What's new

Winning the 2018 elections with Zardari & PPP, or saving his party’s ideology – what will Imran do

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Welcome to Pakistan
Winning the 2018 elections with Zardari and PPP, or saving his party’s ideology – what will Imran Khan choose?
By Raza Habib Raja Published: March 25, 2018
0SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
65203-razacoverjpg-1521885284-322-640x480.jpg

The only way to prevent the PML-N from making government after the 2018 elections is through an alliance between the PPP and the PTI.

The election, or as some experts satirically call it, the “selection” of the relatively unknown candidate as the Chairman of the Senate, has jolted the political landscape of Pakistan. It is now clear that those who removed Nawaz Sharif – right or wrong is a different matter altogether – are going to use all the tactics at their disposal to prevent his political comeback.

The objective in the Senate election has been achieved brilliantly by both, the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). They have been brought together in a surprising alliance, despite Imran Khan’s tall public promises of never shaking hands with “corrupt” politicians like Asif Ali Zardari.

All politics is realpolitik – based on pragmatism – which is why, in principle, one should not be surprised by such developments. The reality is that politics is the art of compromise, and to some extent, political parties all over the world display pragmatism by compromising on ideology.


Despite this, the alliance is not a small development, as it has “united” two extreme foes, giving us a peek into the political landscape of the future as well.

Frankly, this “alliance” may very well become a permanent template for the future, because the reality is that despite Nawaz’s disqualification, he remains popular in Punjab. I understand this is hard to grasp for the corruption-obsessed, urban, white-collar class, but clearly there is an obvious contradiction between what they think, and what the rest of the country thinks.

Since Nawaz’s disqualification, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has won all the by-elections, including Lodhran, which was supposedly a safe seat for the PTI. One could argue some of these victories were in rural areas, where politics is extremely local, and therefore, such wins do not reflect the national sentiment. Some assert that these victories do not prove Nawaz’s popularity has increased after the verdict. True, these victories do not show his increased appeal, but at the same time, they do reflect that despite its leader’s disqualification, the PML-N is still strongly entrenched at the local level in rural areas as well.

Moreover, in the urban areas, there are signs that Nawaz’s narrative of “mujhe kyun nikala” (why was I ousted?) is actually gaining traction. His rallies are getting bigger, and the party’s base seems to be more charged than usual.

Given the aforementioned scenario, it will be difficult to completely demolish the PML-N in the upcoming elections, even if Nawaz is put behind bars, and so-called “electable” candidates are persuaded to leave the party. Unless and until massive rigging or engineering (such as breaking up the PML-N into factions) is done, the party is still likely to emerge with the most number of seats, though probably short of simple majority.

If this does happen, the only way to prevent the PML-N from making government is through an alliance between the PPP and the PTI.

Both parties will have to come together once again, and there are two ways of going about this. The first is to announce an outright alliance, and fight elections on the basis of seat adjustment. However, the problem with this method is that it is going to be very difficult for Imran to justify such an alliance. His core support base constitutes of the urban, white collar class who hate the PPP, particularly Zardari. Thus, an open electoral alliance will demotivate his followers.

Moreover, the PPP is no longer an electoral force, the way it once used to be. Outside rural Sindh, the party’s prowess has completely evaporated. In the 2013 elections, out of a total of 297 seats, the PPP could only win six in the Punjab Assembly. In the recent by-elections as well, the PPP fared extremely poorly, and was not even able to cross the threshold of 5,000 votes. Ultimately, there is nothing the PTI is going to achieve out of such an alliance.

The second way is to engineer the kind of alliance witnessed during the Senate elections. Although feasible, the problem is that in the Senate elections, both the PPP and the PTI were in an “indirect” alliance, supporting an independent candidate. The stakes were also not as high, as in the Pakistani context, the Senate is not as important as the National Assembly. However, a post-election alliance will have to be more direct, and both parties may have to divide ministries between them, while also agreeing on a mutually acceptable prime minister.

For the PTI, the only acceptable person for the job will be Imran, and they will also be reluctant to give important ministries to the PPP. In this scenario, the PPP can support the PTI government from the outside, but such a government would be extremely weak, as it would give rise to a lot of political uncertainty and possible instability.

If the parties have to come to an alliance after the elections, then Imran will have to show flexibility and offer the PPP a substantial share in power. After all, given the chaos under this administration, a hung parliament with an unstable government is not something Pakistan can afford.


