Your own minister says that from the 1950's every election has been rigged in kashmir......thats why the armed freedom struggle took place......pakistan was only to happy to help.
There is a misconception in india that pakistan started the kashmir liberation......india gave the spark and pakistan poured the petrol.
The Biharis see themseves as indian the kashmiris do not.......the kashmiris took to the gun to defend there country.
The UN says that kashmir is not part of india.....Nehru said he would let the people of kashmir choose what they wanted to do..........did nehru or the UN give the same deal to the bihari's..?
I am sure the topic of the legalese of Kashmir has been discussed to death. I don't have anything to add to that. India may have done some follies, I don't deny that.
The UN resolutions are 60 years old and have proved unworkable. There is no point in playing the same broken record. Even Pakistani government no longer keeps harping on that.
Most people in India consider it a mistake by Nehru to take the issue to the UN. He should have allowed the IA to finish the job in 1948.
The liberation infrastructure will stay in place until india forfills its obligations on kashmir.
Pakistan has offered a hundred and one solutions on kashmir to the indians.....you rejected all of them.
The fight will continue until the indian govt starts making concrete concessions.
Again obviously we are on opposite sides here and have opposite views of who is to blame for the Kashmiri's plight. I don't know which solution you are talking about, but any solution that talks of changes in border is obviously unacceptable. You can't win on the table what you failed to do on the battleground.
I think it is the declared policy of India that there is no limit to the autonomy Kashmir can have. Also there was the great proposal by Musharraf to make borders irrelevant without changing them. That could be the direction of the final solution.
The "international community" has not raised a single finger on the kashmir issue in the last 60 years so why would we be bothered about what they have to say............did this same "international community" force india to accept the UN resoultions......no
You have to depend on yourself and your friends.
You have to bother because Pakistan needs the support of the international community and wants to be a respectable member of it. Its not possible while you are supporting terror in Kashmir at the same time. It has been proved that the same groups also target the Western interests all across the world.
Again the situation that you face is much altered now. India is in a much better position militarily, economically and diplomatically to deal with the situation. IA has much better equipment and a much better intelligence network in Kashmir.
Earlier some of your "think tank" used to claim that India won't be able to sustain the economic burden once it's army crosses the 500,000 in Kashmir. You have been harping on 700,000 numbers for years and India seems to be doing just fine economically. In fact it was never better.
Why don't you understand that Kashmir has just a very small % of the Muslim population of India. If 150 million plus Muslims can live in India, so can the few million in Kashmir. They run the state themselves damn it. India will never allow another religion based division of the country. NEVER.
Why don't you allow Balochistan to secede. Don't give me the UN and disputed shyt. It is basically about the nation's determination not to allow few piffling separatists and a hostile neighbor to succeed in breaking up the country. And we don't use Air force on our people in Kashmir as Pakistan does without compunctions without a care for innocents dying as collateral damage. This even at the cost of more casualties.