What's new

‘You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only,’ says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar

doublemaster

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
1,077
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
India
‘You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only,’ says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar | The Indian Express

Saying he would take “proactive steps” to meet any threat to the country, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar Thursday said “you have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only”.

To make his point, he quoted a Hindi saying “kaante se kaanta nikaalte hain” (you have to extract a thorn with a thorn) and said: “Why can’t we do it? We should do it. Why my soldier has to do it all the time?”

Responding to a question at Manthan Aaj Tak in New Delhi, Parrikar said: “If any country, why Pakistan, is planning something against my country, I will take proactive steps. Of course, not in the public domain. But what I have to do, I will do it. Whether it is diplomatic, whether it is pressure tactics or whether it is using the… woh usko bolte hain na Marathi mein kaante se kaanta nikaalte hain… Hindi mein bhi rahega… you have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only.”

He said this government is different from the previous one because it has given the Army a free hand to tackle terrorists through intelligence.

“Many attempts have been foiled and many neutralisations have taken place… if you see, recent incidents… Army knew about the hideout of the terrorists, they took them on at the place of their hiding… Security forces go by the guarantee of the government standing by them… and I can tell as a Defence Minister, I stand by the Army at any cost.”

He said the Army has been given standing instructions to shoot armed infiltrators, ensure minimum collateral damage and no loss of life of its own.

“Do not allow loss of life from our side. But take precautions that you do not make collateral damage… woh precaution lena hi hai (we have to take that precaution). You don’t touch civilians, unarmed. But if some one (is) with arms, shoot him… The instruction has a further line: do not allow loss of life from our side as far as possible. Use whatever equipment, people from our side,” he said, referring to incidents in which Army men have been killed while fighting terrorists.

He also spoke on the New Year day incident involving a Pakistani boat off Porbandar. “I took the flak (over the incident). I could have said that the Coast Guard may have done something wrong. No, they did not. I inquired everything, but I realised that they did not do anything wrong and followed the SOP (standard operating procedure). They should not be made to suffer. May be some people quoted Karachi sources. I am surprised. How can you …continued »


What a stupid thing to say...this is what happens if idiots get power.
 
‘You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only,’ says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar | The Indian Express

Saying he would take “proactive steps” to meet any threat to the country, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar Thursday said “you have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only”.

To make his point, he quoted a Hindi saying “kaante se kaanta nikaalte hain” (you have to extract a thorn with a thorn) and said: “Why can’t we do it? We should do it. Why my soldier has to do it all the time?”

Responding to a question at Manthan Aaj Tak in New Delhi, Parrikar said: “If any country, why Pakistan, is planning something against my country, I will take proactive steps. Of course, not in the public domain. But what I have to do, I will do it. Whether it is diplomatic, whether it is pressure tactics or whether it is using the… woh usko bolte hain na Marathi mein kaante se kaanta nikaalte hain… Hindi mein bhi rahega… you have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only.”

He said this government is different from the previous one because it has given the Army a free hand to tackle terrorists through intelligence.

“Many attempts have been foiled and many neutralisations have taken place… if you see, recent incidents… Army knew about the hideout of the terrorists, they took them on at the place of their hiding… Security forces go by the guarantee of the government standing by them… and I can tell as a Defence Minister, I stand by the Army at any cost.”

He said the Army has been given standing instructions to shoot armed infiltrators, ensure minimum collateral damage and no loss of life of its own.

“Do not allow loss of life from our side. But take precautions that you do not make collateral damage… woh precaution lena hi hai (we have to take that precaution). You don’t touch civilians, unarmed. But if some one (is) with arms, shoot him… The instruction has a further line: do not allow loss of life from our side as far as possible. Use whatever equipment, people from our side,” he said, referring to incidents in which Army men have been killed while fighting terrorists.

He also spoke on the New Year day incident involving a Pakistani boat off Porbandar. “I took the flak (over the incident). I could have said that the Coast Guard may have done something wrong. No, they did not. I inquired everything, but I realised that they did not do anything wrong and followed the SOP (standard operating procedure). They should not be made to suffer. May be some people quoted Karachi sources. I am surprised. How can you …continued »


What a stupid thing to say...this is what happens if idiots get power.
He said" kante ko kanta hi liklta hai" there infinite meanings of this phrase only the people who had hidden agenda will take it differently mostly pro-pak presstitudes
 
He said" kante ko kanta hi liklta hai" there infinite meanings of this phrase only the people who had hidden agenda will take it differently mostly pro-pak presstitudes

He said that quote in Hindi, and then he said "you have to neutralize terrorists through terrorists only" in ENGLISH.

He used a mixture of English and Hindi, but the main part of his statement was in English.

Read his FULL statement from the article:

Responding to a question at Manthan Aaj Tak in New Delhi, Parrikar said: “If any country, why Pakistan, is planning something against my country, I will take proactive steps. Of course, not in the public domain. But what I have to do, I will do it. Whether it is diplomatic, whether it is pressure tactics or whether it is using the… woh usko bolte hain na Marathi mein kaante se kaanta nikaalte hain… Hindi mein bhi rahega… you have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only.”
 
He said that quote in Hindi, and then he said "you have to neutralize terrorists through terrorists only" in ENGLISH.

He used a mixture of English and Hindi, but the main part of his statement was in English.

Read his full statement from the article:

Responding to a question at Manthan Aaj Tak in New Delhi, Parrikar said: “If any country, why Pakistan, is planning something against my country, I will take proactive steps. Of course, not in the public domain. But what I have to do, I will do it. Whether it is diplomatic, whether it is pressure tactics or whether it is using the… woh usko bolte hain na Marathi mein kaante se kaanta nikaalte hain… Hindi mein bhi rahega… you have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only.”

