to Lahore Cantt. What are you talking about.

.
(Pay Attention to your scholars who are spectale to the 65 war than you who were even not born)
Indians reached til BRBD.

I do not also know as to who told you that a small operation in areas south of Pir Panjal range, like Gibraltar, would have been launched to capture the whole of Indian Occupied Kashmir. And if the Indian Armed Forces went to war with Pakistan by launching multiple operations across the international border merely to apply a recoil on Gibraltar, would there be anybody more stupid than the generals your armed forces produced. Anybody with a bit of basic military knowledge would laugh at such stupidity. I do not know what you people are taught or made to read in India, whatever it is, it does borders on the delusional.

Thats what you do when think strategically. Indians never intended to Capture Lahore or any Pakistani city, simple reason being both countries had Limited War Potential. Max of 12 Days. Now this is a fact and is obvious given our Defence Budget. It was obvious that once any war happen, within days International pressure let us get into ceasefire. So when ceasefire is the gospel truth in International Wars, why wud India focus on capturing a city when its gonna be returned after all wasting its resources just for Ego sake. As far as fake ego is concerned, India is completely opposite of Pakistan.

As per Indian strategy, War inside Pakistani territory will put Kashmir out of contention and Indias always knew that its a cakewalk to indulge Pakistanis inside their territory.

Why do you think Burki near Lahore is still in Punjab when it was already taken over?

Thats coz after ceasefire we have to vacate it.

Bottomline is, Wars are fought with future possibilities in mind. And any War with ceasefire as a future fact, is fought conseratively.