What's new

Woman claiming to be Colonel's wife abuses police

Sadly there are lots of paindoos who become civ/mil officers(afsars) and then act like whole of Pakistan is their pind.

A lot of army officers are often harrassed by similar paindoo zameendars
Wow. Then we are blamed if we point to the law within the law.
If an Army Colonel wife can behave like this, imagine what the Generals wives could be like.

She should be put in to prison, and her husband should be court martial if he try to interfere.
Oh boy, how many laws she has broken in 10 mins!!
How this behaviour is allowed to continued, why she was not arrested immediately by the Police!!

 
.
No idea what you're talking about.

My comments remain restricted to the case in question. I've offered my views, you can disagree if you want.

You want an institution to react for a non liable person just for perception.

I gave you an example how there is active abuse of power by the PM house in Auqaaf department.

There is no thread about NAB investigating the minister of religious affairs for nepotism.

We both agree on Do Nahi Ek Pakistan.

So if ISPR is apologising, i would request an apology from PM house as well
 
.
You want an institution to react for a non liable person just for perception.
If the reputation of the institution is being damaged, then yes, I would like to see the damage minimized. Whether the institution agrees with me and chooses to do so or not is their call.
I gave you an example how there is active abuse of power by the PM house in Auqaaf department.
You gave me a claim. I have no clue as to the veracity of this claim so therefore I cannot use said claim as an example of anything.
There is no thread about NAB investigating the minister of religious affairs for nepotism.
Then create one using a proper source and following the rules of the forum. Who's stopping you?
We both agree on Do Nahi Ek Pakistan.
True for every society - not sure what the relevance is here
So if ISPR is apologising, i would request an apology from PM house as well
For what? I don't see the PM house as having done anything they need to apologize for.
 
.
If the reputation of the institution is being damaged, then yes, I would like to see the damage minimized. Whether the institution chooses to do so or not is their call.
the reputation of the institute is not built upon one woman's lack of understanding how the world turns.

where is social distancing and masks and etc etc?

why drag army into it when its a case of one frustrated citizen
Who's stopping you?
you.
how many of my anti government anti PM post do you delete in a day?
For what? I don't see the PM house as having done anything they need to apologize for.

its because media does not report it or is asked not to do so.

i can post them videos and reports and will you come between me and the abuse i get for questioning the pharoah?
 
. . . .
Someone didn’t receive enough chittar when they were young. Or received one too many. I personally know a ‘colonels wife’ - disgraceful two face woman she is. They actually refer to non army people as ‘civilians’ as if its a degrading term. Men who actually do the job are disciplined and respectful but their beghamaat, feel they are privileged cause they don’t even have to do anything, not even house chores, thanks to the batmen, paid by tax payer.
 
.
If someone from your family murders (supposedly) someone .....Should you be hanged for his crime.... simply because he is your family?
No, but can you imagine the fierce behavior of this woman without the support of her husband? This must not have been the first time she did this, look at her confidence. If you want to look the other way just because she is from Army then Go for it.
 
.
Waisay if Ispr apologises or forces this woman to apologise it would only increase izat of institution.

I have read many times at PDF if it was in US police would have them dead. Why police in US kills people for small things? I think 5 minute ka liya murgha banana is more than enough.

When you set a precedence of people going over your head you lose the writ to maintain authority; and it has to be established so others in the future know to act within a certain limit established by law.

We have many cases in the US police and security shooting US Army soldiers and officers as well, because law is uniform no matter your standing, we have State Attorney Generals pulled over for speeding tickets, etc.

When you let one person walk over you, and a 2nd comes along walks over you when will it stop?
 
. . .
Do they shoot people for these small things? If it's true it means police in US is very incompetent they can not control the situation without the use of guns

If this happened in the US it's a possibility she would have been shot.

Reason being when your stopped you are to remain in your vehicle at all times, unless directed by the officer to get out with hands in certain position and everything clearly visible.

The way she got out, an officer would consider it a threat to his/her safety and pull out the gun, and the law gives the officer full right to do it. The way she's acting would be considered erratic, which would have given her the privilege of a bullet in her gand.

We've seen people running away being shot by police.
 
.
No, but can you imagine the fierce behavior of this woman without the support of her husband? This must not have been the first time she did this, look at her confidence. If you want to look the other way just because she is from Army then Go for it.

Also take a look at her son, who seemed quite sheepish and embarrassed.

If this was a regular occurrence, he would probably be a lot more used to it and would have either joined in or at least not been uncomfortable with the whole situation.

If this happened in the US it's a possibility she would have been shot.

Reason being when your stopped you are to remain in your vehicle at all times, unless direct by the officer to get out with hands in certain positions and everything clearly visible.

The way she got out, an officer would consider it a threat to his/her safety and pull out the gun, and the law gives the officer full right to do it.
And then everyone and their chacha would be screaming 'police brutality'.

PTM can go mob a security checkpoint in an area where terrorism is still a danger and check points are set up to handle terrorism, but any kind of a SOP response similar to that by most US police departments would be considered 'Army brutality against innocent Pashtun'.

Just imagine if that had been a US Army checkpost in Afghanistan or Iraq with a mob approaching.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom