Wokay, ladies and gentleman. I opened my computer today to see about a 100 alerts. I don't have time to go through them all today as I have some work to do , unlike you lazy people wasting your whole day and night on the forum...so here are some answers I wanted to do individually, but will do in bulk.
1. "Yogi "MAY" do development work , prove that he won't" - ans, when you employ someone you look at their resume. So far yogis resume has been pure and simple rabble rousing. If he had any interest in development , we would have seen it in his constituency. So far a big zero. Cannot compare to Modi, who had 11% growth in his state. This is like employing an accountant who has never kept books on the premise that there is no evidence that he cannot do the job!
But HAVE you looked at his Resume ?
1. From 8 am to 10 am each morning, Yogi Adityanath, tends to his constituency and meet people and resolve issues EVERYDAY.
In 1999, Yogi Adityanath won Gorakhpur by the margin of 7,339 votes; 10 years later in 2009, he Won the election with a winning margin of 2,20,000 votes.
You think people will vote for him with such increasing margin if he has done Nothing for them ? He is a 5 times MP. What does that tell you ?
2. A MP in UP can spend Rs 5 crore per year on their constituency under the MP Local Area Development Scheme. That's it. What kind of "development" is possible with that kind of paltry fund ?
The UP state govt. has a budget of Rs 221,201 crore. So who is responsible for "development" ?
So if you want to truly "measure" development, Look at his WINNING MARGIN which has kept on Increasing EVERY YEAR. In my book that is the true measure of his ability to provide service to the public.
3. "This is democracy, the party chose" - in a democracy people get to chose their leaders "people's wish" . If the party had been so sure of the people s wish, they would have campaigned with yogi as the face but inst. ead they campaigned with Modi as the face and switched from development to Hindutva . So basically they were mis- using the rules of parliamentary democracy. Technically within the letter of the law but not the spirit. I think in a country like India we need electoral reform. What worked on a tiny homogeneous island like Britain, is not working for us .
BJP Never claimed Yogi Adityanath would not be the CM either. Most polls showed him as the leading leader from BJP and most possible candidate for CM. So its not as if the public was not aware of his becoming CM. Yet they choose to trust Modi's judgement.
As a matter of fact making the most popular leader as the CM IS obeying the letter of the Law AND Spirit. Having a "high command" install a "leader" is the true violation of everything a democracy stands for. One needs to give up sch elitist attitudes and bad habits one has picked up during "secular" CONgress rule.
Electoral reforms is a whole different matter and I agree with you on that. But this is a poor example to provide for making your case for such a reform. This is an example of things going right for a change. Not someone's SON installed as CM.
5. And about that stupid picture of yogi giving a gift to a woman in burka - my only response would be this is exactly like that famous racist politician in the US who once said "BUT I have black friends and I even let them use my bathroom! ". Pfft ....secular my @ss.
That "stupid picture" is a Reality, irrespective of what ever one claims. Its not a Fake.
That is all that matters.
One is free to draw any conclusion biased on one own bias and prejudice. But make sure you continue to know the difference between a Fact and an Opinion.