vish
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2008
- Messages
- 867
- Reaction score
- 0
Really! Look who's talking, just because you don't give a hoot does'nt mean the we don't either. And as for what we want, don't come up with BS if you have nothing positive to add, Unlike you guys who always claim Kashmir to be your part, we on the other hand don't and that is exactly why when we talk about Kashmir that includes AJK as well and not JK alone. Should'nt this be enough to throw your accusation out of the window.
All the three state actors (India, Pakistan, PRC) have not abided by the UN's resolutions. Why do you talk only about Kashmir? Is Kashmir the only thing in conttention? What about Aksai Chin, Laddakh, Jammu, Leh, "Northern Areas," and the tract of land you "leased" to the PRC? Isn't Northern Areas a part of Pakistan? Why make a hue and cry about Kashmir, or to be more specific, its Valley? Atleast India has been non-hypocrytical: we want the erstwhile princely state of J&K completely. What has Pakistan done: created a farce in the name of an "independant" Kashmir and incorporated Northern Areas into itself. What has PRC done: made it clear that it won't cede any territory. Why should India respect UN resolutions when Pakistan and China don't?
I would say give it up, other then a force full occupation you guys have nothing to put claims on to this territory. Kashmir is a disputed territory and that stands for all parts of it which needs to be addressed.
The Indian side of J&K is our territory; you want the dispute to remain alive to suit your agenda. Pakistan wants to incorporate Kashmir. This is the dispute: you want what we have.
And by the way if Kashmir is a disputed territory in the UN, that means it is for the real world as well. I wonder which world are you talking about, maybe Mars
In the real world, the Indian side of J&K is de facto Indian territory.