What's new

Women condition in India worse than Pakistan and Bangladesh: United Nations

Riyad

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 30, 2015
Messages
1,525
Reaction score
-5
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
More gender inequality in India than Pakistan, Bangladesh: United Nations
Among South Asian countries, India fares better than only Afghanistan which is at 152.


Written by Shalini Nair | New Delhi | Updated: December 15, 2015 7:56 am
gender.jpg


India is placed 130 out of 188 on the Human Development Index (HDI) with Bangladesh at 142 and Pakistan at 147.
India ranks 130 out of 155 countries in the Gender Inequality Index (GII) for 2014, way behind Bangladesh and Pakistan that rank 111 and 121 respectively, according to data in the United National Development Programme’s latest Human Development Report (HDR) 2015.


Among South Asian countries, India fares better than only Afghanistan which is at 152.



The index captures inequalities in gender-specific indicators: reproductive health measured by maternal mortality ratio and adolescent birth rates, empowerment quantified by share of parliamentary seats and attainment in education, and economic activity measured by labour market participation rate.



Pakistan and Bangladesh have a lower Human Development Index (HDI) than India and yet perform better on gender equality as measured by GII. India is placed 130 out of 188 on the Human Development Index (HDI) with Bangladesh at 142 and Pakistan at 147.



But with respect to each parameter on the gender index, India lags behind both its neighbours. Consider this:



* Merely 12.2 per cent of parliamentary seats are held by women in India as against 19.7 in Pakistan and 20 in Bangladesh.



* India is also beset with a high maternal mortality rate of 190 deaths per 100,000 live births as compared to 170 pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 births in both Bangladesh and Pakistan.



* In percentage of women receiving secondary education, Bangladesh at 34 per cent far outperforms India at 27 per cent.



* On labour force participation rate for women, Bangladesh is at 57 per cent, India is at 27 per cent.



* In all the above indexes, India’s performance is way below the South Asian average.



The only parameter where India fares slightly better is the adolescent birth rate, which is the number of births per 1000 women aged 15 to 19 years. A lower adolescent birth rate indicates a female population that is more in control of its choices when it comes to marrying and conceiving late.



On this scale, India’s figures are much better than that of Bangladesh as well as the South Asian average, though Pakistan’s record is marginally better than India’s.



UNDP officials state that over the last couple of years, India’s GII values have improved slightly from 0.61 to 0.563. This is mainly due to improvements in maternal mortality rate and women’s representation in parliaments in this period though other indicators have remained stagnant.



The HDR 2015, which is focused on the issue of work, also documents a global drop in female labour force participation rate, which is the proportion of working-age population in paid employment or looking for paid work. “This is owing mainly to the steep reduction for India, from 35 per cent women in 1990 to 27 per cent in 2013, and China from 73 per cent to 64 per cent in the same period,” said Yuri Afanasiev, UNDP resident representative in India.



According to Renana Jhabwala, national coordinator, Self-Employed Women’s Association, women’s workforce participation, by virtue of its invisibility, is largely under-counted in much of the government surveys.



“For instance, these surveys fail to capture details on large number of women in agriculture since land is in the name of the man. Due to this invisibility in official data, such women are often bereft of benefits such loans or seeds which the land-holding men are eligible for. This creates in India what we call a ‘sticky floor’ situation where a majority of women cannot rise above a certain level of earnings, skills and benefits. It is the opposite of the what the West refers to as ‘glass ceiling’,” said Jhabwala.


More gender inequality in India than Pakistan, Bangladesh: United Nations | The Indian Express
 
.
So you're telling me that women are worst off in the worlds "largest democracy", AKA the so called "rising shupaar powaar", AKA "shining" india??

Meanwhile women are faring better in the "failed mullah state" of Pakistan?? This can't be! I smell bias against "shupaar powaar" india by the UN.

@Chinese-Dragon @persona_non_grata @Hiptullha @Akheilos @Shamain
 
.
More gender inequality in India than Pakistan, Bangladesh: United Nations
Among South Asian countries, India fares better than only Afghanistan which is at 152.


Written by Shalini Nair | New Delhi | Updated: December 15, 2015 7:56 am
gender.jpg


India is placed 130 out of 188 on the Human Development Index (HDI) with Bangladesh at 142 and Pakistan at 147.

India ranks 130 out of 155 countries in the Gender Inequality Index (GII) for 2014, way behind Bangladesh and Pakistan that rank 111 and 121 respectively, according to data in the United National Development Programme’s latest Human Development Report (HDR) 2015.


Among South Asian countries, India fares better than only Afghanistan which is at 152.


The index captures inequalities in gender-specific indicators: reproductive health measured by maternal mortality ratio and adolescent birth rates, empowerment quantified by share of parliamentary seats and attainment in education, and economic activity measured by labour market participation rate.


