What's new

Will India join USA to strike China?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, there would be no war involving weaponry.
Cyber war is on and US already helping India in that.

Welcome to the China defense forum Barack Obama :lol: (sorry, just feel a bit weird to address you in that name :D).

Would you mind show the readers here some facts/insider information on your statement so we can all learn something interesting?

thx
 
.
This is why I prefer to be an Indian rather than a Chinese. We don't have such rapid development like them, but at least we have FREEDOM.

Indian and White American have FREEDOM to split China.

Chinese has NO FREEDOM to split India and USA.


This is your logic :)
 
.
rofl ok so whats your point? the fact is, china doesn't have slums, india does; china doesn't have starvation, india does; china has less arable land and a higher population; india does far worse on all measures of a successful society.

low caste indians have the slave mentality, thats why they can't get used to it. indian culture is similar to that of Qing Dynasty china, at least 90 years behind the times.

no, actually they have the same mentality as the minorities of china who r day by day crushed by hans chinese,is that enough or want more stories

low class indians r slave,how do u know that,u asked them or they told u

or u also sayed in some hotel in india and when a waiter respected u,and u started to felling like a master and the waiter as a slave just like an another chinese was portyaying here
 
.
no, actually they have the same mentality as the minorities of china who r day by day crushed by hans chinese,is that enough or want more stories

low class indians r slave,how do u know that,u asked them or they told u

or u also sayed in some hotel in india and when a waiter respected u,and u started to felling like a master and the waiter as a slave just like an another chinese was portyaying here

i wouldn't know, all the indians i've met are rich high class indians.
 
.
Indian and White American have FREEDOM to split China.

Chinese has NO FREEDOM to split India and USA.


This is your logic :)

Ulta chor kotwal ko dantee....

India does not wanna split china....india has alreaddy mention that tiet is the part of china.... You want our region of Arunachal Pradesh
 
.
The Pentagon mouthpiece has invited India to join USA in its economic fight against China.



Obviously, the mouthpiece tried its best to legitimize the USA's arbitrary declaration of trade war against China portraying China's moves which are related to China's sovereignty in a negative manner so that readers would easily be convinced that US is right to trespass sovereignty.

Will Indians join the Britons?


sir, economic fight will be healtheir for both the countries.
But , i didnt know how it is about striking China?:hitwall:
 
.
The river of history carves a scar on the Indians and the Chinese, but it sounds like more on the Indians, as China at least nominally won that conflict. The scar, and any scar, needs medication and time to heal.

In the history, while Mr. Nehru shouting Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai, he was at the same time backstabbing China by forwarding into China’s traditional territory. He was betting that China, just finished the bloodiest conflict since WWII in Korea with USA and its allies, would not retaliate the “only friend” but swallow the encroachment by India. But he was proven wrong. He and his followers don’t know China. Actually, they perhaps know more western world than eastern world.

India’s very imperialistic behaviour also had helped consolidate the friendship to an unprecedent degree between once wary neighbors: Pakistan and China. Frankly speaking, in that sense, India functions precisely as a crazy glue to keep Pakistan and China together and tight. For those nurturing sour-grape mentality towards the friendship, you have to look back into the history and figure out what your precedent politicians/media had done and current politicians/media are doing, and simply stop whining.

Today, Sino-India business is booming, and this should be a good medication to improve the relationship and to heal the scar. Unfortunately, again, some belligerent Indian politicians, for their own interest, find ways to derail the development of India. They call this weapon China specific and that doctrine aimed as China enemy number one. Have we heard that from China? No! The only unofficial article from China is in response to Indian media.

While it is happy to see so many Indians in this thread are so sane that they want a peaceful relationship between India and China, one can’t help but remember there is a lot amount of Internet Indians who can’t seal their glee when talking about Japan’s devastation of China. Why? They conveniently forget that it is China that had shielded India from Japan’s invasion! They should be thankful to the Chinese!

A peaceful Sino-India relationship is a win-win to both. A hostile relationship is a loss-loss to both, but more so to India than to China.
 
. . .
no, actually they have the same mentality as the minorities of china who r day by day crushed by hans chinese,is that enough or want more stories

^^ I see Times of India is doing its job pretty well - Doesn't it hold Tabloid Newspaper Award of the year, every single year from 1962 to 2009? :smokin:
 
.
The river of history carves a scar on the Indians and the Chinese, but it sounds like more on the Indians, as China at least nominally won that conflict. The scar, and any scar, needs medication and time to heal.