Look at the red part.......... If some one ask a Chinese Defence minister, the same what would be his reply? He will say no i will go with a white flag and beg him not to do such things?

Well I certainly agree, He should have been careful talking to Indian journalists, and better words could ahve been used....
 
Look at the red part.......... If some one ask a Chinese Defence minister, the same what would be his reply? He will say no i will go with a white flag and beg him not to do such things?

Well I certainly agree, He should have been careful talking to Indian journalists, and better words could ahve been used....

Thats Chanakaya Neeti and India following inside Kashmir since 1993, but definitely this time he meant we go inhouse (like Pakistan) and destroy the terrorist with terrorist, no journos able to grasp this.
 
Thats Chanakaya Neeti and India following inside Kashmir since 1993, but definitely this time he meant we go inhouse (like Pakistan) and destroy the terrorist with terrorist, no journos able to grasp this.

Indians are always accusing Pakistan of having a "good terrorist, bad terrorist" mentality.

So what's the difference?

The Indian defense minister is openly saying India will use terrorists to solve their problems.
 
Indians are always accusing Pakistan of having a "good terrorist, bad terrorist" mentality.

So what's the difference?

The Indian defense minister is openly saying India will use terrorists to solve their problems.
Nope he saying otherwise, if you use brain.

Since 1988, Pakistan was using terrorist card to force India to sit on negotiation table, that if talks fails then we start the tap of terrorist. Firstly, India want to neutralize that card. And even Chinese govt. know about this, and they never say a word about this. Because Chinese Govt. see itself on Indian side in long terms in this issue.

And remember one thing, since 2006 India saying Pakistan to destroy that terrorist infrastructure and dismantle Indian specified terror groups, but in last 10 years there were no progress, and still Pak finding a day where they can use this again against India.

What you think India is angel, that sit behind and just watch all the BS Pakistan is doing?
 
What you think India is angel, that sit behind and just watch all the BS Pakistan is doing?


But definitely this time he meant we go inhouse (like Pakistan) and destroy the terrorist with terrorist, no journos able to grasp this.

So you agree that you should use terrorists against terrorists?

Why would your Defense minister openly boast about sponsoring terrorists though?
 
So you agree that you should use terrorists against terrorists?

Why would your Defense minister openly boast about sponsoring terrorists though?

I really dont think that is what he was hinting...... I will give you an example...... The sim cards used by 26/11 attackers were provided by Indian agencies....... Now They cant go as a RAW agent and hand over those sim cards right?....... Hope you understand the context....
 
So you agree that you should use terrorists against terrorists?

Why would your Defense minister openly boast about sponsoring terrorists though?

What the problem in using terrorist in neutralizing terrorist?

If the Pakistan is failing to neutralize the Indian specified terror groups, then what are our options :-

1) We send Indian Forces, or surgical strike inside Pakistan, but thats not viable option in neutralizing the whole groups.

2) Or we hire mercenaries that act against these groups.

Even MOSSAD do this, even Indian Govt. doing this in J&K since 1993, they fund a group that act against terrorist groups. Whats the new story in this? You know very little about India Pak bro.
 
What the problem in using terrorist in neutralizing terrorist?

Because you guys are always saying it is wrong for Pakistan to separate good terrorists from bad terrorists, and if you keep snakes in your backyard they will bite you (or something similar).

Isn't that what you learned with the LTTE? That your own snakes will bite you?

And even if you guys never meant any of that stuff, why would your Defense minister boast of it openly, in English no less?
 
Excellent statement.

DM should put the words to action. Terrorists should be used to neutralize terrorists.
 
Because you guys are always saying it is wrong for Pakistan to separate good terrorists from bad terrorists, and if you keep snakes in your backyard they will bite you (or something similar).

Isn't that what you learned with the LTTE? That your own snakes will bite you?

And even if you guys never meant any of that stuff, why would your Defense minister boast of it openly, in English no less?

Facepalm, leave it, you never understand realpolitik.

One thing, in 2011 China started to give stapled visa to J&K people, but by 2012 the policy was like it never existed.

Why your govt. backstabbing your own most brotherly ally?
 
Because you guys are always saying it is wrong for Pakistan to separate good terrorists from bad terrorists, and if you keep snakes in your backyard they will bite you (or something similar).

Isn't that what you learned with the LTTE? That your own snakes will bite you?

And even if you guys never meant any of that stuff, why would your Defense minister boast of it openly, in English no less?

Even you guys accuse Pakistan of sponsoring terrorist
Xinjiang unrest: China blames unrest on Pakistan-trained terrorists - The Express Tribune
And for the defence minister's statement the India prostitute media will sell anything for TRP so take it with a pinch of salt when you hear something from presstitutes. I am not sure whether the indian prostitte media is twisting the defence minister words to show him in bad light
 
Excellent statement.

DM should put the words to action. Terrorists should be used to neutralize terrorists.

What the problem in using terrorist in neutralizing terrorist?

Despite Beijing bonhomie, China blocks India move for UN ban on Salahuddin: Officials - The Hindu

In retaliation does it serve any purpose for India in "stalling" Chinese UN moves on Xinjaing militants?

See, this is why we don't take you seriously when you complain that China is blocking India from listing Pakistani citizens as terrorists in the UNSC sanctions committee.

You guys are literally drooling at the prospect of using terrorists yourselves.

And all that stuff you say about good terrorists bad terrorists, and snakes in your backyard will bite you, was all complete and utter BS.

Looks like you learned nothing from your experience supporting the LTTE.

Such hypocrisy, you're always lecturing others on terrorists while your Defense minister is openly boasting of using terrorists.

@Horus see how they boast about this.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom