The Accountant
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
I think its not his call ... Armed forces are managing it within their own budget ... This is a continuous process ...
Modernization should be planned with a purpose of dual-use i.e. research that has both commercial and military uses ...
What the new government will do about Pakistani nuclear arsenal?
It does need an upgrade, specially in response to steadily improving Indian ABM capabilities.
Ababeel MIRV needs a new engine. Currently it is using the same engines as Shaheen-3 uses, making it slow to rise and vulnerable to enemy ABM capabilities.
Warheads need to be improved in design, to reduce size and weight while keeping or improving the blast yield.
Above all we do need to be brave enough to test our missiles as necessary. India does it all the time, we are too scared to do so.
Agreed, except for one part, that we do not need to modernize ... We should keep on modernizing as the process should not be stopped however, range needs to be up to farther parts of India at max ...That is our mistake. The US is a large colonial power(if you think the US doesn’t have colonies, see the number of US bases around the world). In addition, basic military might tells you that the US has overwhelming conventional capabilities and its nuclear arsenals are beyond anything we can comprehend. Finally, we also need to understand that the US doesn’t just manipulate our society and threaten us with consequences; it just did so and has done so to its closest allies ik NATO.
But the US isn’t the only one playing manipulation on our soil, the British do it, the French do it, the entire GCC does, the Iranians do.. are we going to call all of them enemies?
The UAE proactively tried to disrupt gwadar and supposedly tried to offer India accommodation against us, shall we nuke them too?
There is only one government and nation with nuclear weapons targeted at our country and that is India.
That is the only target we have to focus on. There is no threat from the US in terms of nuclear capability and we actually keep them well at bay because we target their interests in India.
The only other possibility of engagement is from Israel who ammased weapons to take out their neighborhood in case their limited lands were insufficient as in 73. But since they have pacified all of the threats around them to the point that their former enemies now participate in exersizes on their soil.
Our mistake with the US was considering that you control them by dealing with their various governments. The Indians tried that until they realized the Israeli approach of dealing with their political and media stakeholders. There is no prophetic conspiracy with the Israelis, the US pays for Israel because zionists control both the media and finances of the country along with partipating actively in their politics and bureaucratic system. Add to that their version of right wing fundamentalists and you get control of a country.
We hate the US because we fear them : in reality it is similar. Half of their population lives in fear of outside threats.
The US has interests in keeping the Chinese contained via India, as long as we threaten India, we threaten the United States and keep them at bay.
Despite all their bluster the Indians have zero hope of defending themselves against even our oldest of nuclear delivery systems simply because we arent thousands of miles away but site next door. They need nothing short of science fiction to protect themselves from our attack.
The only threat that makes USA pounce is Israel, and An ICBM lets them justify that.
On the other hand, the Indians know you, understand your language and experience your beliefs first hand and yet chose to hate you blindly. The reason is that hate is pure and unbridled, it is venom of centuries that they want to unload on you. Yet we have made multitudes of peace overtures that they hypocritically blame us for sabotaging.
Our enemy is clear until they put their weapons away.
We have no need to modernize beyond what is already in motion.
Our focus now should be internal because that is where the war is.
Modernization should be planned with a purpose of dual-use i.e. research that has both commercial and military uses ...