0 CommentsPrintEmail
on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook
raza-habib.jpg

Raza Habib Raja
The author is a recent Cornell graduate and currently pursuing his PhD in political science at Maxwell School, Syracuse University. He has also worked for a leading development finance institution in Pakistan. He is a freelance journalist whose works have been published at Huffington Post, Dawn (Pakistan), Express Tribune (Pakistan) and Pak Tea House. He tweets @razaraja (twitter.com/razaraja?lang=en)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.
 
.
he can sell his respect and soul to the devil if it gets him an election seat
 
.
he can sell his respect and soul to the devil if it gets him an election seat
Problem isn’t make alliance the problem is who gonna PM and who president. in current constitution the president is a showpiece and keep in mind that Zardari was president when he has his own party’s PM, or change the 18th amendment. A lot funny days ahead.
 
. .
Disappointing. In such an event I would rather cast my vote to ppp.
 
.
for pm.seat he will do everything
And who else not doing any thing to get seat ? you should try to read the history again janab..changa manga, establishment k through parliamentarians ki khareedari. dictator k sath NRO karny waly kon begairat they?
 
.
And who else not doing any thing to get seat ? you should try to read the history again janab..changa manga, establishment k through parliamentarians ki khareedari. dictator k sath NRO karny waly kon begairat they?
that is what my point is alway
 
.
ik will bring no change.ppp will most likely to win next election like they did in senate.ik totally loser in senate.ppp has deputy chairman and opposition leader and chairman is also of zardari choice but ik fails even to get opposition leader in senate.he is tissue paper being used by establishment and zardari and zardari called him a dog by saying to hunt lion you have to make alliance with dogs
 
.
Yes, this is exactly what would be tried, to achieve similar to what happened in senate. N-league will emerge biggest party but not with simple majority. Baluchistan is not in their hands, Karachi will benefit a little bit to both ppp and pti, punjab n-league ministers would be broken up in the last days, Punjab seats have decreased as compared to other provinces, all of theses factors will allow zardari to play his jor tor in alliance with establishment and pti.
 
.
Welcome to Pakistan
Winning the 2018 elections with Zardari and PPP, or saving his party’s ideology – what will Imran Khan choose?
By Raza Habib Raja Published: March 25, 2018
0SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
65203-razacoverjpg-1521885284-322-640x480.jpg

The only way to prevent the PML-N from making government after the 2018 elections is through an alliance between the PPP and the PTI.

The election, or as some experts satirically call it, the “selection” of the relatively unknown candidate as the Chairman of the Senate, has jolted the political landscape of Pakistan. It is now clear that those who removed Nawaz Sharif – right or wrong is a different matter altogether – are going to use all the tactics at their disposal to prevent his political comeback.

The objective in the Senate election has been achieved brilliantly by both, the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). They have been brought together in a surprising alliance, despite Imran Khan’s tall public promises of never shaking hands with “corrupt” politicians like Asif Ali Zardari.

All politics is realpolitik – based on pragmatism – which is why, in principle, one should not be surprised by such developments. The reality is that politics is the art of compromise, and to some extent, political parties all over the world display pragmatism by compromising on ideology.


Despite this, the alliance is not a small development, as it has “united” two extreme foes, giving us a peek into the political landscape of the future as well.

Frankly, this “alliance” may very well become a permanent template for the future, because the reality is that despite Nawaz’s disqualification, he remains popular in Punjab. I understand this is hard to grasp for the corruption-obsessed, urban, white-collar class, but clearly there is an obvious contradiction between what they think, and what the rest of the country thinks.

Since Nawaz’s disqualification, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has won all the by-elections, including Lodhran, which was supposedly a safe seat for the PTI. One could argue some of these victories were in rural areas, where politics is extremely local, and therefore, such wins do not reflect the national sentiment. Some assert that these victories do not prove Nawaz’s popularity has increased after the verdict. True, these victories do not show his increased appeal, but at the same time, they do reflect that despite its leader’s disqualification, the PML-N is still strongly entrenched at the local level in rural areas as well.

Moreover, in the urban areas, there are signs that Nawaz’s narrative of “mujhe kyun nikala” (why was I ousted?) is actually gaining traction. His rallies are getting bigger, and the party’s base seems to be more charged than usual.

Given the aforementioned scenario, it will be difficult to completely demolish the PML-N in the upcoming elections, even if Nawaz is put behind bars, and so-called “electable” candidates are persuaded to leave the party. Unless and until massive rigging or engineering (such as breaking up the PML-N into factions) is done, the party is still likely to emerge with the most number of seats, though probably short of simple majority.

