'Without Patel, Hyderabad would not have merged with India'

[Lord ZeN]

Both had their jobs. Both did well in what they were tasked to do.

Since uniting India politically was Patel's responsibility - I am lauding him for amazing work done.

Eventually, had he not decided to 'meet swords with swords', Nizam might have succeeded in getting an independent country or at best a dominion.

The partition of our country was wrongly executed by Congress ( aka Gandhi-Nehru dynasty party) ... The Congress should have voted for a united country, then we should have partitioned the Muslim majority areas on our own terms ...That way we could have forced all the so called kingdoms into India & also could have retained entire J&K + could have made 3 muslim nations (Pak ,BD, Balochistan )

 

[SarthakGanguly]

That way we could have force all the so called kingdoms into India & also could have retained entire J&K + could have made 3 muslim nations (Pak ,BD, Balochistan )

We can still do that sometime in the future. Hell, two third is already done. Once India becomes a developed nation we can focus our energies in other areas on a greater priority.

 

[Judge]

The partition of our country was wrongly executed by Congress ( aka Gandhi-Nehru dynasty party) ... The Congress should have voted for a united country, then we should have partitioned the Muslim majority areas on our own terms ...That way we could have force all the so called kingdoms into India & also could have retained entire J&K + could have made 3 muslim nations (Pak ,BD, Balochistan )

In the end it turned out okay.
If we had made even 2 Muslim nations in the first place then the real agenda of Pakistanis would not have come out.

That Bangladeshis found out the imperialistic and feudal tendencies of Pakistan towards Bangladeshis on their own makes it better in the long term. Now they have a real live example of what happens when an entire country becomes Islamist. Now they know what to guard against. And Bangladesh is far more important to India than Pakistan.

 

[janon]

Your Hindutva sarkar is doing what Pakistan could have never done. There is no need to send support, things will emerge from within. Let terrorist-turned Modi complete his term.

At the end of Modi's term, in five years (or more if the BJP is re-elected), if nothing of the sort happens - Hyderabad and all other "occupied states" are all still part of India, will you change your viewpoint? Would you be willing to explore the possibility that you are wrong about Modi and the present Indian govt?

This is the same question I ask to certain religious nutjobs I meet in the US. (Some muslims, but mostly baptist christians.) I'm talking about the ones who really, passionately believe (or used to, after Obama's first election) that Obama is the antichrist and the prophesied end of the world is near. I would ask them that if at the end of four or eight years, Obama leaves office and goes into retirement, and another person gets elected into the oval office, but the world is still here and the end times hadn't come, would they then be willing to accept the possibility that they were wrong, and that Obama is not the antichrist? They were completely smug in telling me that such a possibility doesn't arise.

Unfortunately I'm not in touch with them anymore, so I don't know how they have re-interpreted reality to suit their worldview.

 

[temp1994]

Also; No Kashmir.

Rediff On The NeT: An interview with Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw

'Jawaharlal, do you want Kashmir,
or do you want to give it away?'

As usual Nehru talked about the United Nations, Russia, Africa, God almighty, everybody, until Sardar Patel lost his temper. He said, 'Jawaharlal, do you want Kashmir, or do you want to give it away'. He (Nehru) said,' Of course, I want Kashmir (emphasis in original). Then he (Patel) said 'Please give your orders'. And before he could say anything Sardar Patel turned to me and said, 'You have got your orders'.

Account of Field Marshall Sam Manekshaw.

 

[INDIC]

Just another Indian occupied state besides Junagadh, Manavadar, and Kashmir. Those who talk about plebiscite in Kashmir need to look at Indian leader's track record. No wonder India supports apartheid Israel.

Hyderabad was so malamaal that it even made Pakistan forget two nation theory and territorial contiguity and tried to get Hindu majority areas at any cost.

 

[temp1994]

A testament of Nehru-Patel relations.

When I was back in Delhi Sardar insisted that I should call on Jawaharlal Nehru as a matter of courtesy. When I went to the Prime Minister’s office in Parliament House, he came out in the ante-room and frigidly accosted me: “Hello Munshi”. “I have come to call on you, now that I am back in Delhi,” I said. He almost turned as if to go; then he turned round, shook hands with me and left.

I told Sardar how sorry I was to have accepted his advice to see Jawaharlal Nehru. Sardar laughed and said: “Some of them are angry that you helped in liquidating the Ittehad power. Some others are angry that you did not allow them to remove the Nizam from Hyderabad straightway. Some cannot vent their anger on me, and therefore make you the target.”

Times Of India | Blogs

Account of K M Munshi.

 

[INDIC]

Your Hindutva sarkar is doing what Pakistan could have never done. There is no need to send support, things will emerge from within. Let terrorist-turned Modi complete his term.

Evil Hindus didn't allow Hindu majority Junagadh and Hyderabad going into Pakistan who were even ready to forget two nation theory for that. 'Pot calling the Kettle Black' or "grapes are sour', you choose one.

 

[ExtraOdinary]

Would have been even better if all the Razakar force members had been deported, evil SOB's

 

[Lord ZeN]

Hyderabad was so malamaal that it even made Pakistan forget two nation theory and territorial contiguity and tried to get Hindu majority areas at any cost.

They got Karachi .. It was a Hindu majority City..

 

[temp1994]

Would have been even better if all the Razakar force members had been deported, evil SOB's

Certainly.

It is one thing to not deport muslims en-mass in wake of formation of Pakistan. It is another one to not deport those who fired on you.

This shortsightedness has turned Hyderabad city into Pakistani enclave.

 

[ashish1]

Just another Indian occupied state besides Junagadh, Manavadar, and Kashmir. Those who talk about plebiscite in Kashmir need to look at Indian leader's track record. No wonder India supports apartheid Israel.

Hyderabaad would have been a failed city infested with terrorists roaming on streets if it had joined Pakistan but instead it joined India and now is the IT hub amd one of the most devloped cities of South Asia.
Hyderabaadis are proud of there decision.

 

[chand ch]

If patel was given full powers there would be no Azad Kashmir like there were no Junaghad and Hyderabad state in India.He was not given powers by Nehru and some British officers (continued till India became a republic) because they thought there would be religion riots in India(temporary) but they lacked their foresight which caused Kasmir conflict (No solution according to UN).ONCE AGAIN I THANK MODI FOR REMEMBERING THE NATION ABOUT OUR IRON MAN SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL. JAI HIND...........

 

[Parul]

Your Hindutva sarkar is doing what Pakistan could have never done. There is no need to send support, things will emerge from within. Let terrorist-turned Modi complete his term.

For Pakistani's everyone other than them is a Terrorist.

Hinduphob, get well soon. May Allah Cure your Illness.

 

[Lord ZeN]

Hyderabaad would have been a failed city infested with terrorists roaming on streets if it had joined Pakistan but instead it joined India and now is the IT hub amd one of the most devloped cities of South Asia.
Hyderabaadis are proud of there decision.

How can it join Pak .... 80% of population of State of Hyderabad were Hindu ...