TankMan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 3,213
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
The roller-coaster part was a joke, I do agree with 'gradual modernization' or a system like the one you're talking about as long as its cost-effective and does what it's supposed to.It's not about roller-coaster ride, but cost effectiveness. Some place may be rocky (harder to dig) or have enough room to make flyover. Or the train/bus can make use of land instead, assuming there is free room for it.
It really isn't like that. The people who don't have hospitals live outside the city. The metro is for people in the city to travel to other parts of the city. The way it is now it caters more towards students and people who need to travel within the city itself - not those who live outside the city and don't have hospitals.The poor and the needy can get to better Hospitals and get care, something they may not be able to get before. And this expands the Healthcare.
Case in point, a map of the Metro Bus route and a Map of hospitals in the area
Metro Bus route:
Hospitals in the area:
Yeah, it does take years to build. Problem is that the politicians treat people like idiots with all their nonsense about ending loadshedding in three months or six months. Obviously people are going to be disappointed and pissed when it's the same after two years.We are solving our energy problem. We can't fix it in one day.
Nuclear, dams which produce cheap electricity, take years to build. Metro project can be done in span of year or two.
It doesn't help that the government keeps contradicting the World Bank and their facts:
Govt to resolve load shedding issue within three years: Kh Asif
Load shedding in Pakistan unlikely to end by 2018: WB
NEPRA's facts aren't very encouraging either:
Loadshedding won't end by 2020: Nepra - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
All that compared to their election promises:
Promises of Shahbaz Sharif of Ending Loadshedding