If this does happen, the only way to prevent the PML-N from making government is through an alliance between the PPP and the PTI.

Both parties will have to come together once again, and there are two ways of going about this. The first is to announce an outright alliance, and fight elections on the basis of seat adjustment. However, the problem with this method is that it is going to be very difficult for Imran to justify such an alliance. His core support base constitutes of the urban, white collar class who hate the PPP, particularly Zardari. Thus, an open electoral alliance will demotivate his followers.

Moreover, the PPP is no longer an electoral force, the way it once used to be. Outside rural Sindh, the party’s prowess has completely evaporated. In the 2013 elections, out of a total of 297 seats, the PPP could only win six in the Punjab Assembly. In the recent by-elections as well, the PPP fared extremely poorly, and was not even able to cross the threshold of 5,000 votes. Ultimately, there is nothing the PTI is going to achieve out of such an alliance.

The second way is to engineer the kind of alliance witnessed during the Senate elections. Although feasible, the problem is that in the Senate elections, both the PPP and the PTI were in an “indirect” alliance, supporting an independent candidate. The stakes were also not as high, as in the Pakistani context, the Senate is not as important as the National Assembly. However, a post-election alliance will have to be more direct, and both parties may have to divide ministries between them, while also agreeing on a mutually acceptable prime minister.

For the PTI, the only acceptable person for the job will be Imran, and they will also be reluctant to give important ministries to the PPP. In this scenario, the PPP can support the PTI government from the outside, but such a government would be extremely weak, as it would give rise to a lot of political uncertainty and possible instability.

If the parties have to come to an alliance after the elections, then Imran will have to show flexibility and offer the PPP a substantial share in power. After all, given the chaos under this administration, a hung parliament with an unstable government is not something Pakistan can afford.


0 CommentsPrintEmail
on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook
raza-habib.jpg

Raza Habib Raja
The author is a recent Cornell graduate and currently pursuing his PhD in political science at Maxwell School, Syracuse University. He has also worked for a leading development finance institution in Pakistan. He is a freelance journalist whose works have been published at Huffington Post, Dawn (Pakistan), Express Tribune (Pakistan) and Pak Tea House. He tweets @razaraja (twitter.com/razaraja?lang=en)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.
Very good post,
Both options are quite interesting
But in my humble opinion the next general elections will take place on 2020 rather than 2018......
If the GE will take place on 2018 than the chances of a simple majority for any party are rare
The option of Export a leader from abroad is also open ...........

ik will bring no change.ppp will most likely to win next election like they did in senate.ik totally loser in senate.ppp has deputy chairman and opposition leader and chairman is also of zardari choice but ik fails even to get opposition leader in senate.he is tissue paper being used by establishment and zardari and zardari called him a dog by saying to hunt lion you have to make alliance with dogs
Agr PPP ny hi jeetna hai to phir hmain sharam sy doub marna chahiye
 
.
that is what my point is alway
Janab humain pata ha k khan sb ko kon la raha ha kesy la raha ha. bus usko any so 50 sall sa 2 he partion k THOBRY daikh daikh kar kom ki ankhain kharab ho gai hain. hahaa
 
.

THis is for PPP supporters.......... watch and enjoy your leader's speech
 
.
Winning the 2018 elections with Zardari and PPP, or saving his party’s ideology – what will Imran Khan choose?
Imran will do what he has done in senate elections, will obey the orders of boss.
 
. .
Andho mai kana rajaa..

PMLN dubara Iqtidaar mai Aany k lia US mai Mr.Ambassador k zariye Aari choti ka zoor laga rhi hai. Or pakistan ko mazeed pasti mai dakhelny ki pori taiyari mai hai. International firms hire ki jarhi hain narrative build karny k lia

Exclusive: Hacking Democracy – Cambridge Analytica Turns to Pakistan

Or waha PTI or PPP. Senate election kiya jeet liye.. Khowab dekh rhy hain langri loori hakomaat banay ka

Senate constition ki dhajiya bekhair kr rakh di gae hain k ab angotha chaap bhi ab crore rupees laga kr ticket lekar senate ka hissa ban chuka hai. Or koe pochny wala nhi k jaidad kesy banae hai..

@RiazHaq Sahab koe Good news bhi hai hm jesy pakistaniyo k lia ya nhi ?
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom