What's new

Winning chance against China is zero, according to Japanese war simulation

Status
Not open for further replies.

52051

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
2,245
Reaction score
-11
Country
China
Location
China
Recently Japanese admirals conduct internal military excerise and simulation to evalulate the outcome of a possible skirmish with China in East China sea.

The conclusion is the Japanese airforce may hold the line for a few hours to a few days before lost all their fighters to China, they believe Chinese airforce enjoy a significant number and quanlity advantage, and their pilots are at least as good as the Japanese ones.

The Japanese are more confident in their navy, believe if China dont use their antiship ballastic missiles from rocket force, then there is 30% of the chance the japanese navy can defeat Chinese navy in east China sea, however if China use their antiship ballastic missiles, the winning chance will reduce to zero.

Such simulation is under the assumption of current military balance, and under the assumption that US force wont come to rescue.

With such results, the Japanese defence force call for deepen cooperation with US force stationed in Japan and warn against operation without US's support, and acceralation the purchasement of F-35.


http://a.mp.uc.cn/article.html?uc_p...fa9698&wm_id=cd0e20e74d55400f8bf7ce7bf0c00c8b

This is consistent with an earlier article published on Foregin Policy, the US think tank believe without US intereven the Japanese will lose to PLA in 5 days, and the think tank suggest the US should not interenve such skirimish if it is not invloved in PLA invade Japan mainland.

http://www.guancha.cn/military-affairs/2016_01_28_349599_s.shtml
 
.
Recently Japanese admirals conduct internal military excerise and simulation to evalulate the outcome of a possible skirmish with China in East China sea.

The conclusion is the Japanese airforce may hold the line for a few hours to a few days before lost all their fighters to China, they believe Chinese airforce enjoy a significant number and quanlity advantage, and their pilots are at least as good as the Japanese ones.

The Japanese are more confident in their navy, believe if China dont use their antiship ballastic missiles from rocket force, then there is 30% of the chance the japanese navy can defeat Chinese navy in east China sea, however if China use their antiship ballastic missiles, the winning chance will reduce to zero.

Such simulation is under the assumption of current military balance, and under the assumption that US force wont come to rescue.

With such results, the Japanese defence force call for deepen cooperation with US force stationed in Japan and warn against operation without US's support, and acceralation the purchasement of F-35.


http://a.mp.uc.cn/article.html?uc_p...fa9698&wm_id=cd0e20e74d55400f8bf7ce7bf0c00c8b

This is consistent with an earlier article published on Foregin Policy, the US think tank believe without US intereven the Japanese will lose to PLA in 5 days, and the think tank suggest the US should not interenve such skirimish if it is not invloved in PLA invade Japan mainland.

http://www.guancha.cn/military-affairs/2016_01_28_349599_s.shtml
Once we get our own aircraf engines, they will be in deeper ship. Imagine we can produce the aircraft inland and we have so many naval shipyards, we can outproduce them.
 
.
It's not wise for Japan to take an antagonistic line against China. in the end of the day all East Asians will come down to their common Confucius roots and shared cultures and values. It is in the blood.
 
. .
China's H-20 will be a very useful weapon to bomb japan.

The reason why both PLAN and PLAAF are only interested in twin engine heavy weight stealth fighters are such fighters with superior range can helping PLA dominate the air over Tokyo and ensure the PLA airborne and bomber squad conduct their mission with indisputable air superiority.:enjoy:
 
.
China's H-20 will be a very useful weapon to bomb japan.

The reason why both PLAN and PLAAF are only interested in twin engine heavy weight stealth fighters are such fighters with superior range can helping PLA dominate the air over Tokyo and ensure the PLA airborne and bomber squad conduct their mission with indisputable air superiority.:enjoy:

yes any jets must be able to reach until 北海道 and any S.bombers must be able to reach 关岛
 
. . .
China's H-20 will be a very useful weapon to bomb japan.

The reason why both PLAN and PLAAF are only interested in twin engine heavy weight stealth fighters are such fighters with superior range can helping PLA dominate the air over Tokyo and ensure the PLA airborne and bomber squad conduct their mission with indisputable air superiority.:enjoy:

If india will sell LR SAM to Japan, None of their aircraft or cruise missile come closer that 100 KM. They will be shot down with 100% kill accuracy.
 
.
If india will sell LR SAM to Japan, None of their aircraft or cruise missile come closer that 100 KM. They will be shot down with 100% kill accuracy.

One can only hope Japanese could be this dumb:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Indian missile:
a79d48655e53a79d.jpg
 
.
If india will sell LR SAM to Japan, None of their aircraft or cruise missile come closer that 100 KM. They will be shot down with 100% kill accuracy.
:taz::taz::taz::taz::taz:i was waiting when some INDIAN comment, and say when we get this that, or when we do this indian will be destroyed...basrani bjany waly larna kya jany:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
LRSAM And Brahmos will doom china. Equations will take U turn when Japan will get F35.
 
.
Winning a war is not always an objective, funny you may think or say, but there are winning with few casualty, and there are winning with yourself suffer high casualty rate. The question is not whether or not China can win a war with Japan, but rather how much China willing to give to win a war with Japan.

Imperial Japan have no chance of winning a war with the US in WW2, but that does not mean they will just give up without a fight, we all see what happen to US trying to fight an island hopping campaign with Japan, if China want a war with Japan, the Chinese need to be willing to pay what US paid during WW2, and in todays term, probably more. That is the question the Chinese government need to ask themselves before asking for a war with Japan.
 
Last edited:
.
Recently Japanese admirals conduct internal military excerise and simulation to evalulate the outcome of a possible skirmish with China in East China sea.

The conclusion is the Japanese airforce may hold the line for a few hours to a few days before lost all their fighters to China, they believe Chinese airforce enjoy a significant number and quanlity advantage, and their pilots are at least as good as the Japanese ones.

The Japanese are more confident in their navy, believe if China dont use their antiship ballastic missiles from rocket force, then there is 30% of the chance the japanese navy can defeat Chinese navy in east China sea, however if China use their antiship ballastic missiles, the winning chance will reduce to zero.

Such simulation is under the assumption of current military balance, and under the assumption that US force wont come to rescue.

With such results, the Japanese defence force call for deepen cooperation with US force stationed in Japan and warn against operation without US's support, and acceralation the purchasement of F-35.


http://a.mp.uc.cn/article.html?uc_p...fa9698&wm_id=cd0e20e74d55400f8bf7ce7bf0c00c8b

This is consistent with an earlier article published on Foregin Policy, the US think tank believe without US intereven the Japanese will lose to PLA in 5 days, and the think tank suggest the US should not interenve such skirimish if it is not invloved in PLA invade Japan mainland.

http://www.guancha.cn/military-affairs/2016_01_28_349599_s.shtml

Even USAF simulation has predicted the same results in SCS, they can't hold the ground for long.........
 
.
Last edited:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom