"Will cut tongue of anyone who wants to change Blasphemy Laws" - JI

[Jungibaaz]

I'll ignore that question. Pointless getting into that debate with.

As I have said before, let's wait for this news to be printed and on tv news channels. Then LEAs should investigate and take action - as per the law!

Good thing we can all agree on waiting for authentication and then due process of law, not often the stories on news related to blasphemy follow that procedure.

 

[Hell hound]

Glad the Mods here are well informed and with it. Apparently giving four sources wasn't enough, I got another one in the line waiting to be dropped lol.

So just to be clear, do you condemn any such statement made by anyone, whatever, that would advocate mutilating anyone who wants to change the law? Even if this statement isn't true as you say, would you openly state that advocating this is barbaric and condemnable?

Anyone answering this question can quickly conclude whether their concerns are just about the authenticity of the news, or perhaps more motivations exist related to the content. And I also see that you're not believing multiple sources either, that's fine, I won't comment on that for now.

bulls eye brother

 

[Verve]

Good thing we can all agree on waiting for authentication and then due process of law, not often the stories on news related to blasphemy follow that procedure.

Well, in that case, the usual clan here will carry on no doubt ... swearing and cursing. Maybe 8 pages of that isn't enough.

 

[Zibago]

The Express Tribune is part of the Express media Urdu-language Daily Express newspaper.

Well lets just say i dont like express group they are part of the media cell

 

[Divergent]

Good thing we can all agree on waiting for authentication and then due process of law, not often the stories on news related to blasphemy follow that procedure.

Isn't it funny how instead of condemning one starts to ask for source and when provided requires 'another one?' I mean the bias is obvious. Call a wrong a wrong. Its that simple.

 

[Hell hound]

Isn't it funny how instead of condemning one starts to ask for source and when provided requires 'another one?' I mean the bias is obvious. Call a wrong a wrong. Its that simple.

he is going to keep finding a way to avoid condemning the guy. just as mullah burka and other molvies like him did during the APS attack.

Good thing we can all agree on waiting for authentication and then due process of law, not often the stories on news related to blasphemy follow that procedure.

you and i both know brother he is not waiting for the urdu news.he know that the news is true but just don't want to condemn the act because of his bias

 

[Divergent]

he is going to keep finding a way to avoid condemning the guy. just as mullah burka and other molvies like him did during the APS attack.

Anyone who didn't condemn APS is an evil human being and completely heartless. I have no respect for such people.

 

[Jungibaaz]

Lmao, you'll never guess what I found from a bit of googling. I think our friend ought to give me an award in journalism, maybe Pulitzer prize for this.

 

[Hell hound]

Anyone who didn't condemn APS is an evil human being and completely heartless. I have no respect for such people.

well mullah burka was pretty evil even before the APS so it doesn't matter to him that this act of his was tarnishing his already destroyed reputation.

Lmao, you'll never guess what I found from a bit of googling. I think our friend ought to give me an award in journalism, maybe Pulitzer prize for this.

do share

 

[Jungibaaz]

Here is the interview in question:

Watch 3:15 to 3:50 for the primary source for OP's claims and of those sources presented here.

@Verve Now if you'll excuse us, we can get back to the subject of the thread.

 

[The Sandman]

Here is the interview in question:

Watch 3:15 to 3:50 for the primary source for OP's claims and of those sources presented here.

@Verve Now if you'll excuse us, we can get back to the subject of the thread.

@Hell hound @Zibago @Azlan Haider @Divergent1

 

[CriticalThought]

I know you were not overtly defending the statement here, only taking issue with the authenticity of the source. But you'll forgive us secularists and liberals for doubting whether the reactionaries when it comes to such news are actually concerned with the content of what's being discussed, as opposed to mere qualms about editorial standards.

So just to be clear, do you condemn any such statement made by anyone, whatever, that would advocate mutilating anyone who wants to change the law? Even if this statement isn't true as you say, would you openly state that advocating this is barbaric and condemnable?

Anyone answering this question can quickly conclude whether their concerns are just about the authenticity of the news, or perhaps more motivations exist related to the content. And I also see that you're not believing multiple sources either, that's fine, I won't comment on that for now.

I condone it. It is not barbaric or condemnable at all. When it comes to the elevated position of Holy Prophet Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, we don't sit around idly. Anyone who messes with this aspect should know what's coming for them and should stay clear. Simple. And those who think it is barbaric etc. should reflect on their own faith. Their posts on the forum already tells a certain story to the observer.

 

[Hell hound]

I condone it. It is not barbaric or condemnable at all. When it comes to the elevated position of Holy Prophet Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, we don't sit around idly. Anyone who messes with this aspect should know what's coming for them and should stay clear. Simple. And those who think it is barbaric etc. should reflect on their own faith. Their posts on the forum already tells a certain story to the observer.

Here is the interview in question:

Watch 3:15 to 3:50 for the primary source for OP's claims and of those sources presented here.

@Verve Now if you'll excuse us, we can get back to the subject of the thread.

sahi kar gaye ho bro

 

[Jungibaaz]

I condone it. It is not barbaric or condemnable at all. When it comes to the elevated position of Holy Prophet Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, we don't sit around idly. Anyone who messes with this aspect should know what's coming for them and should stay clear. Simple. And those who think it is barbaric etc. should reflect on their own faith. Their posts on the forum already tells a certain story to the observer.

At least your honest and open about your um... views, my issue here was primarily about the denial going on. The subject itself I'll leave for another liberal to debate you on.

 

[Russell]

'we don't sit around idly'

I'm guessing 'we' won't be saying any of this when 'we' get Temporary Residency > Permanent Residency > Citizenship in Australia. I'm guessing 'we' will 'sit around idly' and 'tolerate' all sorts of abuse of not only the Holy Prophet, but mosques and Islam in Australia.

Aussie...Aussie...Aussie...Oi, Oi, Oi!

Because 'we' only seek to defend Islam where it doesn't actually need defending - but, stay quiet where one actually needs to be brave.

'We' have seen many such keyboard Islamic warriors on social media and elsewhere.