What's new

Will Pakistan become the 3rd largest nuclear power in the World?

600 million poor with no sanitation , houses , clean water and slums disagree with you .

No.

I already said, Its a Tough Job ( Harder than Producing Nukes ) and we are working over it. Infact the money spent on Toilets ( $20 Billion ) is Three Times your Defence Budget !

they are not facing each other and shooting at each other at borders, neither one wants anahilate the other form the face of this earth.

Really ?

If that was the Standard ("Shooting Bullets" and "Sharing Borders"), ColdWar wasnothing to worry about !

Facts :
http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/09/13/hostile-neighbors-china-vs-japan/
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201608151044298455-china-japan-conflict-prospects/
 
How many enemies do Japan and Germany have ?Zero . Pakistan faces an enemy that is 4 times bigger in area and 7 times bigger in population . It has to do everything in order to keep the balance alive . Especially with an enemy who has fought 4 wars with you .
Are you sure about that??
 
im going to get allot of hate for this but whats the point being the 3rd biggest nuclear power when the economy isn't even in the top 30, it means nothing for the citizens, its just show piece.
Iran doesn't have much militarily compared to Pak, they don't have active nuclear stockpiles, they have outdated weapons systems which date back from the 60s, there under severe economic sanctions, yet the government is investing in society trying to improve it, the US and israel have stated they'll launch airstrikes on them for over a decade yet nothing has been susbtantiated from there threats. I'd say even with there shortcomings there doing better then Pakistan.
 
We have a bigger enemy with false belief that it's bigger size would provide an edge in nuclear exchange. We are only trying to reach the number that would enable annihilation of every major city/town two times over.

that would mean pakistan going ahead of china ? ...as i think usa and russia are top two in terms of the number of warheads ?
 
Japan & Germany dont have Nukes. Arnt they Better than Pakistan ( & India ) ?
Tody the real Power and True Progress of a Nation lies within :

- Economy
- Science
- Living Standard of its Citizens
Yes true if you are under the US nuclear umbrella like Japan and Germany!
 
We have a bigger enemy with false belief that it's bigger size would provide an edge in nuclear exchange. We are only trying to reach the number that would enable annihilation of every major city/town two times over.
There are over 60 cities with more than a million people in India and the combined population of those cities is around 200 - 250 million so we must aim for more cities including medium to large cities with a population of 0.4 to .6 million as well so that no terrorist minister of India can claim that India will lose 100 - 200 million people only but Pakistan will be done...no sir you are mistaken ..... we shall decimate each and every of your cities and towns and kill upwards of 600 million in direct strikes while the rest will die painfully cooked in radiations and chaos. Not a single inch of India will be liveable for decades to come..so think again before you threaten us with nuclear war.

That means no Hinduism and even if entire Pakistan goes away, still 1.5 billion people around the world will still be Muslims and our caravan will continue
 
Last edited:
How can people, Indians in this thread be so hypocrites, while they will defend to the death why Usrael keeps 400 nuclear warheads or maybe more and India has a stockpile of Plutonium to make 2000 nuclear devices plus all the Enriched Uranium that exist and more to come trough the US exception for India in the nuclear fuel field?
 
It already is!!!! so now Pakistan should focus more on structure and the basic needs of its citizens
 
It already is!!!! so now Pakistan should focus more on structure and the basic needs of its citizens
Bro,

Both things need to go hand in hand and one shouldn't be sacrificed for the sake of the other and furthermore, it is not the defence but the corruption that is plaguing Pakistan's economy so you need to focus on elimination of the corruption which is ruling supreme in Pakistan under the current corrupt regime.

A thoughtful quotation of the Israeli PM Golda Meir when she was criticised and was cornered by the opposition for signing a very expensive defence deal with USA when Israel’s economy was in shambles, she said “I learned this from the Prophet of Islam (Muhammad (ﷺ)) that when he died, he did not had anything to eat in home but he had nine swords hanging on the walls of his home, The history does not remember how many eggs and how much butter was available for breakfast, but it remembers how powerful the country was and how it defended itself”

84 million toast in approx. 45 devices


Mumbai - 16m
Kolkata - 13m
Delhi - 13m
Chennai - 6m
Bnagalore - 6m
Hyderabad - 5m
Ahmedabad - 5m
Pune - 4m
Surat - 3m
Kanpur - 3m
Jaipur - 2m
Lucknow - 2m
Nagpur - 2m
Patna - 2m
Indore - 2m
But 84 million is nothing since Indian idiot minister has said that it is not big issue if they loose 100-200 million people if they can destroy Pakistan in response.
So we have to aim for around 500 to 600 million people at least for a deterrence.
 
Last edited:
Bro,

Both things need to go hand in hand and one shouldn't be sacrificed for the sake of the other and furthermore, it is not the defence but the corruption that is plaguing Pakistan's economy so you need to focus on elimination of the corruption which is ruling supreme in Pakistan under the current corrupt regime.

A thoughtful quotation of the Israeli PM Golda Meir when she was criticised and put agains the wall by the opposition for signing a very expensive defence deal with USA when Israel’s economy was in shambles, she said “I learned this from the Prophet of Islam (Muhammad (ﷺ)) that when he died, he did not had anything to eat in home but he had nine swords hanging on the walls of his home, The history does not remember how many eggs and how much butter was available for breakfast, but it remembers who powerful the country was and how it defended itself”


But 84 million is nothing since Indian idiot minister has said that it is not big issue if they loose 100-200 million people if they can destroy Pakistan in response.
So we have to aim for around 500 to 600 million people at least for a deterrence.

Those are just 15 cities with 15 warheads. We have 200 or more warheads. they'd be lucky with half the population down the tubes cuz 200 warheads would easily take out all 1.3 billion of them two times over.
 
no problem, hit their food basket with ground impact weapons, take out all the dams and leadership and the country would split along ethnic lines itself.

Bro,

Both things need to go hand in hand and one shouldn't be sacrificed for the sake of the other and furthermore, it is not the defence but the corruption that is plaguing Pakistan's economy so you need to focus on elimination of the corruption which is ruling supreme in Pakistan under the current corrupt regime.

A thoughtful quotation of the Israeli PM Golda Meir when she was criticised and put agains the wall by the opposition for signing a very expensive defence deal with USA when Israel’s economy was in shambles, she said “I learned this from the Prophet of Islam (Muhammad (ﷺ)) that when he died, he did not had anything to eat in home but he had nine swords hanging on the walls of his home, The history does not remember how many eggs and how much butter was available for breakfast, but it remembers who powerful the country was and how it defended itself”


But 84 million is nothing since Indian idiot minister has said that it is not big issue if they loose 100-200 million people if they can destroy Pakistan in response.
So we have to aim for around 500 to 600 million people at least for a deterrence.
 
Back
Top Bottom