In the history, while Mr. Nehru shouting Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai, he was at the same time backstabbing China by forwarding into China’s traditional territory. He was betting that China, just finished the bloodiest conflict since WWII in Korea with USA and its allies, would not retaliate the “only friend” but swallow the encroachment by India. But he was proven wrong. He and his followers don’t know China. Actually, they perhaps know more western world than eastern world.

India’s very imperialistic behaviour also had helped consolidate the friendship to an unprecedent degree between once wary neighbors: Pakistan and China. Frankly speaking, in that sense, India functions precisely as a crazy glue to keep Pakistan and China together and tight. For those nurturing sour-grape mentality towards the friendship, you have to look back into the history and figure out what your precedent politicians/media had done and current politicians/media are doing, and simply stop whining.

Today, Sino-India business is booming, and this should be a good medication to improve the relationship and to heal the scar. Unfortunately, again, some belligerent Indian politicians, for their own interest, find ways to derail the development of India. They call this weapon China specific and that doctrine aimed as China enemy number one. Have we heard that from China? No! The only unofficial article from China is in response to Indian media.

While it is happy to see so many Indians in this thread are so sane that they want a peaceful relationship between India and China, one can’t help but remember there is a lot amount of Internet Indians who can’t seal their glee when talking about Japan’s devastation of China. Why? They conveniently forget that it is China that had shielded India from Japan’s invasion! They should be thankful to the Chinese!

A peaceful Sino-India relationship is a win-win to both. A hostile relationship is a loss-loss to both, but more so to India than to China.

First of all the thread title is so misleading that for a moment I thought China was being attacked by US-India. Phew!

Secondly, gpit, you seriously need to come out of the US flag you are hiding into. Use your own country flag, and if that shames you, you can use an Indian flag.

Thirdly, India and China can only grow more economically strong by working together. China is more advanced militarily, why the hell is China then not attacking India and taking back Arunachal Pradesh which they claim as their land. This is because Chinese Govt (sane people who are in Chinese Govt.) does not think like most of us think in here, in this forum and also a war between China and India will not be decisive until it goes nuclear, in which no one actually would win.

And Indian Govt too thinks the same way. I am not the official voice of GoI, but trade figures in Billions of $ would justify my case.

So we have more to gain going together than going alone. But if US can prove the Yuan conspiracy, then I guess all options should be kept open.

Thank You.
 
.
^^ I must let you know that "our" is a very BIG assumption according to Int'l Law .:agree:

Which Internation law prohibit indian people to have the right on their own land ???
Which international law prohibited Indian people to call their motherland India(including arunachal) their own land??
Which International law declared Arunacal a disputed territory ???


Mind you..Arunachal is not Tibet
Arunacalis consider themself indians and are indian while in tibet people are against chinese government..i think you forgot when in 2008 tibetian modified your Olympic slogan to "One World One Dream FREE TIBET"
here i googled for you

one world one dream free tibet - Google Search
 
.
^^^ :blah: :tdown:

Don't be ridiculous!

Go check any internationally recognised World Atlas and related UN sites, as both are backed up rigorously by related Int'l Laws, to see which colour is South Tibet. :agree:
 
.
Which Internation law prohibit indian people to have the right on their own land ???
Which international law prohibited Indian people to call their motherland India(including arunachal) their own land??
Which International law declared Arunacal a disputed territory ???


Mind you..Arunachal is not Tibet
Arunacalis consider themself indians and are indian while in tibet people are against chinese government..i think you forgot when in 2008 tibetian modified your Olympic slogan to "One World One Dream FREE TIBET"
here i googled for you

one world one dream free tibet - Google Search

Lolzzzzz dear if people are discussing it in the I'm Okay- You are not Okay senario it makes it disputed.... and whenever it comes to disputed areas ... letting the people of the land decide about their future is the best option. No one needs a law [or any law in that case] to determine their own destiny. :cheers:
 
.
<China is more advanced militarily, why the hell is China then not attacking India and taking back Arunachal Pradesh which they claim as their land. This is because Chinese Govt (sane people who are in Chinese Govt.) does not think like most of us think in here, in this forum>

This is absolutely true. China could have gotten back Hong Kong and Macau way before 1997 and 1999 respectively if China decided to take military action. This is also go with Taiwan which will eventually be united with China.

<and also a war between China and India will not be decisive until it goes nuclear, in which no one actually would win.>
I do not recommend India to ever launch a nuclear weapon on China. China would prefer using conventional weapons. In fact, China suggested the world declared nuclear powers to rid of nuclear weapons. Of course, France and UK would not like this idea because then they will be toothless.

I think the biggest mistake that China made during the Sino-India war was for China to move back its troops to the MacMahon Line unilaterally after they captured the area so called AP.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom