Deino
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 12,780
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
It shall you be the one defending your stance when on WZ-10 when a whole batch of new one fitted with new EO line up outside the factory. While your ridiculous assessment of them being just refurbished is just sound so out of line.
WS-20 will eventually evolved into even civilian engine series for C919.
WS-18 with D-30KP2 almost similiar and faster induction rate will no doubt solved the Y-20 urgent need w/o waiting for WS-20 engines.
its up to u to trust the Chinese forum source. Isn't the divine eagle started initial source also came from Chinese forum? Now it become reality with initial flight and photo.
You are indeed funny … either You simply can’t argue or You don’t want to argue or – and that’s what so far is my conclusion – You simply have no clue, You have no proof other than links in some Chinese fora that simply fits Your opinion. Everything else is bashed down as anti-Chinese-propaganda, based on stupid or unreliable or anti-Chinese sources. But that’s not the way to discuss … Even more why should be a Pakistani-Forum more reliable than a Chinese one even if run in English ??
Sorry, but if I remember correctly in all controversial discussions we both had so far it is always this way:
- WS-10 on J-20: You say it is a WS-10, even a WS-10G without giving a source, a link, no photographic proof or at least an argument that would assist Your claim, nothing. I in return explained that I’m not sure, that however all my observations, all external details and also many reports – and there are many widely different ones around – give a hint that it is an AL-31FN … but You only tell my sources are wrong, unreliable or stupid without giving any sources on Your own.
- WZ-16 on Z-10: You say it is a WZ-16 (+ new sensors) without giving a source, a link, no photographic proof or at least an argument that would assist Your claim, nothing. I in return explained that I’m not sure, that however all my observations, all external details and also many reports – and there are many widely different ones around – give a hint that these are actually only refurbished pre-serials (even the serials number 1014 is another hint !). You not even give an argument why after a new fuselage was designed they returned back to the old heavier one. And by the way it’s not a whole batch there are only a few and these have not even an operational LH-serial. … but You only tell my sources are wrong, unreliable or stupid without giving any sources on Your own.
- WS-18 suitable for that What-if transport: You argue that beast has better aerodynamics, that the WS-18 is a vastly modernized and improved engine and not a mere D-60KP … but You simply ignore that an old design with only roughly half the required thrust to propel such a 90t-cargo-capacity monster transport (to remind that is about 3/2 the amount the Y-20 is to carry) could use the same engines especially if more modern ones are already on the horizon ? … simply forget it.
But hey, it’s o.k. we are all free to have our own opinion if You want to stick in Your dream-world as a fan-boy it’s o.k. …. But don’t expect anyone to take You seriously anymore.
Have a nice day,
Deino
Last edited: