Where is it written in constitution that India is a Hindu country?
It need not be, by default it goes by the Majority. That's is the whole reason Muslims fought for a new country, got Pkaistan and BD.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is it written in constitution that India is a Hindu country?
What a joke? Go to Nepal it's a Hindu country.It need not be, by default it goes by the Majority.
What a joke? Go to Nepal it's a Hindu country.
We are already 35% going to be majority soon.
We are 350 million+ easily. Census will keep foolinf you. Our figures are under-reported delibrately to fool you Hindbadis.Keep dreaming. Increase 20% of population in your dreams. LOL
We are 350 million+ easily. Census will keep foolinf you. Our figures are under-reported delibrately to fool you Hindbadis.
Fake surveys and studies don't mean anything. I have live in 5 states and I know the truth. Even educated Muslims in cities have atleast 4 children. In rural areas it's more than double that figure.Biggest population states like, TN, Andhra, Maharstra, Karnataka, Gujarath, MP,Orissa, Punjab,Haryana etc etc.. they are in 5 to 10% range max. UP and Bhihar they are 17% 18%.
By all estimates in by 2030, they will reach 18%.
Fake surveys and studies don't mean anything. I have live in 5 states and I know the truth. Even educated Muslims in cities have atleast 4 children. In rural areas it's more than double that figure.
Sitting in USA, you don't anything about the ground realities.
Fake surveys and studies don't mean anything. I have live in 5 states and I know the truth. Even educated Muslims in cities have atleast 4 children. In rural areas it's more than double that figure
Here is the link to the Supreme Court ruling of 2013, revising the "Representation of People act", which subsequently made it mandatory to fill every column:
http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=40768
The judgement was delivered in 2013, because of a writ petition filed in 2008. Obviously, it cannot be applied retrospectively.
mughal created india... lol..You should leave and apply for Nepali passport. Mughals created India. There was no India before Muslim rulers.
May be he is offend the RP act but but what if he given false information remember no one can able to prove that that he is married or not.unlike many false leader like Sonia-Rahul who offended the RP acts repeatedly I like to assure you RP act is just tool that every politician nowdays violates just show me one leader gone to jail in violation of RP ActJudgement neither turns down any section nor advocates further provisions in RP act. It is observing an act which is already in place so whether can it applied retrospectively or not is totally out of the question, reread points 21,22 and 23. Perjurers are guilty under section 125 A of RP act which is already in situ. Please refer to the verdict of Ahmedabad court passed just a weak and half ago (a year after the SC judgement) the judge clearly has ruled that Modi sahib has offended section 125(A)(3) of RP act by not disclosing facts about his marital status while filing his nomination form in 2012 elections. The court however binned the plea citing it was late, for plea should be filed within one year as per CrPC section 468(2)(B). The judge wouldn't have found Modi sahib offender of RP act if the SC verdict had barred him from applying its judgement retrospectively.
Modi marital status case: offence committed but FIR cannot be filed now
Thanks for the link anyway.