Pakistan and Bangladesh have a lower Human Development Index (HDI) than India and yet perform better on gender equality as measured by GII. India is placed 130 out of 188 on the Human Development Index (HDI) with Bangladesh at 142 and Pakistan at 147.


But with respect to each parameter on the gender index, India lags behind both its neighbours. Consider this:


* Merely 12.2 per cent of parliamentary seats are held by women in India as against 19.7 in Pakistan and 20 in Bangladesh.


* India is also beset with a high maternal mortality rate of 190 deaths per 100,000 live births as compared to 170 pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 births in both Bangladesh and Pakistan.


* In percentage of women receiving secondary education, Bangladesh at 34 per cent far outperforms India at 27 per cent.


* On labour force participation rate for women, Bangladesh is at 57 per cent, India is at 27 per cent.


* In all the above indexes, India’s performance is way below the South Asian average.


The only parameter where India fares slightly better is the adolescent birth rate, which is the number of births per 1000 women aged 15 to 19 years. A lower adolescent birth rate indicates a female population that is more in control of its choices when it comes to marrying and conceiving late.


On this scale, India’s figures are much better than that of Bangladesh as well as the South Asian average, though Pakistan’s record is marginally better than India’s.


UNDP officials state that over the last couple of years, India’s GII values have improved slightly from 0.61 to 0.563. This is mainly due to improvements in maternal mortality rate and women’s representation in parliaments in this period though other indicators have remained stagnant.


The HDR 2015, which is focused on the issue of work, also documents a global drop in female labour force participation rate, which is the proportion of working-age population in paid employment or looking for paid work. “This is owing mainly to the steep reduction for India, from 35 per cent women in 1990 to 27 per cent in 2013, and China from 73 per cent to 64 per cent in the same period,” said Yuri Afanasiev, UNDP resident representative in India.


According to Renana Jhabwala, national coordinator, Self-Employed Women’s Association, women’s workforce participation, by virtue of its invisibility, is largely under-counted in much of the government surveys.


“For instance, these surveys fail to capture details on large number of women in agriculture since land is in the name of the man. Due to this invisibility in official data, such women are often bereft of benefits such loans or seeds which the land-holding men are eligible for. This creates in India what we call a ‘sticky floor’ situation where a majority of women cannot rise above a certain level of earnings, skills and benefits. It is the opposite of the what the West refers to as ‘glass ceiling’,” said Jhabwala.

More gender inequality in India than Pakistan, Bangladesh: United Nations | The Indian Express

Central & South Asia

Indian Defence Forum
Discussions related to Indian military build up, military developments, defence technology. NO INDIAN STRATEGIC AFFAIRS



Source: Indian Defence Forum
 
. .
So you're telling me that women are worst off in the worlds "largest democracy", AKA the so called "rising shupaar powaar", AKA "shining" india??

Meanwhile women are faring better in the "failed mullah state" of Pakistan?? This can't be! I smell bias against "shupaar powaar" india by the UN.

@Chinese-Dragon @persona_non_grata @Hiptullha @Akheilos @Shamain

No, the report is telling that conditions of human beings are worst in Pakistan, much worse than even in Bangladesh.

The report mentions lower participation of women in parliament as a reason of lower ranking, but ignores the fact that 50% of the seats at the municipal and panchayati level are reserved for women.
 
.
Kudos to Bangladesh. She did a great job in improving women's education.
 
. . . .
What can you expect from a warmongering nation which feeds its military complex more than her bhooka nanga desh waasi.

Jai hind.:usflag:

Indian response should be something like, United nation can move its offices to Pakistan now
Or
UN is a terrorist organization & Bankimoon is Hafiz Saeed's brother in law.
 
. .
HDI is the main index....it shows overall development....women specific Indices are flawed due to many reasons.....
for ex., women have more power and rights than men in India, the gender-inequality is probably against men....
 
Last edited:
.
The report mentions lower participation of women in parliament as a reason of lower ranking, but ignores the fact that 50% of the seats at the municipal and panchayati level are reserved for women.

Reservations mean nothing. Indians have reservations for lower-castes too, but that doesn't prevent them from being forced to pick up the defecation of the local street Brahmin.
 
.
HDI is the main index....it shows overall development....women specific Indices are flawed due to many reasons.....
for ex., women have more power and rights than men in India, the gender-inequality is probably against men....
Bwahahahahaha
:rofl:
 
.
Please don't blame Indians for this now a days they are quite busy in Cow protection can't divert their attentions to save their women or improve their condition.
We will be happy to improve their condition, all they have to do is come across the border :lol::lol: but then and again no thanks:rofl::rofl:
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom