Will India and China fight a war again?

[Sergi]

TAiwan was fighting for their territorial integrity. Not every country get their independence without fighting for it like India.

Yes Indian forces were protecting China in ww2. That must be depressing to hear

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Yes Indian forces were protecting China in ww2. That must be depressing to hear

You mean British forces, made up of Indian slaves?

There was no country called India in WW2. It was just an extension of the British Empire.

 

[faithfulguy]

Yes Indian forces were protecting China in ww2. That must be depressing to hear

Actually, china and Britain helped each other in WWII. India never helped as it was no where to be found.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Actually, china and Britain helped each other in WWII.

More advertising of vulgar affinity for the British

India never helped as it was no where to be found.

You should look into League of Nations

 

[posedion]

Actually, china and Britain helped each other in WWII. India never helped as it was no where to be found.

Well Well Well if iam right japan was busy raping you, may be many of your great leaders were born then

 

[grey boy 2]

In 1962 "cake walk", China and India having similar overall national strength, we manage to send thousands of your army boys to sleep and of cos thousands of nice POW.

One thing i need to gave credit to Indians though was that your army boys were proven good dancers, with superior EQ=Surrender with a BIG smile on their faces

On the topic: If only if a Sino-Indo war happen in 2012.......check out the article below and imagine the outcome....
Comparing India and China: Chasing the dragon | The Economist

Oct 3rd 2011, 15:26 by The Economist online

How the Asian superpowers compare on various measures of development

IN THE recent Singapore Grand Prix, a car belonging to the Force India team reached the finish line just 111 seconds after the leader. Today's chart uses a stopwatch to compare India's progress in development against another pace-setter, China. The chart shows the number of years that have elapsed since China passed the development milestones that India has now reached. India's income per head, for example, was about $3,200 in 2009 (holding purchasing power constant across time and between countries). China reached that level of development nine years ago. The lag in social progress is much longer. A child's odds of surviving past their fifth birthday are as bad in India today as they were in China in the 1970s. Moreover, the chart does not necessarily imply that India in nine years' time will be as rich as China is today. That is because China grew faster in the last nine years than India is likely to grow over the next nine. We stopped the clock at $3200 per head. But China did not stop racing ahead.

 

[faithfulguy]

So Taiwan gave up already?



So hence Fishmern should be sent as cannon fodder

The fisherman was there to proclaim their fishing rights. Taiwan is not like India. We do not have a fisherman caste that has low life value.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

You mean British forces, made up of Indian slaves?

There was no country called India in WW2. It was just an extension of the British Empire.

CCP zombie liar lieing for the fourth time.

 

[Sergi]

Who says Hardliner = War? Hardliner means uncompromising.

The CPC can keep a lid on Chinese Nationalism by clamping down hard with authoritarian measures.

That won't happen if we become a democracy.

You said it in your earlier posts. Hardliner means uncompromising is right. But what.
I was going to avoid this but you seems like don't getting my point so am going to do it
Religions Hardliner - Taliban
Race Hardliner - white movements , Baluch movements Tajik movements and you can add LTTE too
Ideology hardliners - Capatalist, communist and Socialist. ( commi and socialist are different even though you don't agree )
CPC is keeping lid by authoritarian measures but these measure don't have a safty valves like in democracy.

I agree the growth of China is due to Single and strict rule. But hey we know only those things that they want us to know. eg Growth of agriculture in China in 50/60 was said to be over 10% officially but later on when actual data came in late 90s it's was 4/5 %. That was a plane lie. Patience of people has limits. Many be Chinese has extended limits but they sure do have limits

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

In 1962 "cake walk", China and India having similar overall national strength, we manage to send thousands of your army boys to sleep and of cos thousands of nice POW.

One thing i need to gave credit to Indians though was that your army boys were proven good dancers, with superior EQ=Surrender with a BIG smile on their faces

On the topic: If only if a Sino-Indo war happen in 2012.......check out the article below and imagine the outcome....
Comparing India and China: Chasing the dragon | The Economist

Oct 3rd 2011, 15:26 by The Economist online

How the Asian superpowers compare on various measures of development

IN THE recent Singapore Grand Prix, a car belonging to the Force India team reached the finish line just 111 seconds after the leader. Today's chart uses a stopwatch to compare India's progress in development against another pace-setter, China. The chart shows the number of years that have elapsed since China passed the development milestones that India has now reached. India's income per head, for example, was about $3,200 in 2009 (holding purchasing power constant across time and between countries). China reached that level of development nine years ago. The lag in social progress is much longer. A child's odds of surviving past their fifth birthday are as bad in India today as they were in China in the 1970s. Moreover, the chart does not necessarily imply that India in nine years' time will be as rich as China is today. That is because China grew faster in the last nine years than India is likely to grow over the next nine. We stopped the clock at $3200 per head. But China did not stop racing ahead.

Stupidest way to judge a war outcome based on the above indicators.

Afghanistan or Vietnam were incomparable to USA in the above indicators, yet the victory isn't seen for the US.

 

[faithfulguy]

More advertising of vulgar affinity for the British




You should look into League of Nations

So who was in control of India at that time? The British just wanted more voice there. It was a fail organization anyway.

The fact that you pasted this show your pride at being a Colonial slave

 

[posedion]

the first war on islam was fought by brave hindus and we fight it to date 1000 years if you ask your all whether friend he will tell you it is hindusthan not Inida and he will tell you that we are raping Islam to date latest in gujarat

Beware your great commie leaders may rape your family in name of communist idelaogy

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

You said it in your earlier posts. Hardliner means uncompromising is right. But what.
I was going to avoid this but you seems like don't getting my point so am going to do it
Religions Hardliner - Taliban
Race Hardliner - white movements , Baluch movements Tajik movements and you can add LTTE too
Ideology hardliners - Capatalist, communist and Socialist. ( commi and socialist are different even though you don't agree )
CPC is keeping lid by authoritarian measures but these measure don't have a safty valves like in democracy.

Democracy does have a lot of safety valves, this is true.

But can you give me the name of one major developing nation, that is performing better than us in terms of economy?

It's too early for us to have democracy. Maybe 10-20 years later, when we reach a higher stage of development.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

The fisherman was there to proclaim their fishing rights.

Given by UN to them?

Taiwan is not like India.

Taiwan cannot be so, India is soverign nation recognized world wide and a member of UN, while Taiwan is.............

We do not have a fisherman caste that has low life value.

You may not have one



















But probably have a fodder fisherman caste

 

[Sergi]

The Rape of Nanking lasted for exactly 1 year.

Whereas the Central Asian Muslims were ruling India for 1000 years. They turned India from a Hindu place into having one of the largest Muslim populations in the world.

There is no such thing as Indian DNA left, after 1000 years under the Central Asian Muslims.

Hahahaah really
Muslims were ruling in India NOT on India. Indian medical is different from rest of world. And really Muslim kings in India preffer Hindu soilders and leaders some people ain't gona like this.
But there were never rapes like Japanises do with plan. And after all there are assh@les everywhere. You don't need to import them